diff mbox series

[v4,bpf,2/2] selftests/bpf: extend map-in-map selftest to detect memory leaks

Message ID 20200729040913.2815687-2-andriin@fb.com
State Accepted
Delegated to: BPF Maintainers
Headers show
Series [v4,bpf,1/2] bpf: fix map leak in HASH_OF_MAPS map | expand

Commit Message

Andrii Nakryiko July 29, 2020, 4:09 a.m. UTC
Add test validating that all inner maps are released properly after skeleton
is destroyed. To ensure determinism, trigger kernel-side synchronize_rcu()
before checking map existence by their IDs.

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Comments

Jakub Sitnicki July 29, 2020, 2:29 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:09 AM CEST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Add test validating that all inner maps are released properly after skeleton
> is destroyed. To ensure determinism, trigger kernel-side synchronize_rcu()
> before checking map existence by their IDs.
>
> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> index f7ee8fa377ad..f6eee3fb933c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> @@ -5,10 +5,60 @@
>
>  #include "test_btf_map_in_map.skel.h"
>
> +static int duration;
> +
> +static __u32 bpf_map_id(struct bpf_map *map)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_map_info info;
> +	__u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> +	int err;
> +
> +	memset(&info, 0, info_len);
> +	err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(bpf_map__fd(map), &info, &info_len);
> +	if (err)
> +		return 0;
> +	return info.id;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Trigger synchronize_cpu() in kernel.

Nit: synchronize_*r*cu().

> + *
> + * ARRAY_OF_MAPS/HASH_OF_MAPS lookup/update operations trigger
> + * synchronize_rcu(), if looking up/updating non-NULL element. Use this fact
> + * to trigger synchronize_cpu(): create map-in-map, create a trivial ARRAY
> + * map, update map-in-map with ARRAY inner map. Then cleanup. At the end, at
> + * least one synchronize_rcu() would be called.
> + */

That's a cool trick. I'm a bit confused by "looking up/updating non-NULL
element". It looks like you're updating an element that is NULL/unset in
the code below. What am I missing?

