diff mbox series

[ovs-dev,v12] ofproto-dpif-upcall: Don't set statistics to 0 when they jump back

Message ID 20230525133745.314125-1-bnemeth@redhat.com
State Changes Requested
Headers show
Series [ovs-dev,v12] ofproto-dpif-upcall: Don't set statistics to 0 when they jump back | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
ovsrobot/apply-robot success apply and check: success
ovsrobot/github-robot-_Build_and_Test fail github build: failed

Commit Message

Balazs Nemeth May 25, 2023, 1:37 p.m. UTC
The only way that stats->{n_packets,n_bytes} would decrease is due to an
overflow, or if there are bugs in how statistics are handled. In the
past, there were multiple issues that caused a jump backward. A
workaround was in place to set the statistics to 0 in that case. When
this happened while the revalidator was under heavy load, the workaround
had an unintended side effect where should_revalidate returned false
causing the flow to be removed because the metric it calculated was
based on a bogus value. Since many of those bugs have now been
identified and resolved, there is no need to set the statistics to 0. In
addition, the (unlikely) overflow still needs to be handled
appropriately. If an unexpected jump does happen, just log it as a
warning.

Signed-off-by: Balazs Nemeth <bnemeth@redhat.com>
---
 ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Ilya Maximets May 25, 2023, 5:31 p.m. UTC | #1
On 5/25/23 15:37, Balazs Nemeth wrote:
> The only way that stats->{n_packets,n_bytes} would decrease is due to an
> overflow, or if there are bugs in how statistics are handled. In the
> past, there were multiple issues that caused a jump backward. A
> workaround was in place to set the statistics to 0 in that case. When
> this happened while the revalidator was under heavy load, the workaround
> had an unintended side effect where should_revalidate returned false
> causing the flow to be removed because the metric it calculated was
> based on a bogus value. Since many of those bugs have now been
> identified and resolved, there is no need to set the statistics to 0. In
> addition, the (unlikely) overflow still needs to be handled
> appropriately. If an unexpected jump does happen, just log it as a
> warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Balazs Nemeth <bnemeth@redhat.com>
> ---
>  ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
> index cd57fdbd9..4c34d695e 100644
> --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
> +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
> @@ -2339,6 +2339,26 @@ exit:
>      return result;
>  }
>  
> +static void
> +log_unexpected_stats_jump(struct udpif_key *ukey,
> +                          const struct dpif_flow_stats *stats)

We need to add a thread-safety annotation here to make clang happy:

    OVS_REQUIRES(ukey->mutex)

> +{
> +    static struct vlog_rate_limit rll = VLOG_RATE_LIMIT_INIT(1, 5);
> +    struct ds ds = DS_EMPTY_INITIALIZER;
> +    struct ofpbuf *actions;
> +
> +    odp_format_ufid(&ukey->ufid, &ds);
> +    ds_put_cstr(&ds, " ");
> +    odp_flow_key_format(ukey->key, ukey->key_len, &ds);
> +    ds_put_cstr(&ds, ", actions:");
> +    actions = ovsrcu_get(struct ofpbuf *, &ukey->actions);
> +    format_odp_actions(&ds, actions->data, actions->size, NULL);
> +    VLOG_WARN_RL(&rll, "Unexpected jump in packet stats from %"PRIu64
> +            " to %"PRIu64" when handling ukey %s",
> +            stats->n_packets, ukey->stats.n_packets, ds_cstr(&ds));

And stats should be in the opposite order.  The jump is from ukey->stats.n_packets
to stats->n_packets, not the other way around.  Sorry I missed that before.

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
index cd57fdbd9..4c34d695e 100644
--- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
+++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
@@ -2339,6 +2339,26 @@  exit:
     return result;
 }
 
+static void
+log_unexpected_stats_jump(struct udpif_key *ukey,
+                          const struct dpif_flow_stats *stats)
+{
+    static struct vlog_rate_limit rll = VLOG_RATE_LIMIT_INIT(1, 5);
+    struct ds ds = DS_EMPTY_INITIALIZER;
+    struct ofpbuf *actions;
+
+    odp_format_ufid(&ukey->ufid, &ds);
+    ds_put_cstr(&ds, " ");
+    odp_flow_key_format(ukey->key, ukey->key_len, &ds);
+    ds_put_cstr(&ds, ", actions:");
+    actions = ovsrcu_get(struct ofpbuf *, &ukey->actions);
+    format_odp_actions(&ds, actions->data, actions->size, NULL);
+    VLOG_WARN_RL(&rll, "Unexpected jump in packet stats from %"PRIu64
+            " to %"PRIu64" when handling ukey %s",
+            stats->n_packets, ukey->stats.n_packets, ds_cstr(&ds));
+    ds_destroy(&ds);
+}
+
 /* Verifies that the datapath actions of 'ukey' are still correct, and pushes
  * 'stats' for it.
  *
@@ -2372,18 +2392,15 @@  revalidate_ukey(struct udpif *udpif, struct udpif_key *ukey,
 
     push.used = stats->used;
     push.tcp_flags = stats->tcp_flags;
-    push.n_packets = (stats->n_packets > ukey->stats.n_packets
-                      ? stats->n_packets - ukey->stats.n_packets
-                      : 0);
-    push.n_bytes = (stats->n_bytes > ukey->stats.n_bytes
-                    ? stats->n_bytes - ukey->stats.n_bytes
-                    : 0);
+    push.n_packets = stats->n_packets - ukey->stats.n_packets;
+    push.n_bytes = stats->n_bytes - ukey->stats.n_bytes;
 
     if (stats->n_packets < ukey->stats.n_packets &&
         ukey->stats.n_packets < UINT64_THREE_QUARTERS) {
         /* Report cases where the packet counter is lower than the previous
          * instance, but exclude the potential wrapping of an uint64_t. */
         COVERAGE_INC(ukey_invalid_stat_reset);
+        log_unexpected_stats_jump(ukey, stats);
     }
 
     if (need_revalidate) {