Message ID | 170073542415.369846.11111021082150317170.stgit@ebuild |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ci: Add remaining check tests to GitHub actions. | expand |
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:30:35AM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote: > This set of patches incorporates the remaining make check tests into > the GitHub action run. Notably, this inclusion does not appear to > extend the overall run time, as the newly added tests complete prior > to the existing ones. > > Eelco Chaudron (8): > ci: Add make check-ovsdb-cluster tests to GitHub action ci. > ci: Add make check-kernel to GitHub actions ci. > ci: Add make check-offloads to GitHub actions ci. > ci: Add make check-system-userspace to GitHub actions ci. > ci: Add make check-system-tso to GitHub actions ci. > ci: Allow make check-dpdk to run more tests. > ci: Add make check-afxdp to GitHub actions ci. > ci: Exclude tests that show random failures through GitHub actions. Hi Eelco, I am seeing some CI failures with this series, is this something we should be concerned about? https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=383524&state=%2A&archive=both
On 24 Nov 2023, at 11:29, Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:30:35AM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote: >> This set of patches incorporates the remaining make check tests into >> the GitHub action run. Notably, this inclusion does not appear to >> extend the overall run time, as the newly added tests complete prior >> to the existing ones. >> >> Eelco Chaudron (8): >> ci: Add make check-ovsdb-cluster tests to GitHub action ci. >> ci: Add make check-kernel to GitHub actions ci. >> ci: Add make check-offloads to GitHub actions ci. >> ci: Add make check-system-userspace to GitHub actions ci. >> ci: Add make check-system-tso to GitHub actions ci. >> ci: Allow make check-dpdk to run more tests. >> ci: Add make check-afxdp to GitHub actions ci. >> ci: Exclude tests that show random failures through GitHub actions. > > Hi Eelco, > > I am seeing some CI failures with this series, is this > something we should be concerned about? > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=383524&state=%2A&archive=both Yes, we should (some of them :) There is an issue in the cache key generation for the DPDK cached builds. Discussed this yesterday with David, and will sent a v2 today or next week with an addition patch to fix this. //Eelco