@@ -181,13 +181,20 @@ void nfc_hci_resp_received(struct nfc_hci_dev *hdev, u8 result,
void nfc_hci_cmd_received(struct nfc_hci_dev *hdev, u8 pipe, u8 cmd,
struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- u8 gate = hdev->pipes[pipe].gate;
u8 status = NFC_HCI_ANY_OK;
struct hci_create_pipe_resp *create_info;
struct hci_delete_pipe_noti *delete_info;
struct hci_all_pipe_cleared_noti *cleared_info;
+ u8 gate;
- pr_debug("from gate %x pipe %x cmd %x\n", gate, pipe, cmd);
+ pr_debug("from pipe %x cmd %x\n", pipe, cmd);
+
+ if (pipe >= NFC_HCI_MAX_PIPES) {
+ status = NFC_HCI_ANY_E_NOK;
+ goto exit;
+ }
+
+ gate = hdev->pipes[pipe].gate;
switch (cmd) {
case NFC_HCI_ADM_NOTIFY_PIPE_CREATED:
@@ -375,8 +382,14 @@ void nfc_hci_event_received(struct nfc_hci_dev *hdev, u8 pipe, u8 event,
struct sk_buff *skb)
{
int r = 0;
- u8 gate = hdev->pipes[pipe].gate;
+ u8 gate;
+
+ if (pipe >= NFC_HCI_MAX_PIPES) {
+ pr_err("Discarded event %x to invalid pipe %x\n", event, pipe);
+ goto exit;
+ }
+ gate = hdev->pipes[pipe].gate;
if (gate == NFC_HCI_INVALID_GATE) {
pr_err("Discarded event %x to unopened pipe %x\n", event, pipe);
goto exit;
This is similar to commit 674d9de02aa7 ("NFC: Fix possible memory corruption when handling SHDLC I-Frame commands") and commit d7ee81ad09f0 ("NFC: nci: Add some bounds checking in nci_hci_cmd_received()") which added range checks on "pipe". The "pipe" variable comes skb->data[0] in nfc_hci_msg_rx_work(). It's in the 0-255 range. We're using it as the array index into the hdev->pipes[] array which has NFC_HCI_MAX_PIPES (128) members. Fixes: 118278f20aa8 ("NFC: hci: Add pipes table to reference them with a tuple {gate, host}") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> --- net/nfc/hci/core.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)