Message ID | 20230530183941.7223-1-quintela@redhat.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Next round of migration atomic counters | expand |
Am 30.05.23 um 20:39 schrieb Juan Quintela: > Hi > > On this v2: > > - dropped qemu_fflush() assert for read only files (make Richard > happy) > > - Update documentation for qemu_file_transferred (make Fabiano happy) > > - migration/rdma: Remove qemu_fopen_rdma() and make it look like > everything else > > - Simplify a couple of qemu-file functions, and unexport the ones that > are not used outside of qemu-file.c > > - Added Reviewed-by comments. > > Please review. > Hi, I don't notice any performance regression with snapshots anymore with this series :) Note that I had to apply your PULL patches from yesterday too, to be able to apply this series: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-05/msg07361.html Best Regards, Fiona
Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> wrote: > Am 30.05.23 um 20:39 schrieb Juan Quintela: >> Hi >> >> On this v2: >> >> - dropped qemu_fflush() assert for read only files (make Richard >> happy) >> >> - Update documentation for qemu_file_transferred (make Fabiano happy) >> >> - migration/rdma: Remove qemu_fopen_rdma() and make it look like >> everything else >> >> - Simplify a couple of qemu-file functions, and unexport the ones that >> are not used outside of qemu-file.c >> >> - Added Reviewed-by comments. >> >> Please review. >> > Hi, > I don't notice any performance regression with snapshots anymore with > this series :) > > Note that I had to apply your PULL patches from yesterday too, to be > able to apply this series: > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-05/msg07361.html I know, thanks. Later, Juan.