| Message ID | 1451509166-5157-4-git-send-email-openwrt@kresin.me |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/package/network/config/ltq-vdsl-app/files/dsl_control b/package/network/config/ltq-vdsl-app/files/dsl_control index 22d775c..f6275a0 100644 --- a/package/network/config/ltq-vdsl-app/files/dsl_control +++ b/package/network/config/ltq-vdsl-app/files/dsl_control @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ xtse_adsl_b="10_00_10_00_00_04_00_07" # G.993.2 Annex A/B/C xtse_adsl_j="10_00_10_40_00_04_01_07" -xtse_vdsl="00_00_00_00_00_00_00_07" - service_triggers() { procd_add_reload_trigger network } @@ -67,7 +65,6 @@ start_service() { esac eval "xtse=\"\${xtse_xdsl_$annex}\"" - [ -z "${xtse}" ] && xtse=$xtse_vdsl [ -z "${firmware}" ] && firmware=/lib/firmware/vdsl.bin [ -f "${firmware}" ] || {
r47933 revealed that the driver/app in combination with the chosen firmware does a good job in selecting a working xtse. Use this probing mode if no annex is specified. Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin <openwrt@kresin.me> --- Since a predefined annex isn't required, what about using 'auto' when creating the initial config? Any opinions? package/network/config/ltq-vdsl-app/files/dsl_control | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)