diff mbox series

KVM: GIC: Fix memory leak due to calling kvm_init_irq_routing twice

Message ID 1527750994-14360-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com
State New
Headers show
Series KVM: GIC: Fix memory leak due to calling kvm_init_irq_routing twice | expand

Commit Message

Shannon Zhao May 31, 2018, 7:16 a.m. UTC
kvm_irqchip_create called by kvm_init will call kvm_init_irq_routing to
initialize global capability variables. If we call kvm_init_irq_routing in
GIC realize function, previous allocated memory will leak.

Fix this by deleting the unnecessary call.

Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
---
 hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c   | 1 -
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c | 1 -
 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Eric Auger May 31, 2018, 7:54 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Shannon,

On 05/31/2018 09:16 AM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> kvm_irqchip_create called by kvm_init will call kvm_init_irq_routing to
> initialize global capability variables. If we call kvm_init_irq_routing in
> GIC realize function, previous allocated memory will leak.
> 
> Fix this by deleting the unnecessary call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
openpic_kvm seems to suffer the same leak. Don't you want to fix it as
well?

Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>

Thanks

Eric
> ---
>  hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c   | 1 -
>  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c | 1 -
>  2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> index 6f467e6..204369d 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> @@ -572,7 +572,6 @@ static void kvm_arm_gic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>  
>      if (kvm_has_gsi_routing()) {
>          /* set up irq routing */
> -        kvm_init_irq_routing(kvm_state);
>          for (i = 0; i < s->num_irq - GIC_INTERNAL; ++i) {
>              kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(kvm_state, i, 0, i);
>          }
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> index 001d82b..aa4c7c5 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> @@ -813,7 +813,6 @@ static void kvm_arm_gicv3_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>  
>      if (kvm_has_gsi_routing()) {
>          /* set up irq routing */
> -        kvm_init_irq_routing(kvm_state);
>          for (i = 0; i < s->num_irq - GIC_INTERNAL; ++i) {
>              kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(kvm_state, i, 0, i);
>          }
>
Shannon Zhao May 31, 2018, 8:04 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2018/5/31 15:54, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Shannon,
> 
> On 05/31/2018 09:16 AM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> kvm_irqchip_create called by kvm_init will call kvm_init_irq_routing to
>> initialize global capability variables. If we call kvm_init_irq_routing in
>> GIC realize function, previous allocated memory will leak.
>>
>> Fix this by deleting the unnecessary call.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
> openpic_kvm seems to suffer the same leak. Don't you want to fix it as
> well?
> 
I have a look at below patch of openpic_kvm which says on ppc it doesn't
call kvm_irqchip_create. So no such issue for it.

commit d85937e683f6ff4d68293cb24c780fb1f6820d2c
Author: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date:   Wed Jun 12 15:32:51 2013 -0500

    kvm/openpic: in-kernel mpic support

> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> 
Thanks.

> Thanks
> 
> Eric
>> ---
>>  hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c   | 1 -
>>  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c | 1 -
>>  2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
>> index 6f467e6..204369d 100644
>> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
>> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
>> @@ -572,7 +572,6 @@ static void kvm_arm_gic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>>  
>>      if (kvm_has_gsi_routing()) {
>>          /* set up irq routing */
>> -        kvm_init_irq_routing(kvm_state);
>>          for (i = 0; i < s->num_irq - GIC_INTERNAL; ++i) {
>>              kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(kvm_state, i, 0, i);
>>          }
>> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
>> index 001d82b..aa4c7c5 100644
>> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
>> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
>> @@ -813,7 +813,6 @@ static void kvm_arm_gicv3_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>>  
>>      if (kvm_has_gsi_routing()) {
>>          /* set up irq routing */
>> -        kvm_init_irq_routing(kvm_state);
>>          for (i = 0; i < s->num_irq - GIC_INTERNAL; ++i) {
>>              kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(kvm_state, i, 0, i);
>>          }
>>
> 
> .
>
Eric Auger May 31, 2018, 8:27 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Shannon,

On 05/31/2018 10:04 AM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2018/5/31 15:54, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Shannon,
>>
>> On 05/31/2018 09:16 AM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>> kvm_irqchip_create called by kvm_init will call kvm_init_irq_routing to
>>> initialize global capability variables. If we call kvm_init_irq_routing in
>>> GIC realize function, previous allocated memory will leak.
>>>
>>> Fix this by deleting the unnecessary call.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
>> openpic_kvm seems to suffer the same leak. Don't you want to fix it as
>> well?
>>
> I have a look at below patch of openpic_kvm which says on ppc it doesn't
> call kvm_irqchip_create. So no such issue for it.
> 
> commit d85937e683f6ff4d68293cb24c780fb1f6820d2c
> Author: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> Date:   Wed Jun 12 15:32:51 2013 -0500
> 
>     kvm/openpic: in-kernel mpic support

Ah OK. Thanks for the pointer.

Eric
> 
>> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>>
> Thanks.
> 
>> Thanks
>>
>> Eric
>>> ---
>>>  hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c   | 1 -
>>>  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c | 1 -
>>>  2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
>>> index 6f467e6..204369d 100644
>>> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
>>> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
>>> @@ -572,7 +572,6 @@ static void kvm_arm_gic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>>>  
>>>      if (kvm_has_gsi_routing()) {
>>>          /* set up irq routing */
>>> -        kvm_init_irq_routing(kvm_state);
>>>          for (i = 0; i < s->num_irq - GIC_INTERNAL; ++i) {
>>>              kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(kvm_state, i, 0, i);
>>>          }
>>> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
>>> index 001d82b..aa4c7c5 100644
>>> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
>>> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
>>> @@ -813,7 +813,6 @@ static void kvm_arm_gicv3_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>>>  
>>>      if (kvm_has_gsi_routing()) {
>>>          /* set up irq routing */
>>> -        kvm_init_irq_routing(kvm_state);
>>>          for (i = 0; i < s->num_irq - GIC_INTERNAL; ++i) {
>>>              kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(kvm_state, i, 0, i);
>>>          }
>>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
Peter Maydell May 31, 2018, 1:56 p.m. UTC | #4
On 31 May 2018 at 08:16, Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> wrote:
> kvm_irqchip_create called by kvm_init will call kvm_init_irq_routing to
> initialize global capability variables. If we call kvm_init_irq_routing in
> GIC realize function, previous allocated memory will leak.
>
> Fix this by deleting the unnecessary call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>



Applied to target-arm.next, thanks.

-- PMM
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
index 6f467e6..204369d 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
@@ -572,7 +572,6 @@  static void kvm_arm_gic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
 
     if (kvm_has_gsi_routing()) {
         /* set up irq routing */
-        kvm_init_irq_routing(kvm_state);
         for (i = 0; i < s->num_irq - GIC_INTERNAL; ++i) {
             kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(kvm_state, i, 0, i);
         }
diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
index 001d82b..aa4c7c5 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
@@ -813,7 +813,6 @@  static void kvm_arm_gicv3_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
 
     if (kvm_has_gsi_routing()) {
         /* set up irq routing */
-        kvm_init_irq_routing(kvm_state);
         for (i = 0; i < s->num_irq - GIC_INTERNAL; ++i) {
             kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(kvm_state, i, 0, i);
         }