diff --git a/ovn/northd/ovn-northd.8.xml b/ovn/northd/ovn-northd.8.xml
index df53d4c..9c61f66 100644
--- a/ovn/northd/ovn-northd.8.xml
+++ b/ovn/northd/ovn-northd.8.xml
@@ -435,20 +435,75 @@
     <h3>Ingress Table 10: ARP/ND responder</h3>
 
     <p>
-      This table implements ARP/ND responder for known IPs.  It contains these
-      logical flows:
+      This table implements ARP/ND responder in a logical switch for known
+      IPs.  The advantage of the ARP responder flow is to limit ARP
+      broadcasts by locally responding to ARP requests without the need to
+      send to other hypervisors.  One common case is when the inport is a
+      logical port associated with a VIF and the broadcast is responded to
+      on the local hypervisor rather than broadcast across the whole
+      network and responded to by the destination VM.  This behavior is
+      proxy ARP.
     </p>
 
+    <p>
+      ARP requests arrive from VMs from a logical switch inport of type
+      default.  For this case, the logical switch proxy ARP rules can be
+      for other VMs or logical router ports.  Logical switch proxy ARP
+      rules may be programmed both for mac binding of IP addresses on
+      other logical switch VIF ports (which are of the default logical
+      switch port type, representing connectivity to VMs or containers),
+      and for mac binding of IP addresses on logical switch router type
+      ports, representing their logical router port peers.  In order to
+      support proxy ARP for logical router ports, an IP address must be
+      configured on the logical switch router type port, with the same
+      value as the peer logical router port.  The configured MAC addresses
+      must match as well.  When a VM sends an ARP request for a distributed
+      logical router port and if the peer router type port of the attached
+      logical switch does not have an IP address configured, the ARP request
+      will be broadcast on the logical switch.  One of the copies of the ARP
+      request will go through the logical switch router type port to the
+      logical router datapath, where the logical router ARP responder will
+      generate a reply.  The MAC binding of a distributed logical router,
+      once learned by an associated VM, is used for all that VM's
+      communication needing routing.  Hence, the action of a VM re-arping for
+      the mac binding of the logical router port should be rare.
+    </p>
+
+    <p>
+      Logical switch ARP responder proxy ARP rules can also be hit when
+      receiving ARP requests externally on a L2 gateway port.  In this case,
+      the hypervisor acting as an L2 gateway, responds to the ARP request on
+      behalf of a destination VM.
+    </p>
+
+    <p>
+      Note that ARP requests received from <code>localnet</code> or
+      <code>vtep</code> logical inports can either go directly to VMs, in
+      which case the VM responds or can hit an ARP responder for a logical
+      router port if the packet is used to resolve a logical router port
+      next hop address.  In either case, logical switch ARP responder rules
+      will not be hit.  It contains these logical flows:
+     </p>
+
     <ul>
       <li>
-        Priority-100 flows to skip ARP responder if inport is of type
-        <code>localnet</code>, and advances directly to the next table.
+        Priority-100 flows to skip the ARP responder if inport is of type
+        <code>localnet</code> or <code>vtep</code> and advances directly
+        to the next table.  ARP requests sent to <code>localnet</code> or
+        <code>vtep</code> ports can be received by multiple hypervisors.
+        Now, because the same mac binding rules are downloaded to all
+        hypervisors, each of the multiple hypervisors will respond.  This
+        will confuse L2 learning on the source of the ARP requests.  ARP
+        requests received on an inport of type <code>router</code> are not
+        expected to hit any logical switch ARP responder flows.  However,
+        no skip flows are installed for these packets, as there would be
+        some additional flow cost for this and the value appears limited.
       </li>
 
       <li>
         <p>
           Priority-50 flows that match ARP requests to each known IP address
-          <var>A</var> of every logical router port, and respond with ARP
+          <var>A</var> of every logical switch port, and respond with ARP
           replies directly with corresponding Ethernet address <var>E</var>:
         </p>
 
@@ -475,7 +530,7 @@ output;
         <p>
           Priority-50 flows that match IPv6 ND neighbor solicitations to
           each known IP address <var>A</var> (and <var>A</var>'s
-          solicited node address) of every logical router port, and
+          solicited node address) of every logical switch port, and
           respond with neighbor advertisements directly with
           corresponding Ethernet address <var>E</var>:
         </p>
