hso: add Vendor/Product ID's for new devices

From: Jan Dumon <j.dumon@option.com>

Add Vendor/Product ID's for new devices.
Removed duplicate product ID 0x7361.

Signed-off-by: Jan Dumon <j.dumon@option.com>
---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Jan Dumon wrote:

> From: Jan Dumon <j.dumon@option.com>
> 
> Add Vendor/Product ID's for new devices.
> Removed duplicate product ID 0x7361.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Dumon <j.dumon@option.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/hso.c b/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
> index fe98aca..d47c508 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
> @@ -462,9 +462,16 @@ static const struct usb_device_id hso_ids[] = {
>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x7701)},
>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x7801)},
>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x7901)},
> -	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x7361)},
> -	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd057)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x8200)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x8201)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd035)},
>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd055)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd155)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd255)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd057)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd157)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd257)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd357)},
>  	{}
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(usb, hso_ids);

Is this list supposed to be kept in numerical order?  The entries for
0xd057 and 0xd157 are in the wrong place.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Jan Dumon wrote:
> 
>> From: Jan Dumon <j.dumon@option.com>
>>
>> Add Vendor/Product ID's for new devices.
>> Removed duplicate product ID 0x7361.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Dumon <j.dumon@option.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/hso.c b/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
>> index fe98aca..d47c508 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
>> @@ -462,9 +462,16 @@ static const struct usb_device_id hso_ids[] = {
>>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x7701)},
>>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x7801)},
>>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x7901)},
>> -	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x7361)},
>> -	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd057)},
>> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x8200)},
>> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x8201)},
>> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd035)},
>>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd055)},
>> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd155)},
>> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd255)},
>> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd057)},
>> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd157)},
>> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd257)},
>> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd357)},
>>  	{}
>>  };
>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(usb, hso_ids);
> 
> Is this list supposed to be kept in numerical order?  The entries for
> 0xd057 and 0xd157 are in the wrong place.

We have an internal document with all the product ID's we use and I've followed that order. That way
it's a lot easier for me to compare the two and spot the missing ID's every time the list gets updated.

The devices with ID's 0x[0-2]55 are all from the same 'family' as are those with ID's 0x[0-3]57.
That is why they are out of numerical order...

Greets,
Jan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

From: Jan Dumon <j.dumon@option.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:57:51 +0200

> Add Vendor/Product ID's for new devices.
> Removed duplicate product ID 0x7361.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Dumon <j.dumon@option.com>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html