diff mbox

[v7] powerpc: add PVR mask support

Message ID 1380269103-4506-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Alexey Kardashevskiy Sept. 27, 2013, 8:05 a.m. UTC
IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant change
in behavior between versions, there is no point to add every single CPU
version in QEMU's CPU list. Also, new CPU versions of already supported
CPU won't break the existing code.

This adds PVR value/mask support for KVM, i.e. for -cpu host option.

As CPU family class name for POWER7 is "POWER7-family", there is no need
to touch aliases.

Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>

---
Changes:
v7:
* minor cleanups after Andreas Faerber comments

v6:
* family classes are abstract again
* POWER7+ moved to a separate patch as it also need a separate family
* added ppc_cpu_class_by_pvr_mask() which is a copy of
ppc_cpu_class_by_pvr() but compares PVRs with masks; this function is
called from KVM code only to support the "-cpu host" option; unlike
the original search function, the new one also includes abstract family
classes.

v5:
* removed pvr_default
* added hiding of family CPU classes (should not appear in -cpu ?)
* separated POWER7+ into a class (it used to be POWER7) and added a mask for it
* added mask for POWER8
* added _BASE suffix to PVR mask constants and moved them before actual CPUs

v4:
* removed bogus layer from hierarchy

v3:
* renamed macros to describe the functionality better
* added default PVR value for the powerpc cpu family (what alias used to do)

v2:
* aliases are replaced with another level in class hierarchy
---
 target-ppc/cpu-models.c     |  1 +
 target-ppc/cpu-models.h     |  5 +++++
 target-ppc/cpu-qom.h        |  2 ++
 target-ppc/kvm.c            |  4 ++++
 target-ppc/translate_init.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 56 insertions(+)

Comments

Alexander Graf Sept. 30, 2013, 11:30 a.m. UTC | #1
On 27.09.2013, at 10:05, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:

> IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
> a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant change
> in behavior between versions, there is no point to add every single CPU
> version in QEMU's CPU list. Also, new CPU versions of already supported
> CPU won't break the existing code.
> 
> This adds PVR value/mask support for KVM, i.e. for -cpu host option.
> 
> As CPU family class name for POWER7 is "POWER7-family", there is no need
> to touch aliases.
> 
> Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>

Looks reasonable to me, but I'll wait for an ack from Andreas.


Alex
Alexey Kardashevskiy Oct. 14, 2013, 3:04 a.m. UTC | #2
On 09/30/2013 09:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 27.09.2013, at 10:05, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> 
>> IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
>> a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant change
>> in behavior between versions, there is no point to add every single CPU
>> version in QEMU's CPU list. Also, new CPU versions of already supported
>> CPU won't break the existing code.
>>
>> This adds PVR value/mask support for KVM, i.e. for -cpu host option.
>>
>> As CPU family class name for POWER7 is "POWER7-family", there is no need
>> to touch aliases.
>>
>> Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> 
> Looks reasonable to me, but I'll wait for an ack from Andreas.


Ping, anyone?
Alexey Kardashevskiy Oct. 23, 2013, 1 a.m. UTC | #3
On 10/14/2013 02:04 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 09/30/2013 09:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 27.09.2013, at 10:05, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>
>>> IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
>>> a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant change
>>> in behavior between versions, there is no point to add every single CPU
>>> version in QEMU's CPU list. Also, new CPU versions of already supported
>>> CPU won't break the existing code.
>>>
>>> This adds PVR value/mask support for KVM, i.e. for -cpu host option.
>>>
>>> As CPU family class name for POWER7 is "POWER7-family", there is no need
>>> to touch aliases.
>>>
>>> Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>>
>> Looks reasonable to me, but I'll wait for an ack from Andreas.
> 
> 
> Ping, anyone?


Ping, anyone, please?
Andreas Färber Oct. 23, 2013, 2:57 p.m. UTC | #4
Am 27.09.2013 09:05, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
> IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
> a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant change
> in behavior between versions, there is no point to add every single CPU
> version in QEMU's CPU list. Also, new CPU versions of already supported
> CPU won't break the existing code.
> 
> This adds PVR value/mask support for KVM, i.e. for -cpu host option.
> 
> As CPU family class name for POWER7 is "POWER7-family", there is no need
> to touch aliases.
> 
> Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>

As promised to Paul, using the Hackathon timeslot to review this:

Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>

and sorry for the delay.

