@@ -351,8 +351,8 @@ ip_set_init_comment(struct ip_set *set, struct ip_set_comment *comment,
if (unlikely(c)) {
set->ext_size -= sizeof(*c) + strlen(c->str) + 1;
- kfree_rcu(c, rcu);
rcu_assign_pointer(comment->c, NULL);
+ kfree_rcu(c, rcu);
}
if (!len)
return;
@@ -393,8 +393,8 @@ ip_set_comment_free(struct ip_set *set, void *ptr)
if (unlikely(!c))
return;
set->ext_size -= sizeof(*c) + strlen(c->str) + 1;
- kfree_rcu(c, rcu);
rcu_assign_pointer(comment->c, NULL);
+ kfree_rcu(c, rcu);
}
typedef void (*destroyer)(struct ip_set *, void *);
Sashiko pointed out that kfree_rcu() was called before rcu_assign_pointer() in handling the comment extension. Fix the order so that rcu_assign_pointer() called first. Signed-off-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org> --- net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)