| Message ID | 5fa8e9d4.1c69fb81.5d889.5c64@mx.google.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Delegated to: | David Miller |
| Headers | show |
| Series | net: sched: fix misspellings using misspell-fixer tool | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| jkicinski/cover_letter | success | Link |
| jkicinski/fixes_present | success | Link |
| jkicinski/patch_count | success | Link |
| jkicinski/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be net-next |
| jkicinski/subject_prefix | warning | Target tree name not specified in the subject |
| jkicinski/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| jkicinski/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
| jkicinski/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| jkicinski/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 14 this patch: 14 |
| jkicinski/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| jkicinski/verify_fixes | success | Link |
| jkicinski/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 40 lines checked |
| jkicinski/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 14 this patch: 14 |
| jkicinski/header_inline | success | Link |
| jkicinski/stable | success | Stable not CCed |
menglong8.dong@ wrote: > From: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte.com.cn> > > Some typos are found out by misspell-fixer tool: > > $ misspell-fixer -rnv ./net/sched/ > ./net/sched/act_api.c:686 > ./net/sched/act_bpf.c:68 > ./net/sched/cls_rsvp.h:241 > ./net/sched/em_cmp.c:44 > ./net/sched/sch_pie.c:408 > > Fix typos found by misspell-fixer. > > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte.com.cn> > --- Hi, you will want to add net-next to the [PATCH *] line next time to make it clear this is for net-next. The contents make it obvious in this case though. Also I'm not sure why the bpf@ include but OK. Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Hi, John. On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 5:23 AM John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, you will want to add net-next to the [PATCH *] line next time > to make it clear this is for net-next. The contents make it > obvious in this case though. > > Also I'm not sure why the bpf@ include but OK. Thanks for your suggestion, and I will pay attention to the [PATCH *] next time. As for the bpf@, I guess that 'get_maintainer.pl' listed it to me because of 'act_bpf.c'. Cheers, Menglong Dong
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 02:02:17 -0500 menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote: > From: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte.com.cn> > > Some typos are found out by misspell-fixer tool: > > $ misspell-fixer -rnv ./net/sched/ > ./net/sched/act_api.c:686 > ./net/sched/act_bpf.c:68 > ./net/sched/cls_rsvp.h:241 > ./net/sched/em_cmp.c:44 > ./net/sched/sch_pie.c:408 > > Fix typos found by misspell-fixer. > > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte.com.cn> Applied, thanks.
diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c index 1341c59c2f40..60e1572ba606 100644 --- a/net/sched/act_api.c +++ b/net/sched/act_api.c @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static struct tc_action_ops *tc_lookup_action(struct nlattr *kind) return res; } -/*TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO is 32, there count upto 32 */ +/*TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO is 32, there count up to 32 */ #define TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO_MASK 0x1FF int tcf_action_exec(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action **actions, int nr_actions, struct tcf_result *res) diff --git a/net/sched/act_bpf.c b/net/sched/act_bpf.c index a4c7ba35a343..e48e980c3b93 100644 --- a/net/sched/act_bpf.c +++ b/net/sched/act_bpf.c @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int tcf_bpf_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *act, * In case a different well-known TC_ACT opcode has been * returned, it will overwrite the default one. * - * For everything else that is unkown, TC_ACT_UNSPEC is + * For everything else that is unknown, TC_ACT_UNSPEC is * returned. */ switch (filter_res) { diff --git a/net/sched/cls_rsvp.h b/net/sched/cls_rsvp.h index d36949d9382c..2e288f88ff02 100644 --- a/net/sched/cls_rsvp.h +++ b/net/sched/cls_rsvp.h @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static void rsvp_replace(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct rsvp_filter *n, u32 h) } } - /* Something went wrong if we are trying to replace a non-existant + /* Something went wrong if we are trying to replace a non-existent * node. Mind as well halt instead of silently failing. */ BUG_ON(1); diff --git a/net/sched/em_cmp.c b/net/sched/em_cmp.c index a4d09b1fb66a..f17b049ea530 100644 --- a/net/sched/em_cmp.c +++ b/net/sched/em_cmp.c @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static int em_cmp_match(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tcf_ematch *em, break; case TCF_EM_ALIGN_U32: - /* Worth checking boundries? The branching seems + /* Worth checking boundaries? The branching seems * to get worse. Visit again. */ val = get_unaligned_be32(ptr); diff --git a/net/sched/sch_pie.c b/net/sched/sch_pie.c index c65077f0c0f3..5a457ff61acd 100644 --- a/net/sched/sch_pie.c +++ b/net/sched/sch_pie.c @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ void pie_calculate_probability(struct pie_params *params, struct pie_vars *vars, /* We restart the measurement cycle if the following conditions are met * 1. If the delay has been low for 2 consecutive Tupdate periods * 2. Calculated drop probability is zero - * 3. If average dq_rate_estimator is enabled, we have atleast one + * 3. If average dq_rate_estimator is enabled, we have at least one * estimate for the avg_dq_rate ie., is a non-zero value */ if ((vars->qdelay < params->target / 2) &&