Regards,
Andreas
Alexander Graf Oct. 27, 2013, 4:52 p.m. UTC | #5
On 23.10.2013, at 07:57, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:

> Am 27.09.2013 09:05, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
>> IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
>> a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant change
>> in behavior between versions, there is no point to add every single CPU
>> version in QEMU's CPU list. Also, new CPU versions of already supported
>> CPU won't break the existing code.
>> 
>> This adds PVR value/mask support for KVM, i.e. for -cpu host option.
>> 
>> As CPU family class name for POWER7 is "POWER7-family", there is no need
>> to touch aliases.
>> 
>> Cc: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> 
> As promised to Paul, using the Hackathon timeslot to review this:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>

Thanks, applied to ppc-next-1.8


Alex
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/target-ppc/cpu-models.c b/target-ppc/cpu-models.c
index 8dea560..04d88c5 100644
--- a/target-ppc/cpu-models.c
+++ b/target-ppc/cpu-models.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ 
         PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = POWERPC_CPU_CLASS(oc);                       \
                                                                             \
         pcc->pvr          = _pvr;                                           \
+        pcc->pvr_mask     = CPU_POWERPC_DEFAULT_MASK;                       \
         pcc->svr          = _svr;                                           \
         dc->desc          = _desc;                                          \
     }                                                                       \
diff --git a/target-ppc/cpu-models.h b/target-ppc/cpu-models.h
index d9145d1..731ec4a 100644
--- a/target-ppc/cpu-models.h
+++ b/target-ppc/cpu-models.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@  extern PowerPCCPUAlias ppc_cpu_aliases[];
 /*****************************************************************************/
 /* PVR definitions for most known PowerPC                                    */
 enum {
+    CPU_POWERPC_DEFAULT_MASK       = 0xFFFFFFFF,
     /* PowerPC 401 family */
     /* Generic PowerPC 401 */
 #define CPU_POWERPC_401              CPU_POWERPC_401G2
@@ -552,10 +553,14 @@  enum {
     CPU_POWERPC_POWER6             = 0x003E0000,
     CPU_POWERPC_POWER6_5           = 0x0F000001, /* POWER6 in POWER5 mode */
     CPU_POWERPC_POWER6A            = 0x0F000002,
+    CPU_POWERPC_POWER7_BASE        = 0x003F0000,
+    CPU_POWERPC_POWER7_MASK        = 0xFFFF0000,
     CPU_POWERPC_POWER7_v20         = 0x003F0200,
     CPU_POWERPC_POWER7_v21         = 0x003F0201,
     CPU_POWERPC_POWER7_v23         = 0x003F0203,
     CPU_POWERPC_POWER7P_v21        = 0x004A0201,
+    CPU_POWERPC_POWER8_BASE        = 0x004B0000,
+    CPU_POWERPC_POWER8_MASK        = 0xFFFF0000,
     CPU_POWERPC_POWER8_v10         = 0x004B0100,
     CPU_POWERPC_970                = 0x00390202,
     CPU_POWERPC_970FX_v10          = 0x00391100,
diff --git a/target-ppc/cpu-qom.h b/target-ppc/cpu-qom.h
index f3c710a..3f82629 100644
--- a/target-ppc/cpu-qom.h
+++ b/target-ppc/cpu-qom.h
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@  typedef struct PowerPCCPUClass {
     void (*parent_reset)(CPUState *cpu);
 
     uint32_t pvr;
+    uint32_t pvr_mask;
     uint32_t svr;
     uint64_t insns_flags;
     uint64_t insns_flags2;
@@ -99,6 +100,7 @@  static inline PowerPCCPU *ppc_env_get_cpu(CPUPPCState *env)
 #define ENV_OFFSET offsetof(PowerPCCPU, env)
 
 PowerPCCPUClass *ppc_cpu_class_by_pvr(uint32_t pvr);
+PowerPCCPUClass *ppc_cpu_class_by_pvr_mask(uint32_t pvr);
 
 void ppc_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cpu);
 void ppc_cpu_dump_state(CPUState *cpu, FILE *f, fprintf_function cpu_fprintf,
diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm.c b/target-ppc/kvm.c
index 715611a..4bc4496 100644
--- a/target-ppc/kvm.c
+++ b/target-ppc/kvm.c
@@ -1737,6 +1737,7 @@  static void kvmppc_host_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
     uint32_t icache_size = kvmppc_read_int_cpu_dt("i-cache-size");
 