> +static int kern_sync_rcu(void)
> +{
> +	int inner_map_fd, outer_map_fd, err, zero = 0;
> +
> +	inner_map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, 4, 4, 1, 0);
> +	if (CHECK(inner_map_fd < 0, "inner_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno))
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	outer_map_fd = bpf_create_map_in_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, NULL,
> +					     sizeof(int), inner_map_fd, 1, 0);
> +	if (CHECK(outer_map_fd < 0, "outer_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno)) {
> +		close(inner_map_fd);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_map_fd, &zero, &inner_map_fd, 0);
> +	if (err)
> +		err = -errno;
> +	CHECK(err, "outer_map_update", "failed %d\n", err);
> +	close(inner_map_fd);
> +	close(outer_map_fd);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>  void test_btf_map_in_map(void)
>  {
> -	int duration = 0, err, key = 0, val;
> -	struct test_btf_map_in_map* skel;
> +	int err, key = 0, val, i;
> +	struct test_btf_map_in_map *skel;
> +	int outer_arr_fd, outer_hash_fd;
> +	int fd, map1_fd, map2_fd, map1_id, map2_id;
>
>  	skel = test_btf_map_in_map__open_and_load();
>  	if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed to open&load skeleton\n"))
> @@ -18,32 +68,78 @@ void test_btf_map_in_map(void)
>  	if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attach failed: %d\n", err))
>  		goto cleanup;
>
> +	map1_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> +	map2_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> +	outer_arr_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr);
> +	outer_hash_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash);
> +
>  	/* inner1 = input, inner2 = input + 1 */
> -	val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> -	bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr), &key, &val, 0);
> -	val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> -	bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash), &key, &val, 0);
> +	map1_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> +	bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &map1_fd, 0);
> +	map2_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> +	bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &map2_fd, 0);
>  	skel->bss->input = 1;
>  	usleep(1);
>
> -	bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1), &key, &val);
> +	bpf_map_lookup_elem(map1_fd, &key, &val);
>  	CHECK(val != 1, "inner1", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 1);
> -	bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2), &key, &val);
> +	bpf_map_lookup_elem(map2_fd, &key, &val);
>  	CHECK(val != 2, "inner2", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 2);
>
>  	/* inner1 = input + 1, inner2 = input */
> -	val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> -	bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr), &key, &val, 0);
> -	val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> -	bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash), &key, &val, 0);
> +	bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &map2_fd, 0);
> +	bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &map1_fd, 0);
>  	skel->bss->input = 3;
>  	usleep(1);
>
> -	bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1), &key, &val);
> +	bpf_map_lookup_elem(map1_fd, &key, &val);
>  	CHECK(val != 4, "inner1", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 4);
> -	bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2), &key, &val);
> +	bpf_map_lookup_elem(map2_fd, &key, &val);
>  	CHECK(val != 3, "inner2", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 3);
>
> +	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> +		val = i % 2 ? map1_fd : map2_fd;
> +		err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &val, 0);
> +		if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) {
> +			printf("failed to update hash_of_maps on iter #%d\n", i);
> +			goto cleanup;
> +		}
> +		err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &val, 0);
> +		if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) {
> +			printf("failed to update hash_of_maps on iter #%d\n", i);
> +			goto cleanup;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	map1_id = bpf_map_id(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> +	map2_id = bpf_map_id(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> +	CHECK(map1_id == 0, "map1_id", "failed to get ID 1\n");
> +	CHECK(map2_id == 0, "map2_id", "failed to get ID 2\n");
> +
> +	test_btf_map_in_map__destroy(skel);
> +	skel = NULL;
> +
> +	/* we need to either wait for or force synchronize_rcu(), before
> +	 * checking for "still exists" condition, otherwise map could still be
> +	 * resolvable by ID, causing false positives.
> +	 *
> +	 * Older kernels (5.8 and earlier) freed map only after two
> +	 * synchronize_rcu()s, so trigger two, to be entirely sure.
> +	 */
> +	CHECK(kern_sync_rcu(), "sync_rcu", "failed\n");
> +	CHECK(kern_sync_rcu(), "sync_rcu", "failed\n");
> +
> +	fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map1_id);
> +	if (CHECK(fd >= 0, "map1_leak", "inner_map1 leaked!\n")) {
> +		close(fd);
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	}
> +	fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map2_id);
> +	if (CHECK(fd >= 0, "map2_leak", "inner_map2 leaked!\n")) {
> +		close(fd);
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	}
> +
>  cleanup:
>  	test_btf_map_in_map__destroy(skel);
>  }
Andrii Nakryiko July 29, 2020, 5:48 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:29 AM Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:09 AM CEST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > Add test validating that all inner maps are released properly after skeleton
> > is destroyed. To ensure determinism, trigger kernel-side synchronize_rcu()
> > before checking map existence by their IDs.
> >
> > Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
> > ---
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> > index f7ee8fa377ad..f6eee3fb933c 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> > @@ -5,10 +5,60 @@
> >
> >  #include "test_btf_map_in_map.skel.h"
> >
> > +static int duration;
> > +
> > +static __u32 bpf_map_id(struct bpf_map *map)
> > +{
> > +     struct bpf_map_info info;
> > +     __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> > +     int err;
> > +
> > +     memset(&info, 0, info_len);
> > +     err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(bpf_map__fd(map), &info, &info_len);
> > +     if (err)
> > +             return 0;
> > +     return info.id;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Trigger synchronize_cpu() in kernel.
>
> Nit: synchronize_*r*cu().

welp, yeah

>
> > + *
> > + * ARRAY_OF_MAPS/HASH_OF_MAPS lookup/update operations trigger
> > + * synchronize_rcu(), if looking up/updating non-NULL element. Use this fact
> > + * to trigger synchronize_cpu(): create map-in-map, create a trivial ARRAY
> > + * map, update map-in-map with ARRAY inner map. Then cleanup. At the end, at
> > + * least one synchronize_rcu() would be called.
> > + */
>
> That's a cool trick. I'm a bit confused by "looking up/updating non-NULL
> element". It looks like you're updating an element that is NULL/unset in
> the code below. What am I missing?

I was basically trying to say that it has to be a successful lookup or
update. For lookup that means looking up non-NULL (existing) entry.
For update -- setting valid inner map FD.

Not sure fixing this and typo above is worth it to post v5.

>
> > +static int kern_sync_rcu(void)
> > +{
> > +     int inner_map_fd, outer_map_fd, err, zero = 0;
> > +
> > +     inner_map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, 4, 4, 1, 0);
> > +     if (CHECK(inner_map_fd < 0, "inner_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno))
> > +             return -1;
> > +
> > +     outer_map_fd = bpf_create_map_in_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, NULL,
> > +                                          sizeof(int), inner_map_fd, 1, 0);
> > +     if (CHECK(outer_map_fd < 0, "outer_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno)) {
> > +             close(inner_map_fd);
> > +             return -1;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_map_fd, &zero, &inner_map_fd, 0);
> > +     if (err)
> > +             err = -errno;
> > +     CHECK(err, "outer_map_update", "failed %d\n", err);
> > +     close(inner_map_fd);
> > +     close(outer_map_fd);
> > +     return err;
> > +}
> > +

[...]

trimming's good ;)
Jakub Sitnicki July 29, 2020, 8:29 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 07:48 PM CEST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:29 AM Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:09 AM CEST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:

[...]

