Message ID | 1557087260-32680-1-git-send-email-ynezz@true.cz |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | build: allow selective per device initramfs | expand |
Hi Petr, On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 10:14 PM Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz> wrote: > I find it quite weird to demand any kind of compilation by the end-users, but > I also find it quite wasteful to build initramfs images for all devices under > particular target (lantiq/xrx200 and ramips/mt7620), just because one (or > minority) of device needs this image. > > So I've looked at the possible solutions, and with the limited time on hand > I've come up with the following patch series. I'm sure, that this is kind of a > weird workaround, but I find it less obtrusive then building of initramfs > images for all targets, with no apparent use. > > Essential solution would be something like image recipe for initramfs, but > since it's quite complicated topic it would need a lot more time to fix it > properly. > > So I'm wondering if such workaround to avoid building of unnecessary initramfs > images would be acceptable, or until there's a proper solution, we should > simply live with the `FEATURES += ramdisk` based "solution". Thank you for sharing your patches. I had started implementing a similar solution, but quickly abandoned my work when I saw the commits in your staging tree. Even though I have no authority, I think your solution is nice and it solves the problem at hand. I applied your patches and modified mt7620 + the HDRM200 target accordingly, and as expected I only get one initramfs image. I agree that building initramfs for devices that do not need it is redundant (I see that initramfs is built for all mt7621 targets for example), so I am very much in favor of merging this series. BR, Kristian