diff mbox series

[bpf,3/3] bpf: show main program address in bpf_prog_info->jited_ksyms

Message ID 20181101070058.2760251-4-songliubraving@fb.com
State Changes Requested, archived
Delegated to: BPF Maintainers
Headers show
Series show more accurrate bpf program address | expand

Commit Message

Song Liu Nov. 1, 2018, 7 a.m. UTC
Currently, when there is not subprog (prog->aux->func_cnt == 0),
bpf_prog_info does not return any jited_ksyms. This patch adds
main program address (prog->bpf_func) to jited_ksyms.

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Daniel Borkmann Nov. 2, 2018, 9:57 a.m. UTC | #1
On 11/01/2018 08:00 AM, Song Liu wrote:
> Currently, when there is not subprog (prog->aux->func_cnt == 0),
> bpf_prog_info does not return any jited_ksyms. This patch adds
> main program address (prog->bpf_func) to jited_ksyms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index 34a9eef5992c..7293b17ca62a 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -2158,7 +2158,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  	}
>  
>  	ulen = info.nr_jited_ksyms;
> -	info.nr_jited_ksyms = prog->aux->func_cnt;
> +	info.nr_jited_ksyms = prog->aux->func_cnt ? : 1;
>  	if (info.nr_jited_ksyms && ulen) {
>  		if (bpf_dump_raw_ok()) {
>  			u64 __user *user_ksyms;
> @@ -2170,9 +2170,17 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  			 */
>  			ulen = min_t(u32, info.nr_jited_ksyms, ulen);
>  			user_ksyms = u64_to_user_ptr(info.jited_ksyms);
> -			for (i = 0; i < ulen; i++) {
> -				ksym_addr = (ulong) prog->aux->func[i]->bpf_func;
> -				if (put_user((u64) ksym_addr, &user_ksyms[i]))
> +			if (prog->aux->func_cnt) {
> +				for (i = 0; i < ulen; i++) {
> +					ksym_addr = (ulong)

Small nit: can we change ksym_addr, the above and below cast to kernel-style
'unsigned long' while at it?

> +						prog->aux->func[i]->bpf_func;
> +					if (put_user((u64) ksym_addr,
> +						     &user_ksyms[i]))
> +						return -EFAULT;
> +				}
> +			} else {
> +				ksym_addr = (ulong) prog->bpf_func;
> +				if (put_user((u64) ksym_addr, &user_ksyms[0]))
>  					return -EFAULT;

If we do this here, I think we should also update nr_jited_func_lens to copy
prog->jited_len to user space to be consistent with this change here. In case
of multi-func, the latter copies the len of the main program, and the lens of
the subprogs. Given we push the address for it to user space, we should then
also push the main prog len if it's only main prog there so this case doesn't
need any special handling by user space.

>  			}
>  		} else {
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 34a9eef5992c..7293b17ca62a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -2158,7 +2158,7 @@  static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	}
 
 	ulen = info.nr_jited_ksyms;
-	info.nr_jited_ksyms = prog->aux->func_cnt;
+	info.nr_jited_ksyms = prog->aux->func_cnt ? : 1;
 	if (info.nr_jited_ksyms && ulen) {
 		if (bpf_dump_raw_ok()) {
 			u64 __user *user_ksyms;
@@ -2170,9 +2170,17 @@  static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 			 */
 			ulen = min_t(u32, info.nr_jited_ksyms, ulen);
 			user_ksyms = u64_to_user_ptr(info.jited_ksyms);
-			for (i = 0; i < ulen; i++) {
-				ksym_addr = (ulong) prog->aux->func[i]->bpf_func;
-				if (put_user((u64) ksym_addr, &user_ksyms[i]))
+			if (prog->aux->func_cnt) {
+				for (i = 0; i < ulen; i++) {
+					ksym_addr = (ulong)
+						prog->aux->func[i]->bpf_func;
+					if (put_user((u64) ksym_addr,
+						     &user_ksyms[i]))
+						return -EFAULT;
+				}
+			} else {
+				ksym_addr = (ulong) prog->bpf_func;
+				if (put_user((u64) ksym_addr, &user_ksyms[0]))
 					return -EFAULT;
 			}
 		} else {