Message ID | 1469570208-24192-1-git-send-email-wei1.shen@intel.com |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Daniele Di Proietto |
Headers | show |
Thanks for the patch. We never accepted the 0x prefix for pmd-cpu-mask, but I guess there's no harm in doing it and it might make user's life easier. We always use braces, even for single statement, please read CodingStyle.md https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/CodingStyle.md#statements I cannot merge this unless you provide a signoff, the details and the meaning is explained here: https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#developers-certificate-of-origin Thanks, Daniele 2016-07-26 14:56 GMT-07:00 Wei Shen <wei1.shen@intel.com>: > Fixed a minor bug that would print out a confusing warning about core mask, > "ovs_numa|WARN|Invalid cpu mask: x", when dpdl-lcore-mask has 0x prefix, > e.g. > 0x123, which is the convention used in INSTALL.DPDK.md. > --- > lib/ovs-numa.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/ovs-numa.c b/lib/ovs-numa.c > index c8173e0..c1938eb 100644 > --- a/lib/ovs-numa.c > +++ b/lib/ovs-numa.c > @@ -551,6 +551,10 @@ ovs_numa_set_cpu_mask(const char *cmask) > return; > } > > + /* Skip 0x if supplied in the cmask */ > + if (!strncmp(cmask, "0x", 2)) > + cmask += 2; > + > for (i = strlen(cmask) - 1; i >= 0; i--) { > char hex = toupper((unsigned char)cmask[i]); > int bin, j; > -- > 2.5.5 > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >
diff --git a/lib/ovs-numa.c b/lib/ovs-numa.c index c8173e0..c1938eb 100644 --- a/lib/ovs-numa.c +++ b/lib/ovs-numa.c @@ -551,6 +551,10 @@ ovs_numa_set_cpu_mask(const char *cmask) return; } + /* Skip 0x if supplied in the cmask */ + if (!strncmp(cmask, "0x", 2)) + cmask += 2; + for (i = strlen(cmask) - 1; i >= 0; i--) { char hex = toupper((unsigned char)cmask[i]); int bin, j;