Message ID | 1435024385-9084-3-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
<arei.gonglei@huawei.com> writes: > From: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> > > Potentially overflowing expression "1 << prop->bitnr" with > type "int" (32 bits, signed) is evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic, > and then used in a context that expects an expression of type > "uint64_t" (64 bits, unsigned). > > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> > --- > hw/core/qdev-properties.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/core/qdev-properties.c b/hw/core/qdev-properties.c > index a1606de..f78b335 100644 > --- a/hw/core/qdev-properties.c > +++ b/hw/core/qdev-properties.c > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ PropertyInfo qdev_prop_bit = { > static uint64_t qdev_get_prop_mask64(Property *prop) > { > assert(prop->info == &qdev_prop_bit); > - return 0x1 << prop->bitnr; > + return 0x1ull << prop->bitnr; > } > > static void bit64_prop_set(DeviceState *dev, Property *props, bool val) In my opionion, the 0x in 0x1ull is pure noise :)
On Di, 2015-06-23 at 09:53 +0800, arei.gonglei@huawei.com wrote: > static uint64_t qdev_get_prop_mask64(Property *prop) > { > assert(prop->info == &qdev_prop_bit); > - return 0x1 << prop->bitnr; > + return 0x1ull << prop->bitnr; > } Reviewed-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
diff --git a/hw/core/qdev-properties.c b/hw/core/qdev-properties.c index a1606de..f78b335 100644 --- a/hw/core/qdev-properties.c +++ b/hw/core/qdev-properties.c @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ PropertyInfo qdev_prop_bit = { static uint64_t qdev_get_prop_mask64(Property *prop) { assert(prop->info == &qdev_prop_bit); - return 0x1 << prop->bitnr; + return 0x1ull << prop->bitnr; } static void bit64_prop_set(DeviceState *dev, Property *props, bool val)