From patchwork Fri Nov 20 08:26:10 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Wang Hai X-Patchwork-Id: 1403512 X-Patchwork-Delegate: pablo@netfilter.org Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=23.128.96.18; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CcqN62kCJz9s1l for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 19:24:38 +1100 (AEDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727043AbgKTIXj (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2020 03:23:39 -0500 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:7708 "EHLO szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725766AbgKTIXj (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2020 03:23:39 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CcqLJ0WTSzkYwy; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:23:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.113.133) by DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:23:19 +0800 From: Wang Hai To: , , , , , , , , CC: , , , , Subject: [PATCH net v2] ipvs: fix possible memory leak in ip_vs_control_net_init Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:26:10 +0800 Message-ID: <20201120082610.60917-1-wanghai38@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.113.133] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org kmemleak report a memory leak as follows: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff8880759ea000 (size 256): comm "syz-executor.3", pid 6484, jiffies 4297476946 (age 48.546s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 08 a0 9e 75 80 88 ff ff ...........u.... 08 a0 9e 75 80 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de ...u.........N.. backtrace: [<00000000c0bf2deb>] kmem_cache_zalloc include/linux/slab.h:656 [inline] [<00000000c0bf2deb>] __proc_create+0x23d/0x7d0 fs/proc/generic.c:421 [<000000009d718d02>] proc_create_reg+0x8e/0x140 fs/proc/generic.c:535 [<0000000097bbfc4f>] proc_create_net_data+0x8c/0x1b0 fs/proc/proc_net.c:126 [<00000000652480fc>] ip_vs_control_net_init+0x308/0x13a0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4169 [<000000004c927ebe>] __ip_vs_init+0x211/0x400 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2429 [<00000000aa6b72d9>] ops_init+0xa8/0x3c0 net/core/net_namespace.c:151 [<00000000153fd114>] setup_net+0x2de/0x7e0 net/core/net_namespace.c:341 [<00000000be4e4f07>] copy_net_ns+0x27d/0x530 net/core/net_namespace.c:482 [<00000000f1c23ec9>] create_new_namespaces+0x382/0xa30 kernel/nsproxy.c:110 [<00000000098a5757>] copy_namespaces+0x2e6/0x3b0 kernel/nsproxy.c:179 [<0000000026ce39e9>] copy_process+0x220a/0x5f00 kernel/fork.c:2072 [<00000000b71f4efe>] _do_fork+0xc7/0xda0 kernel/fork.c:2428 [<000000002974ee96>] __do_sys_clone3+0x18a/0x280 kernel/fork.c:2703 [<0000000062ac0a4d>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 [<0000000093f1ce2c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 In the error path of ip_vs_control_net_init(), remove_proc_entry() needs to be called to remove the added proc entry, otherwise a memory leak will occur. Also, add some '#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS' because proc_create_net* return NULL when PROC is not used. Fixes: b17fc9963f83 ("IPVS: netns, ip_vs_stats and its procfs") Fixes: 61b1ab4583e2 ("IPVS: netns, add basic init per netns.") Reported-by: Hulk Robot Signed-off-by: Wang Hai --- v1->v2: add some '#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS' and check the return value of proc_create_net* net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c index e279ded4e306..c00394ba20db 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c @@ -4167,12 +4167,17 @@ int __net_init ip_vs_control_net_init(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs) spin_lock_init(&ipvs->tot_stats.lock); - proc_create_net("ip_vs", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, &ip_vs_info_seq_ops, - sizeof(struct ip_vs_iter)); - proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, - ip_vs_stats_show, NULL); - proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats_percpu", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, - ip_vs_stats_percpu_show, NULL); +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS + if (!proc_create_net("ip_vs", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, &ip_vs_info_seq_ops, + sizeof(struct ip_vs_iter))) + goto err_vs; + if (!proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, + ip_vs_stats_show, NULL)) + goto err_stats; + if (!proc_create_net_single("ip_vs_stats_percpu", 0, ipvs->net->proc_net, + ip_vs_stats_percpu_show, NULL)) + goto err_percpu; +#endif if (ip_vs_control_net_init_sysctl(ipvs)) goto err; @@ -4180,6 +4185,14 @@ int __net_init ip_vs_control_net_init(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs) return 0; err: +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats_percpu", ipvs->net->proc_net); +err_percpu: + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats", ipvs->net->proc_net); +err_stats: + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs", ipvs->net->proc_net); +err_vs: +#endif free_percpu(ipvs->tot_stats.cpustats); return -ENOMEM; } @@ -4188,9 +4201,11 @@ void __net_exit ip_vs_control_net_cleanup(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs) { ip_vs_trash_cleanup(ipvs); ip_vs_control_net_cleanup_sysctl(ipvs); +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats_percpu", ipvs->net->proc_net); remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats", ipvs->net->proc_net); remove_proc_entry("ip_vs", ipvs->net->proc_net); +#endif free_percpu(ipvs->tot_stats.cpustats); }