diff mbox series

[bpf,4/5] bpf, sockmap: fix map elem deletion race with smap_stop_sock

Message ID 20180816194910.9040-5-daniel@iogearbox.net
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: BPF Maintainers
Headers show
Series BPF sockmap and ulp fixes | expand

Commit Message

Daniel Borkmann Aug. 16, 2018, 7:49 p.m. UTC
The smap_start_sock() and smap_stop_sock() are each protected under
the sock->sk_callback_lock from their call-sites except in the case
of sock_map_delete_elem() where we drop the old socket from the map
slot. This is racy because the same sock could be part of multiple
sock maps, so we run smap_stop_sock() in parallel, and given at that
point psock->strp_enabled might be true on both CPUs, we might for
example wrongly restore the sk->sk_data_ready / sk->sk_write_space.
Therefore, hold the sock->sk_callback_lock as well on delete. Looks
like 2f857d04601a ("bpf: sockmap, remove STRPARSER map_flags and add
multi-map support") had this right, but later on e9db4ef6bf4c ("bpf:
sockhash fix omitted bucket lock in sock_close") removed it again
from delete leaving this smap_stop_sock() instance unprotected.

Fixes: e9db4ef6bf4c ("bpf: sockhash fix omitted bucket lock in sock_close")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/sockmap.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Song Liu Aug. 16, 2018, 9:30 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> The smap_start_sock() and smap_stop_sock() are each protected under
> the sock->sk_callback_lock from their call-sites except in the case
> of sock_map_delete_elem() where we drop the old socket from the map
> slot. This is racy because the same sock could be part of multiple
> sock maps, so we run smap_stop_sock() in parallel, and given at that
> point psock->strp_enabled might be true on both CPUs, we might for
> example wrongly restore the sk->sk_data_ready / sk->sk_write_space.
> Therefore, hold the sock->sk_callback_lock as well on delete. Looks
> like 2f857d04601a ("bpf: sockmap, remove STRPARSER map_flags and add
> multi-map support") had this right, but later on e9db4ef6bf4c ("bpf:
> sockhash fix omitted bucket lock in sock_close") removed it again
> from delete leaving this smap_stop_sock() instance unprotected.
>
> Fixes: e9db4ef6bf4c ("bpf: sockhash fix omitted bucket lock in sock_close")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>

> ---
>  kernel/bpf/sockmap.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
> index 94a324b..921cb6b 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
> @@ -1786,8 +1786,11 @@ static int sock_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
>         if (!psock)
>                 goto out;
>
> -       if (psock->bpf_parse)
> +       if (psock->bpf_parse) {
> +               write_lock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
>                 smap_stop_sock(psock, sock);
> +               write_unlock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
> +       }
>         smap_list_map_remove(psock, &stab->sock_map[k]);
>         smap_release_sock(psock, sock);
>  out:
> --
> 2.9.5
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
index 94a324b..921cb6b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
@@ -1786,8 +1786,11 @@  static int sock_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 	if (!psock)
 		goto out;
 
-	if (psock->bpf_parse)
+	if (psock->bpf_parse) {
+		write_lock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
 		smap_stop_sock(psock, sock);
+		write_unlock_bh(&sock->sk_callback_lock);
+	}
 	smap_list_map_remove(psock, &stab->sock_map[k]);
 	smap_release_sock(psock, sock);
 out: