diff mbox series

[ovs-dev] ofproto: Return error codes for Rule insertions

Message ID a5069e2e949c46fe9bc6b695ddd4abc4@BLRX13MDC429.AMER.DELL.COM
State Accepted
Headers show
Series [ovs-dev] ofproto: Return error codes for Rule insertions | expand

Commit Message

Aravind.Sridharan@dell.com April 23, 2019, 11:44 a.m. UTC
Currently, rule_insert() API does not have return value. There are
some possible scenarios where rule insertions can fail at run-time
even though the static checks during rule_construct() had passed
previously.
Some possible scenarios for failure of rule insertions:
**) Rule insertions can fail dynamically in Hybrid mode (both
Openflow and Normal switch functioning coexist) where the
CAM space could get suddenly filled up by Normal switch
functioning and Openflow gets devoid of available space.
**) Some deployments could have separate independent layers for
HW rule insertions and application layer to interact with OVS.
HW layer could face any dynamic issue during rule handling which
application could not have predicted/captured in
rule-construction phase.
Rule-insert errors for bundles are handled too in this pull-request.

Testing:
-------
Tested failures of rule insertions and also with bundles.

Signed-off-by: Aravind Prasad S <aravind.sridharan@dell.com>

static void ofproto_flow_mod_revert(struct ofproto *,
                                     struct ofproto_flow_mod *)
     OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex);
-static void ofproto_flow_mod_finish(struct ofproto *,
-                                    struct ofproto_flow_mod *,
-                                    const struct openflow_mod_requester *)
+static enum ofperr ofproto_flow_mod_finish(struct ofproto *,
+                                           struct ofproto_flow_mod *,
+                                           const struct openflow_mod_requester *)
     OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex);
static enum ofperr handle_flow_mod__(struct ofproto *,
                                      const struct ofputil_flow_mod *,
@@ -5115,7 +5115,7 @@ add_flow_revert(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm)
}
 /* To be called after version bump. */
-static void
+static enum ofperr
add_flow_finish(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm,
                 const struct openflow_mod_requester *req)
     OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex)
@@ -5124,8 +5124,14 @@ add_flow_finish(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm,
         ? rule_collection_rules(&ofm->old_rules)[0] : NULL;
     struct rule *new_rule = rule_collection_rules(&ofm->new_rules)[0];
     struct ovs_list dead_cookies = OVS_LIST_INITIALIZER(&dead_cookies);
+    enum ofperr error = 0;
+
+    error = replace_rule_finish(ofproto, ofm, req, old_rule, new_rule,
+                                &dead_cookies);
+    if (error) {
+        return error;
+    }
-    replace_rule_finish(ofproto, ofm, req, old_rule, new_rule, &dead_cookies);
     learned_cookies_flush(ofproto, &dead_cookies);
     if (old_rule) {
@@ -5138,6 +5144,8 @@ add_flow_finish(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm,
         /* Send Vacancy Events for OF1.4+. */
         send_table_status(ofproto, new_rule->table_id);
     }
+
+    return error;
}

 /* OFPFC_MODIFY and OFPFC_MODIFY_STRICT. */
@@ -5334,22 +5342,25 @@ ofproto_flow_mod_learn_revert(struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm)
     ofproto_flow_mod_revert(rule->ofproto, ofm);
}
-void
+enum ofperr
ofproto_flow_mod_learn_finish(struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm,
                               struct ofproto *orig_ofproto)
     OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex)
{
     struct rule *rule = rule_collection_rules(&ofm->new_rules)[0];
+    enum ofperr error = 0;
     /* If learning on a different bridge, must bump its version
      * number and flush connmgr afterwards. */
     if (rule->ofproto != orig_ofproto) {
         ofproto_bump_tables_version(rule->ofproto);
     }
-    ofproto_flow_mod_finish(rule->ofproto, ofm, NULL);
+    error = ofproto_flow_mod_finish(rule->ofproto, ofm, NULL);
     if (rule->ofproto != orig_ofproto) {
         ofmonitor_flush(rule->ofproto->connmgr);
     }
+
+    return error;
}
 /* Refresh 'ofm->temp_rule', for which the caller holds a reference, if already
@@ -5404,7 +5415,7 @@ ofproto_flow_mod_learn(struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm, bool keep_ref,
             error = ofproto_flow_mod_learn_start(ofm);
             if (!error) {
-                ofproto_flow_mod_learn_finish(ofm, NULL);
+                error = ofproto_flow_mod_learn_finish(ofm, NULL);
             }
         } else {
             static struct vlog_rate_limit rll = VLOG_RATE_LIMIT_INIT(1, 5);
@@ -5504,7 +5515,7 @@ replace_rule_revert(struct ofproto *ofproto,
}
 /* Adds the 'new_rule', replacing the 'old_rule'. */
-static void
+static enum ofperr
replace_rule_finish(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm,
                     const struct openflow_mod_requester *req,
                     struct rule *old_rule, struct rule *new_rule,
@@ -5512,6 +5523,8 @@ replace_rule_finish(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm,
     OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex)
{
     struct rule *replaced_rule;
+    enum ofperr error = 0;
+    struct oftable *table = &ofproto->tables[new_rule->table_id];
     replaced_rule = (old_rule && old_rule->removed_reason != OFPRR_EVICTION)
         ? old_rule : NULL;
@@ -5521,8 +5534,15 @@ replace_rule_finish(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm,
      * link the packet and byte counts from the old rule to the new one if
      * 'modify_keep_counts' is 'true'.  The 'replaced_rule' will be deleted
      * right after this call. */
-    ofproto->ofproto_class->rule_insert(new_rule, replaced_rule,
-                                        ofm->modify_keep_counts);
+    error = ofproto->ofproto_class->rule_insert(new_rule, replaced_rule,
+                                                ofm->modify_keep_counts);
+    if (error) {
+        if (classifier_remove(&table->cls, &new_rule->cr)) {
+            ofproto_rule_destroy__(new_rule);
+        }
+        return error;
+    }
+
     learned_cookies_inc(ofproto, rule_get_actions(new_rule));
     if (old_rule) {
@@ -5558,6 +5578,8 @@ replace_rule_finish(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm,
                              req ? req->request->xid : 0, NULL);
         }
     }
+
+    return error;
}
 /* ofm->temp_rule is consumed only in the successful case. */
@@ -5706,17 +5728,18 @@ modify_flows_revert(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm)
     }
}
-static void
+static enum ofperr
modify_flows_finish(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm,
                     const struct openflow_mod_requester *req)
     OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex)
{
     struct rule_collection *old_rules = &ofm->old_rules;
     struct rule_collection *new_rules = &ofm->new_rules;
+    enum ofperr error = 0;
     if (rule_collection_n(old_rules) == 0
         && rule_collection_n(new_rules) == 1) {
-        add_flow_finish(ofproto, ofm, req);
+        error = add_flow_finish(ofproto, ofm, req);
     } else if (rule_collection_n(old_rules) > 0) {
         struct ovs_list dead_cookies = OVS_LIST_INITIALIZER(&dead_cookies);
@@ -5725,12 +5748,17 @@ modify_flows_finish(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm,
         struct rule *old_rule, *new_rule;
         RULE_COLLECTIONS_FOR_EACH (old_rule, new_rule, old_rules, new_rules) {
-            replace_rule_finish(ofproto, ofm, req, old_rule, new_rule,
-                                &dead_cookies);
+            error = replace_rule_finish(ofproto, ofm, req, old_rule, new_rule,
+                                        &dead_cookies);
+            if (error) {
+                return error;
+            }
         }
         learned_cookies_flush(ofproto, &dead_cookies);
         remove_rules_postponed(old_rules);
     }
+
+    return error;
}
 static enum ofperr
@@ -6094,7 +6122,7 @@ handle_flow_mod__(struct ofproto *ofproto, const struct ofputil_flow_mod *fm,
     error = ofproto_flow_mod_start(ofproto, &ofm);
     if (!error) {
         ofproto_bump_tables_version(ofproto);
-        ofproto_flow_mod_finish(ofproto, &ofm, req);
+        error = ofproto_flow_mod_finish(ofproto, &ofm, req);
         ofmonitor_flush(ofproto->connmgr);
     }
     ovs_mutex_unlock(&ofproto_mutex);
@@ -7960,19 +7988,21 @@ ofproto_flow_mod_revert(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm)
     rule_collection_destroy(&ofm->new_rules);
}
-static void
+static enum ofperr
ofproto_flow_mod_finish(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm,
                         const struct openflow_mod_requester *req)
     OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex)
{
+    enum ofperr error = 0;
+
     switch (ofm->command) {
     case OFPFC_ADD:
-        add_flow_finish(ofproto, ofm, req);
+        error = add_flow_finish(ofproto, ofm, req);
         break;
     case OFPFC_MODIFY:
     case OFPFC_MODIFY_STRICT:
-        modify_flows_finish(ofproto, ofm, req);
+        error = modify_flows_finish(ofproto, ofm, req);
         break;
     case OFPFC_DELETE:
@@ -7990,6 +8020,8 @@ ofproto_flow_mod_finish(struct ofproto *ofproto, struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm,
     if (req) {
         ofconn_report_flow_mod(req->ofconn, ofm->command);
     }
+
+    return error;
}
 /* Commit phases (all while locking ofproto_mutex):
@@ -8073,11 +8105,9 @@ do_bundle_commit(struct ofconn *ofconn, uint32_t id, uint16_t flags)
         if (error) {
             /* Send error referring to the original message. */
-            if (error) {
-                ofconn_send_error(ofconn, be->msg, error);
-                error = OFPERR_OFPBFC_MSG_FAILED;
-            }
-
+            ofconn_send_error(ofconn, be->msg, error);
+            error = OFPERR_OFPBFC_MSG_FAILED;
+
             /* 2. Revert.  Undo all the changes made above. */
             LIST_FOR_EACH_REVERSE_CONTINUE(be, node, &bundle->msg_list) {
                 if (be->type == OFPTYPE_FLOW_MOD) {
@@ -8119,13 +8149,34 @@ do_bundle_commit(struct ofconn *ofconn, uint32_t id, uint16_t flags)
                     struct openflow_mod_requester req = { ofconn, be->msg };
                     if (be->type == OFPTYPE_FLOW_MOD) {
-                        ofproto_flow_mod_finish(ofproto, &be->ofm, &req);
+                        error = ofproto_flow_mod_finish(ofproto, &be->ofm,
+                                                        &req);
                     } else if (be->type == OFPTYPE_GROUP_MOD) {
                         ofproto_group_mod_finish(ofproto, &be->ogm, &req);
                     } else if (be->type == OFPTYPE_PACKET_OUT) {
                         ofproto_packet_out_finish(ofproto, &be->opo);
                     }
                 }
+                if (error) {
+                    break;
+                }
+            }
+            if (error) {
+                /* Send error referring to the original message. */
+                ofconn_send_error(ofconn, be->msg, error);
+                error = OFPERR_OFPBFC_MSG_FAILED;
+
+                /* Revert.  Undo all the changes made above. */
+                LIST_FOR_EACH_REVERSE_CONTINUE (be, node, &bundle->msg_list) {
+                    if (be->type == OFPTYPE_FLOW_MOD) {
+                        ofproto_flow_mod_revert(ofproto, &be->ofm);
+                    } else if (be->type == OFPTYPE_GROUP_MOD) {
+                        ofproto_group_mod_revert(ofproto, &be->ogm);
+                    } else if (be->type == OFPTYPE_PACKET_OUT) {
+                        ofproto_packet_out_revert(ofproto, &be->opo);
+                    }
+                    /* Nothing needs to be reverted for a port mod. */
+                }
             }
         }