     /* Now fix up the class with information we can query from the host */
+    pcc->pvr = mfpvr();
 
     if (vmx != -1) {
         /* Only override when we know what the host supports */
@@ -1787,6 +1788,9 @@  static int kvm_ppc_register_host_cpu_type(void)
 
     pvr_pcc = ppc_cpu_class_by_pvr(host_pvr);
     if (pvr_pcc == NULL) {
+        pvr_pcc = ppc_cpu_class_by_pvr_mask(host_pvr);
+    }
+    if (pvr_pcc == NULL) {
         return -1;
     }
     type_info.parent = object_class_get_name(OBJECT_CLASS(pvr_pcc));
diff --git a/target-ppc/translate_init.c b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
index 761b2e5..5ef63fa 100644
--- a/target-ppc/translate_init.c
+++ b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
@@ -7216,6 +7216,8 @@  POWERPC_FAMILY(POWER7)(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
 
     dc->fw_name = "PowerPC,POWER7";
     dc->desc = "POWER7";
+    pcc->pvr = CPU_POWERPC_POWER7_BASE;
+    pcc->pvr_mask = CPU_POWERPC_POWER7_MASK;
     pcc->init_proc = init_proc_POWER7;
     pcc->check_pow = check_pow_nocheck;
     pcc->insns_flags = PPC_INSNS_BASE | PPC_ISEL | PPC_STRING | PPC_MFTB |
@@ -7251,6 +7253,8 @@  POWERPC_FAMILY(POWER8)(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
 
     dc->fw_name = "PowerPC,POWER8";
     dc->desc = "POWER8";
+    pcc->pvr = CPU_POWERPC_POWER8_BASE;
+    pcc->pvr_mask = CPU_POWERPC_POWER8_MASK;
     pcc->init_proc = init_proc_POWER7;
     pcc->check_pow = check_pow_nocheck;
     pcc->insns_flags = PPC_INSNS_BASE | PPC_STRING | PPC_MFTB |
@@ -8183,6 +8187,44 @@  PowerPCCPUClass *ppc_cpu_class_by_pvr(uint32_t pvr)
     return pcc;
 }
 
+static gint ppc_cpu_compare_class_pvr_mask(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
+{
+    ObjectClass *oc = (ObjectClass *)a;
+    uint32_t pvr = *(uint32_t *)b;
+    PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = (PowerPCCPUClass *)a;
+    gint ret;
+
+    /* -cpu host does a PVR lookup during construction */
+    if (unlikely(strcmp(object_class_get_name(oc),
+                        TYPE_HOST_POWERPC_CPU) == 0)) {
+        return -1;
+    }
+
+#if defined(TARGET_PPCEMB)
+    if (pcc->mmu_model != POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE) {
+        return -1;
+    }
+#endif
+    ret = (((pcc->pvr & pcc->pvr_mask) == (pvr & pcc->pvr_mask)) ? 0 : -1);
+
+    return ret;
+}
+
+PowerPCCPUClass *ppc_cpu_class_by_pvr_mask(uint32_t pvr)
+{
+    GSList *list, *item;
+    PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = NULL;
+
+    list = object_class_get_list(TYPE_POWERPC_CPU, true);
+    item = g_slist_find_custom(list, &pvr, ppc_cpu_compare_class_pvr_mask);
+    if (item != NULL) {
+        pcc = POWERPC_CPU_CLASS(item->data);
+    }
+    g_slist_free(list);
+
+    return pcc;
+}
+
 static gint ppc_cpu_compare_class_name(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
 {
     ObjectClass *oc = (ObjectClass *)a;
@@ -8557,6 +8599,8 @@  static void ppc_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
     DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
 
     pcc->parent_realize = dc->realize;
+    pcc->pvr = CPU_POWERPC_DEFAULT_MASK;
+    pcc->pvr_mask = CPU_POWERPC_DEFAULT_MASK;
     dc->realize = ppc_cpu_realizefn;
     dc->unrealize = ppc_cpu_unrealizefn;