>> > +/*
>> > + * Trigger synchronize_cpu() in kernel.
>>
>> Nit: synchronize_*r*cu().
>
> welp, yeah
>
>>
>> > + *
>> > + * ARRAY_OF_MAPS/HASH_OF_MAPS lookup/update operations trigger
>> > + * synchronize_rcu(), if looking up/updating non-NULL element. Use this fact
>> > + * to trigger synchronize_cpu(): create map-in-map, create a trivial ARRAY
>> > + * map, update map-in-map with ARRAY inner map. Then cleanup. At the end, at
>> > + * least one synchronize_rcu() would be called.
>> > + */
>>
>> That's a cool trick. I'm a bit confused by "looking up/updating non-NULL
>> element". It looks like you're updating an element that is NULL/unset in
>> the code below. What am I missing?
>
> I was basically trying to say that it has to be a successful lookup or
> update. For lookup that means looking up non-NULL (existing) entry.
> For update -- setting valid inner map FD.
>
> Not sure fixing this and typo above is worth it to post v5.

I just wanted to understand that the helper is working as intended. It
seems handy. I agree that it's not worth respinning the patches just for
this.

>
>>
>> > +static int kern_sync_rcu(void)
>> > +{
>> > +     int inner_map_fd, outer_map_fd, err, zero = 0;
>> > +
>> > +     inner_map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, 4, 4, 1, 0);
>> > +     if (CHECK(inner_map_fd < 0, "inner_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno))
>> > +             return -1;
>> > +
>> > +     outer_map_fd = bpf_create_map_in_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, NULL,
>> > +                                          sizeof(int), inner_map_fd, 1, 0);
>> > +     if (CHECK(outer_map_fd < 0, "outer_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno)) {
>> > +             close(inner_map_fd);
>> > +             return -1;
>> > +     }
>> > +
>> > +     err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_map_fd, &zero, &inner_map_fd, 0);
>> > +     if (err)
>> > +             err = -errno;
>> > +     CHECK(err, "outer_map_update", "failed %d\n", err);
>> > +     close(inner_map_fd);
>> > +     close(outer_map_fd);
>> > +     return err;
>> > +}
>> > +
>
> [...]
>
> trimming's good ;)

You caught me. Just being lazy. No excuses :-)
Daniel Borkmann July 29, 2020, 9:17 p.m. UTC | #4
On 7/29/20 7:48 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:29 AM Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:09 AM CEST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>>> Add test validating that all inner maps are released properly after skeleton
>>> is destroyed. To ensure determinism, trigger kernel-side synchronize_rcu()
>>> before checking map existence by their IDs.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
[...]
>>> +/*
>>> + * Trigger synchronize_cpu() in kernel.
>>
>> Nit: synchronize_*r*cu().
> 
> welp, yeah
> 
>>
>>> + *
>>> + * ARRAY_OF_MAPS/HASH_OF_MAPS lookup/update operations trigger
>>> + * synchronize_rcu(), if looking up/updating non-NULL element. Use this fact
>>> + * to trigger synchronize_cpu(): create map-in-map, create a trivial ARRAY
>>> + * map, update map-in-map with ARRAY inner map. Then cleanup. At the end, at
>>> + * least one synchronize_rcu() would be called.
>>> + */
>>
>> That's a cool trick. I'm a bit confused by "looking up/updating non-NULL
>> element". It looks like you're updating an element that is NULL/unset in
>> the code below. What am I missing?
> 
> I was basically trying to say that it has to be a successful lookup or
> update. For lookup that means looking up non-NULL (existing) entry.
> For update -- setting valid inner map FD.
> 
> Not sure fixing this and typo above is worth it to post v5.

Nope, I'll fix it up while applying.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
index f7ee8fa377ad..f6eee3fb933c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
@@ -5,10 +5,60 @@ 
 
 #include "test_btf_map_in_map.skel.h"
 
