diff mbox series

[ovs-dev,1/2] ofctrl: Remove unused hashmap.

Message ID 20210615132444.3190653-1-mmichels@redhat.com
State Accepted
Headers show
Series [ovs-dev,1/2] ofctrl: Remove unused hashmap. | expand

Commit Message

Mark Michelson June 15, 2021, 1:24 p.m. UTC
Signed-off-by: Mark Michelson <mmichels@redhat.com>
---
 controller/ofctrl.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Mark Michelson June 15, 2021, 1:28 p.m. UTC | #1
On 6/15/21 9:24 AM, Mark Michelson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mark Michelson <mmichels@redhat.com>
> ---
>   controller/ofctrl.c | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/controller/ofctrl.c b/controller/ofctrl.c
> index 053631590..48d001506 100644
> --- a/controller/ofctrl.c
> +++ b/controller/ofctrl.c
> @@ -1259,7 +1259,6 @@ ofctrl_flood_remove_flows(struct ovn_desired_flow_table *flow_table,
>        * Copying the sb_uuids into an array. */
>       struct uuid *sb_uuids;
>       sb_uuids = xmalloc(hmap_count(flood_remove_nodes) * sizeof *sb_uuids);
> -    struct hmap flood_remove_uuids = HMAP_INITIALIZER(&flood_remove_uuids);
>       HMAP_FOR_EACH (ofrn, hmap_node, flood_remove_nodes) {
>           sb_uuids[n++] = ofrn->sb_uuid;
>       }
> 

This series is probably the most trivial I've ever put up for review. I 
almost merged this series directly without first doing a review. 
However, I talked myself into going through the review process. I'm 
curious how people would feel if devs committed changes like this 
directly instead of engaging in the review process.

Thanks,
Mark
Numan Siddique June 15, 2021, 5:36 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 9:28 AM Mark Michelson <mmichels@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/15/21 9:24 AM, Mark Michelson wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Michelson <mmichels@redhat.com>

For both the patches in the series:
Acked-by: Numan Siddique <numans@ovn.org>

> > ---
> >   controller/ofctrl.c | 1 -
> >   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/controller/ofctrl.c b/controller/ofctrl.c
> > index 053631590..48d001506 100644
> > --- a/controller/ofctrl.c
> > +++ b/controller/ofctrl.c
> > @@ -1259,7 +1259,6 @@ ofctrl_flood_remove_flows(struct ovn_desired_flow_table *flow_table,
> >        * Copying the sb_uuids into an array. */
> >       struct uuid *sb_uuids;
> >       sb_uuids = xmalloc(hmap_count(flood_remove_nodes) * sizeof *sb_uuids);
> > -    struct hmap flood_remove_uuids = HMAP_INITIALIZER(&flood_remove_uuids);
> >       HMAP_FOR_EACH (ofrn, hmap_node, flood_remove_nodes) {
> >           sb_uuids[n++] = ofrn->sb_uuid;
> >       }
> >
>
> This series is probably the most trivial I've ever put up for review. I
> almost merged this series directly without first doing a review.
> However, I talked myself into going through the review process. I'm
> curious how people would feel if devs committed changes like this
> directly instead of engaging in the review process.

I don't have a strong opinion. I'm fine for such trivial patches.

Thanks
Numan

>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev@openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>
Ben Pfaff July 7, 2021, 7:01 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 09:28:25AM -0400, Mark Michelson wrote:
> On 6/15/21 9:24 AM, Mark Michelson wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Michelson <mmichels@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >   controller/ofctrl.c | 1 -
> >   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/controller/ofctrl.c b/controller/ofctrl.c
> > index 053631590..48d001506 100644
> > --- a/controller/ofctrl.c
> > +++ b/controller/ofctrl.c
> > @@ -1259,7 +1259,6 @@ ofctrl_flood_remove_flows(struct ovn_desired_flow_table *flow_table,
> >        * Copying the sb_uuids into an array. */
> >       struct uuid *sb_uuids;
> >       sb_uuids = xmalloc(hmap_count(flood_remove_nodes) * sizeof *sb_uuids);
> > -    struct hmap flood_remove_uuids = HMAP_INITIALIZER(&flood_remove_uuids);
> >       HMAP_FOR_EACH (ofrn, hmap_node, flood_remove_nodes) {
> >           sb_uuids[n++] = ofrn->sb_uuid;
> >       }
> > 
> 
> This series is probably the most trivial I've ever put up for review. I
> almost merged this series directly without first doing a review. However, I
> talked myself into going through the review process. I'm curious how people
> would feel if devs committed changes like this directly instead of engaging
> in the review process.

I normally post them for review anyway.  The only commits I routinely
push without review are ones that just add people to AUTHORS.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/controller/ofctrl.c b/controller/ofctrl.c
index 053631590..48d001506 100644
--- a/controller/ofctrl.c
+++ b/controller/ofctrl.c
@@ -1259,7 +1259,6 @@  ofctrl_flood_remove_flows(struct ovn_desired_flow_table *flow_table,
      * Copying the sb_uuids into an array. */
     struct uuid *sb_uuids;
     sb_uuids = xmalloc(hmap_count(flood_remove_nodes) * sizeof *sb_uuids);
-    struct hmap flood_remove_uuids = HMAP_INITIALIZER(&flood_remove_uuids);
     HMAP_FOR_EACH (ofrn, hmap_node, flood_remove_nodes) {
         sb_uuids[n++] = ofrn->sb_uuid;
     }