| Message ID | 20210408103348.26561-3-foss@volatilesystems.org |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show
Return-Path: <openwrt-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.openwrt.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.openwrt.org (client-ip=2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05; helo=desiato.infradead.org; envelope-from=openwrt-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.openwrt.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b=hNEhk9Ln; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=volatilesystems.org header.i=@volatilesystems.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=ioUnNEao; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=volatilesystems.org header.i=@volatilesystems.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=WdOUNZic; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FGHqX6Vxcz9sWC for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 20:41:12 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date: Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=tkCdGgVOxIv9Amf1EjvkMaHjEu5HOvXjZCrVJgzMmUQ=; b=hNEhk9LnL6bX8S2ki7/zlZkqi T+YM53cKVOeBS/gV6835Q/f9MeO+zRQlzWuudX6Ur2DeiYkY/xknqtL4mzv7fHy+vdxO2k+5CTS5u ddsAn8TCktwPGlZ296hsm8600DvOnxHLDYKQCZcdDCLkDCoqkp7osr+0zDLzSq6PlCvpjaflbI1nK SH8U5QUcbL6bEdqUf2TNIyS2kliiaHy/wMaTTZ74ZeLhk/8h7pq0wwhSzn07kcqp35574zTDtmavN +EuiFw2+JSTNdJjZmRyUu9UXxT/wJ+R0Y4wWExXJNPiuDue+wublIjdQCzYEcnfEMJEC89n1dEEYT s4W3xEqtQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lUS44-007fsh-UD; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 10:39:09 +0000 Received: from volatilesystems.org ([51.91.248.52]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lUS3w-007fqO-CY for openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 10:39:05 +0000 Received: by volatilesystems.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id C544CFA700; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 12:38:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=volatilesystems.org; s=mail; t=1617878337; bh=QlipytyFng6arYThUVox0z1g7E5dZJO96mid4p0AWeY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ioUnNEaoX5LYN0+OXh0eT0fmgmMYfS3+ltggINKwZaiP/S+vZMHqbTzL5yZSW1nLn wixWDljgiV65c1rLDj3xrvw9yGU+PbMMIbqikmuiroMq+i6juKskSlR3mqFZbY1mya D2DgYcupD/07JnKF6iT7VqIMdnmmXrT+cc/iJDDw= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on atalanta X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from okeanos.lan (213.219.177.220.adsl.dyn.edpnet.net [213.219.177.220]) by volatilesystems.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80B54FA6FD; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 12:38:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=volatilesystems.org; s=mail; t=1617878335; bh=QlipytyFng6arYThUVox0z1g7E5dZJO96mid4p0AWeY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WdOUNZicGnLHt2Pgt8xck6O1e873LtokmzZYJh+bxGeGSmomGFRLm0NZS1pD6HS7t aFyP1q8nLZuPKrI4dKQkA1U56WVbBlQpFdZU/SPj1mSbdVlEEfLxcvlGRVdV8BDQKB 2UmqWOdeBbi+u1e0NLL+qGCLrBejso9xQ2KL+5pA= From: Stijn Segers <foss@volatilesystems.org> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Cc: hauke@hauke-m.de Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] realtek: correct PoE power budget for GS110TPP v1 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 12:33:47 +0200 Message-Id: <20210408103348.26561-3-foss@volatilesystems.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20210408103348.26561-1-foss@volatilesystems.org> References: <20210408103348.26561-1-foss@volatilesystems.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at atalanta X-Virus-Status: Clean X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210408_113900_804478_A56F8DC5 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.29 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "desiato.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: According to multiple sources (Netgear web page [1], Wikidevi [2] and Biot's wiki [3] this switch has a 120W PoE power budget, not a 130W one. [1] https://www.netgear.com/business/wired/switches/smart-cloud/gs110tpp/ [2] https://wikidevi.wi-cat.ru/Netgear_GS110TPP [3] https://biot.com/switches/gs110tpp Content analysis details: (-0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid X-BeenThere: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: OpenWrt Development List <openwrt-devel.lists.openwrt.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/options/openwrt-devel>, <mailto:openwrt-devel-request@lists.openwrt.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> List-Help: <mailto:openwrt-devel-request@lists.openwrt.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel>, <mailto:openwrt-devel-request@lists.openwrt.org?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "openwrt-devel" <openwrt-devel-bounces@lists.openwrt.org> Errors-To: openwrt-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.openwrt.org |
| Series |
Realtek: various fixes
|
expand
|
diff --git a/target/linux/realtek/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network b/target/linux/realtek/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network index 1e199db589..b27bed9a63 100644 --- a/target/linux/realtek/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network +++ b/target/linux/realtek/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ done case $board in netgear,gs110tpp-v1) - ucidef_set_poe 130 "$lan_list" + ucidef_set_poe 120 "$lan_list" ;; zyxel,gs1900-10hp) ucidef_set_poe 77 "$lan_list"
According to multiple sources (Netgear web page [1], Wikidevi [2] and Biot's wiki [3] this switch has a 120W PoE power budget, not a 130W one. [1] https://www.netgear.com/business/wired/switches/smart-cloud/gs110tpp/ [2] https://wikidevi.wi-cat.ru/Netgear_GS110TPP [3] https://biot.com/switches/gs110tpp Signed-off-by: Stijn Segers <foss@volatilesystems.org> --- target/linux/realtek/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)