+static int duration;
+
+static __u32 bpf_map_id(struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+	struct bpf_map_info info;
+	__u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+	int err;
+
+	memset(&info, 0, info_len);
+	err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(bpf_map__fd(map), &info, &info_len);
+	if (err)
+		return 0;
+	return info.id;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Trigger synchronize_cpu() in kernel.
+ *
+ * ARRAY_OF_MAPS/HASH_OF_MAPS lookup/update operations trigger
+ * synchronize_rcu(), if looking up/updating non-NULL element. Use this fact
+ * to trigger synchronize_cpu(): create map-in-map, create a trivial ARRAY
+ * map, update map-in-map with ARRAY inner map. Then cleanup. At the end, at
+ * least one synchronize_rcu() would be called.
+ */
+static int kern_sync_rcu(void)
+{
+	int inner_map_fd, outer_map_fd, err, zero = 0;
+
+	inner_map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, 4, 4, 1, 0);
+	if (CHECK(inner_map_fd < 0, "inner_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno))
+		return -1;
+
+	outer_map_fd = bpf_create_map_in_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, NULL,
+					     sizeof(int), inner_map_fd, 1, 0);
+	if (CHECK(outer_map_fd < 0, "outer_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno)) {
+		close(inner_map_fd);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_map_fd, &zero, &inner_map_fd, 0);
+	if (err)
+		err = -errno;
+	CHECK(err, "outer_map_update", "failed %d\n", err);
+	close(inner_map_fd);
+	close(outer_map_fd);
+	return err;
+}
+
 void test_btf_map_in_map(void)
 {
-	int duration = 0, err, key = 0, val;
-	struct test_btf_map_in_map* skel;
+	int err, key = 0, val, i;
+	struct test_btf_map_in_map *skel;
+	int outer_arr_fd, outer_hash_fd;
+	int fd, map1_fd, map2_fd, map1_id, map2_id;
 
 	skel = test_btf_map_in_map__open_and_load();
 	if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed to open&load skeleton\n"))
@@ -18,32 +68,78 @@  void test_btf_map_in_map(void)
 	if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attach failed: %d\n", err))
 		goto cleanup;
 
+	map1_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
+	map2_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
+	outer_arr_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr);
+	outer_hash_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash);
+
 	/* inner1 = input, inner2 = input + 1 */
-	val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
-	bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr), &key, &val, 0);
-	val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
-	bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash), &key, &val, 0);
+	map1_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
+	bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &map1_fd, 0);
+	map2_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
+	bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &map2_fd, 0);
 	skel->bss->input = 1;
 	usleep(1);
 
-	bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1), &key, &val);
+	bpf_map_lookup_elem(map1_fd, &key, &val);
 	CHECK(val != 1, "inner1", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 1);
-	bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2), &key, &val);
+	bpf_map_lookup_elem(map2_fd, &key, &val);
 	CHECK(val != 2, "inner2", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 2);
 
 	/* inner1 = input + 1, inner2 = input */
-	val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
-	bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr), &key, &val, 0);
-	val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
-	bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash), &key, &val, 0);
+	bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &map2_fd, 0);
+	bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &map1_fd, 0);
 	skel->bss->input = 3;
 	usleep(1);
 
-	bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1), &key, &val);
+	bpf_map_lookup_elem(map1_fd, &key, &val);
 	CHECK(val != 4, "inner1", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 4);
-	bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2), &key, &val);
+	bpf_map_lookup_elem(map2_fd, &key, &val);
 	CHECK(val != 3, "inner2", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 3);
 
+	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
+		val = i % 2 ? map1_fd : map2_fd;
+		err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &val, 0);
+		if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) {
+			printf("failed to update hash_of_maps on iter #%d\n", i);
+			goto cleanup;
+		}
+		err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &val, 0);
+		if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) {
+			printf("failed to update hash_of_maps on iter #%d\n", i);
+			goto cleanup;
+		}
+	}
+
+	map1_id = bpf_map_id(skel->maps.inner_map1);
+	map2_id = bpf_map_id(skel->maps.inner_map2);
+	CHECK(map1_id == 0, "map1_id", "failed to get ID 1\n");
+	CHECK(map2_id == 0, "map2_id", "failed to get ID 2\n");
+
+	test_btf_map_in_map__destroy(skel);
+	skel = NULL;
+
+	/* we need to either wait for or force synchronize_rcu(), before
+	 * checking for "still exists" condition, otherwise map could still be
+	 * resolvable by ID, causing false positives.
+	 *
+	 * Older kernels (5.8 and earlier) freed map only after two
+	 * synchronize_rcu()s, so trigger two, to be entirely sure.
+	 */
+	CHECK(kern_sync_rcu(), "sync_rcu", "failed\n");
+	CHECK(kern_sync_rcu(), "sync_rcu", "failed\n");
+
+	fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map1_id);
+	if (CHECK(fd >= 0, "map1_leak", "inner_map1 leaked!\n")) {
+		close(fd);
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
+	fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map2_id);
+	if (CHECK(fd >= 0, "map2_leak", "inner_map2 leaked!\n")) {
+		close(fd);
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
+
 cleanup:
 	test_btf_map_in_map__destroy(skel);
 }