Comments

Ben Pfaff April 24, 2019, 12:06 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:44:25AM +0000, Aravind.Sridharan@dell.com wrote:
> Currently, rule_insert() API does not have return value. There are
> some possible scenarios where rule insertions can fail at run-time
> even though the static checks during rule_construct() had passed
> previously.
> Some possible scenarios for failure of rule insertions:
> **) Rule insertions can fail dynamically in Hybrid mode (both
> Openflow and Normal switch functioning coexist) where the
> CAM space could get suddenly filled up by Normal switch
> functioning and Openflow gets devoid of available space.
> **) Some deployments could have separate independent layers for
> HW rule insertions and application layer to interact with OVS.
> HW layer could face any dynamic issue during rule handling which
> application could not have predicted/captured in
> rule-construction phase.
> Rule-insert errors for bundles are handled too in this pull-request.

Thanks.

Applied to master.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
index f0d387c..110789e 100644
--- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
+++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
@@ -4443,7 +4443,7 @@  rule_construct(struct rule *rule_)
     return 0;
}
-static void
+static enum ofperr
rule_insert(struct rule *rule_, struct rule *old_rule_, bool forward_counts)
     OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex)
{
@@ -4473,6 +4473,8 @@  rule_insert(struct rule *rule_, struct rule *old_rule_, bool forward_counts)
         ovs_mutex_unlock(&rule->stats_mutex);
         ovs_mutex_unlock(&old_rule->stats_mutex);
     }
+
+    return 0;
}
 static void
diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-provider.h b/ofproto/ofproto-provider.h
index eb62a8f..7907d4b 100644
--- a/ofproto/ofproto-provider.h
+++ b/ofproto/ofproto-provider.h
@@ -1329,8 +1329,8 @@  struct ofproto_class {
     struct rule *(*rule_alloc)(void);
     enum ofperr (*rule_construct)(struct rule *rule)
         /* OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex) */;
-    void (*rule_insert)(struct rule *rule, struct rule *old_rule,
-                        bool forward_counts)
+    enum ofperr (*rule_insert)(struct rule *rule, struct rule *old_rule,
+                               bool forward_counts)
         /* OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex) */;
     void (*rule_delete)(struct rule *rule) /* OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex) */;
     void (*rule_destruct)(struct rule *rule);
@@ -1984,7 +1984,7 @@  enum ofperr ofproto_flow_mod_learn_start(struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm)
     OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex);
void ofproto_flow_mod_learn_revert(struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm)
     OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex);
-void ofproto_flow_mod_learn_finish(struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm,
+enum ofperr ofproto_flow_mod_learn_finish(struct ofproto_flow_mod *ofm,
                                           struct ofproto *orig_ofproto)
     OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex);
void ofproto_add_flow(struct ofproto *, const struct match *, int priority,
diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto.c b/ofproto/ofproto.c
index 3579aac..1d6fc00 100644
--- a/ofproto/ofproto.c
+++ b/ofproto/ofproto.c
@@ -247,10 +247,10 @@  static void replace_rule_revert(struct ofproto *, struct rule *old_rule,
                                 struct rule *new_rule)
     OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex);
-static void replace_rule_finish(struct ofproto *, struct ofproto_flow_mod *,
-                                const struct openflow_mod_requester *,
-                                struct rule *old_rule, struct rule *new_rule,
-                                struct ovs_list *dead_cookies)
+static enum ofperr replace_rule_finish(struct ofproto *, struct ofproto_flow_mod *,
+                                       const struct openflow_mod_requester *,
+                                       struct rule *old_rule, struct rule *new_rule,
+                                       struct ovs_list *dead_cookies)
     OVS_REQUIRES(ofproto_mutex);
static void delete_flows__(struct rule_collection *,
                            enum ofp_flow_removed_reason,
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@  static enum ofperr ofproto_flow_mod_start(struct ofproto *,