Should we move IPVS out of net/ipv4 now?

From: "Julius Volz" <juliusv@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:47:13 +0200

> The build with ARCH=um seems to have a problem with the
> architecture-specific headers:
> 
> net/core/skb_dma_map.c: In function 'skb_dma_map':
> net/core/skb_dma_map.c:20: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'dma_mapping_error'
> 
> The bad commit that introduces the skb_dma_map.c file (and this error)
> is a40c24a1336. Previous versions build fine.

I'll commit the following to net-next-2.6, let me know if it doesn't
take care of the problem:

net: Fix build with ARCH=um

If UM is going to claim that it supports DMA by setting
HAS_DMA, it should provide a dma_mapping_error() implementation.

Based upon a report by Julius Volz.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:45 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: "Julius Volz" <juliusv@google.com>
> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:47:13 +0200
>
>> The build with ARCH=um seems to have a problem with the
>> architecture-specific headers:
>>
>> net/core/skb_dma_map.c: In function 'skb_dma_map':
>> net/core/skb_dma_map.c:20: error: implicit declaration of function
>> 'dma_mapping_error'
>>
>> The bad commit that introduces the skb_dma_map.c file (and this error)
>> is a40c24a1336. Previous versions build fine.
>
> I'll commit the following to net-next-2.6, let me know if it doesn't
> take care of the problem:
>
> net: Fix build with ARCH=um
>
> If UM is going to claim that it supports DMA by setting
> HAS_DMA, it should provide a dma_mapping_error() implementation.
>
> Based upon a report by Julius Volz.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> ---
>  include/asm-um/dma-mapping.h |    7 +++++++
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-um/dma-mapping.h b/include/asm-um/dma-mapping.h
> index f0ee4fb..90fc708 100644
> --- a/include/asm-um/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/asm-um/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -118,4 +118,11 @@ dma_cache_sync(struct device *dev, void *vaddr, size_t size,
>        BUG();
>  }
>
> +static inline int
> +dma_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_handle)
> +{
> +       BUG();
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  #endif
> --

Thanks, that got rid of the problem!

Julius