[v5,1/2] arm_gicv3_kvm: kvm_dist_get/put_priority: skip the registers banked by GICR_IPRIORITYR

While for_each_dist_irq_reg loop starts from GIC_INTERNAL, it forgot to
offset the date array and index. This will overlap the GICR registers
value and leave the last GIC_INTERNAL irq's registers out of update.

Fixes: 367b9f527becdd20ddf116e17a3c0c2bbc486920
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Hi,

On 05/31/2018 05:15 AM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> While for_each_dist_irq_reg loop starts from GIC_INTERNAL, it forgot to
> offset the date array and index. This will overlap the GICR registers
> value and leave the last GIC_INTERNAL irq's registers out of update.
> 
> Fixes: 367b9f527becdd20ddf116e17a3c0c2bbc486920
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>

Thanks

Eric
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
> ---
>  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> index 3536795..147e691 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> @@ -135,7 +135,14 @@ static void kvm_dist_get_priority(GICv3State *s, uint32_t offset, uint8_t *bmp)
>      uint32_t reg, *field;
>      int irq;
>  
> -    field = (uint32_t *)bmp;
> +    /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the first 8
> +     * GICD_IPRIORITYR<n> registers are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding
> +     * functionality is replaced by GICR_IPRIORITYR<n>. It doesn't need to
> +     * sync them. So it needs to skip the field of GIC_INTERNAL irqs in bmp and
> +     * offset.
> +     */
> +    field = (uint32_t *)(bmp + GIC_INTERNAL);
> +    offset += (GIC_INTERNAL * 8) / 8;
>      for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 8) {
>          kvm_gicd_access(s, offset, &reg, false);
>          *field = reg;
> @@ -149,7 +156,14 @@ static void kvm_dist_put_priority(GICv3State *s, uint32_t offset, uint8_t *bmp)
>      uint32_t reg, *field;
>      int irq;
>  
> -    field = (uint32_t *)bmp;
> +    /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the first 8
> +     * GICD_IPRIORITYR<n> registers are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding
> +     * functionality is replaced by GICR_IPRIORITYR<n>. It doesn't need to
> +     * sync them. So it needs to skip the field of GIC_INTERNAL irqs in bmp and
> +     * offset.
> +     */
> +    field = (uint32_t *)(bmp + GIC_INTERNAL);
> +    offset += (GIC_INTERNAL * 8) / 8;
>      for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 8) {
>          reg = *field;
>          kvm_gicd_access(s, offset, &reg, true);
>

On 2018/5/31 19:01, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 05/31/2018 05:15 AM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> While for_each_dist_irq_reg loop starts from GIC_INTERNAL, it forgot to
>> offset the date array and index. This will overlap the GICR registers
>> value and leave the last GIC_INTERNAL irq's registers out of update.
>>
>> Fixes: 367b9f527becdd20ddf116e17a3c0c2bbc486920
>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
>> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> 
Hi Peter,

Looks like we missed picking up this patch. I didn't include this in v6
since you and Eric both reviewed it.

Could you please pick it up?

Thanks,

On 11 June 2018 at 09:32, Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Looks like we missed picking up this patch. I didn't include this in v6
> since you and Eric both reviewed it.
>
> Could you please pick it up?

Oops; added to target-arm.next. (I generally forget entirely about vN
of a patchset as soon as vN+1 appears on the list, so better not to
drop patches from a set unless I've specifically said I've put
them in target-arm.next or they're on the list as their own patchset.)

thanks
-- PMM