Message ID | 20221208082955.51732-1-its@irrelevant.dk |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=irrelevant.dk header.i=@irrelevant.dk header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=ZaDr+Nwp; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=XziVzpc2; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NSS6g20H3z23ys for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 19:31:21 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <qemu-devel-bounces@nongnu.org>) id 1p3CId-0004LN-8V; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 03:30:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <its@irrelevant.dk>) id 1p3CIC-0004KR-2W; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 03:30:08 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <its@irrelevant.dk>) id 1p3CI8-0003Nf-GZ; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 03:30:07 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4AD5C0159; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 03:30:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 08 Dec 2022 03:30:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=irrelevant.dk; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from :from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1670488200; x=1670574600; bh=ss 0KJjmLOsP77UsFI/omxohBYWaaQf4wFiQL12hx338=; b=ZaDr+Nwp/1qLDmp4k5 TtZIngy/9q9J9BZGF1uWre1QTqEhoCdqWFy64xq9s+1ZQQx7Ff+wBzcv1N1MU2OI Y16qoIcgk86uXzIpXAiizhTtNDXE0GuqLhw5w/TGgBDuitr90hgXv8lalY3DnYy3 /c0OQcK7ep2SpZCwgeWnyslJR2x10DhsfpeRIOnIUk2CPLvl+0HKeygN05h8ngyX jQX4xtV0jthbel5y4V/MXpg8BA++X3raslSRKTXSfODfiH51NmOV0cYq53Yke6mU 0nDks5zLm2dgdcxKyyQLniIYIr2uBDsjS5TXi33rSYoId1RmcyQT6hWeEI9JGtGP JqHw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1670488200; x=1670574600; bh=ss0KJjmLOsP77 UsFI/omxohBYWaaQf4wFiQL12hx338=; b=XziVzpc224xPE5VuTgkqQveWU8agh a9/5TNDZ1S6rHgdYOEJ0uTkXmlY/FNU63nGeY/lXmAZ6054QDtOU31+bkagZOcMB LUQjZlc8zpQKb14mkn+kdyioqp55Zm6Gk4AOs/ukZ8v3yJPVw/W/TQhp89pe/xPn x25dSL6Tvpb3zST0vyZCY+DPOH+wb1BK3Qe84uqLOPNe+lOeGhVnubsXyna5BBXA k2RLf13x48vs/xRx17UaRsqBWpxnZg0wyjRK/6+exLnD0sPxvWGUaM9CZRTFPCVK 8mudwkdYxb9/a0ZDVlfgKjlk+XnIdfUrZGIfo4FV+AwQO7yMZlrDIJ1hA== X-ME-Sender: <xms:hqCRYz_mzUesU7g9qWYIf744RT4HOm-FW3j6JXYBEbgKdWMrRFjbQw> <xme:hqCRY_u-kbs1_FpDWIGf3REzgPsU1fCyltgAvkcSa-Iv5KVDpxuaZ9sbWeqWo3CtM gO-0V1dEpfIoHyALrM> X-ME-Received: <xmr:hqCRYxAraH_O3CAo1WXF11v43zj1lVI2pldZPcQK_B1tvbPOq-9dssgHv4i4SxOaVIHttaxBalDoNpmiyziPzFbogfQDS6kmLeTE2w> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudelgdduvdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkofgtggfgsehtkeertdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpefmlhgruhhs ucflvghnshgvnhcuoehithhssehirhhrvghlvghvrghnthdrughkqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeeiffeujeegteduleejtdefveeiueekleffffeltddvvdehveegudetudeftddt veenucffohhmrghinhepkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepihhtshesihhrrhgvlhgvvhgrnhhtrdgukh X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:h6CRY_chrq1UnXq0RRvfp0OEaQYq07bfdx0uXOGJGy9DzM2ouizTww> <xmx:h6CRY4MkoCPwG9ynWSqyPR23BMZ_vFDK_2FikhtlmYK56bkPvTq_cw> <xmx:h6CRYxnap8__DD3Oi0QSVZt_rl0C9LA1q-9nZLP-mvQqROSyMt1L4Q> <xmx:iKCRY32hjCmX8FesyLOAqGMthqYQfVwXzdwVNeHdGSeBEo5XTyITfw> Feedback-ID: idc91472f:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 03:29:57 -0500 (EST) From: Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Jinhao Fan <fanjinhao21s@ict.ac.cn>, Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com> Subject: [PATCH 0/1] hw/nvme: shadow doorbells broken on riscv64 Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:29:54 +0100 Message-Id: <20221208082955.51732-1-its@irrelevant.dk> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=577; i=k.jensen@samsung.com; h=from:subject; bh=kkPhZqkdSLGvGGbExfdJRY5uD3U4WaJALU7KZMKidOk=; b=owJ4nAFtAZL+kA0DAAoBTeGvMW1PDekByyZiAGORoIMXWAo8ouQgA+h5KNYXNBS8kpyfq4BWy5Ec 6yBTqVHeb4kBMwQAAQoAHRYhBFIoM6p14tzmokdmwE3hrzFtTw3pBQJjkaCDAAoJEE3hrzFtTw3pv6 sIAKDcSHu+/upx8r8QBgwG62TDATjWOmgG6fXhWgfJPK9jboVPTaoFDvQm5Sg/n9vb6F0mA8JW+0we AW+Sd8sKnstnTazqvJR0wVCPs3Fg3a0dJcxlbQ9Yf7x6TUpRYKf+HanSctwQXsF2tJiJs5lxBLE8OP 6I6F2gccuZ2MZZIocsMwX8UBKXG4kq8ZQCjY0nMNdeW2IQtTXlT4qQNePpSDGnZPTEc4RMxP83cqyg LelV4IJQGTWsmgHGpconrZqBtcHcOjF84P3AH6n7o56+1FwyiFJ3JY3Uz0feqzQT6zcXHRVqqb7Egp c3LjNnnO8fNFACfNpvoN5m8HFDfjtsrUgXladg X-Developer-Key: i=k.jensen@samsung.com; a=openpgp; fpr=DDCA4D9C9EF931CC3468427263D56FC5E55DA838 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.28; envelope-from=its@irrelevant.dk; helo=out4-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel> List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org |
Series |
hw/nvme: shadow doorbells broken on riscv64
|
expand
|
On 8/12/22 09:29, Klaus Jensen wrote: > From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com> > > Guenter reports[1] that hw/nvme is broken on riscv64. > > This is a regression since 7.1, so this does not warrent an rc5 for 7.2. > I'm sure Guenter can carry this patch in his tree, and maybe we can get > this out in a stable release. Delaying to 8.0 and adding a 'Cc: qemu-stable@' tag seems wise. Cc'ing riscv list in case. > I really wonder why this issue only shows up on riscv64. We have not > observed this on other platforms (yet). > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20221207174918.GA1151796@roeck-us.net/ > > Klaus Jensen (1): > hw/nvme: fix missing cq eventidx update > > hw/nvme/ctrl.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >
From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com> Guenter reports[1] that hw/nvme is broken on riscv64. This is a regression since 7.1, so this does not warrent an rc5 for 7.2. I'm sure Guenter can carry this patch in his tree, and maybe we can get this out in a stable release. I really wonder why this issue only shows up on riscv64. We have not observed this on other platforms (yet). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20221207174918.GA1151796@roeck-us.net/ Klaus Jensen (1): hw/nvme: fix missing cq eventidx update hw/nvme/ctrl.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)