@@ -1224,7 +1224,12 @@ static void virtio_net_tx_timer(void *opaque)
VirtIONetQueue *q = opaque;
VirtIONet *n = q->n;
VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(n);
- assert(vdev->vm_running);
+ /* This happens when device was stopped but BH wasn't. */
+ if (!vdev->vm_running) {
+ /* Make sure tx waiting is set, so we'll run when restarted. */
+ assert(q->tx_waiting);
+ return;
+ }
q->tx_waiting = 0;
@@ -1244,7 +1249,12 @@ static void virtio_net_tx_bh(void *opaque)
VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(n);
int32_t ret;
- assert(vdev->vm_running);
+ /* This happens when device was stopped but BH wasn't. */
+ if (!vdev->vm_running) {
+ /* Make sure tx waiting is set, so we'll run when restarted. */
+ assert(q->tx_waiting);
+ return;
+ }
q->tx_waiting = 0;
commit 783e7706937fe15523b609b545587a028a2bdd03 virtio-net: stop/start bh when appropriate is incomplete: BH might execute within the same main loop iteration but after vmstop, so in theory, we might trigger an assertion. I was unable to reproduce this in practice, but it seems clear enough that the potential is there, so worth fixing. Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Reported-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> --- hw/net/virtio-net.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)