Message ID | 1604652452-11494-1-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Delegated to: | BPF Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | trace: Fix passing zero to 'PTR_ERR' warning | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
jkicinski/tree_selection | success | Not a local patch |
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 12:49 AM Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> wrote: > > Fix smatch warning. > > Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> > --- > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > index 4517c8b..2cb9c45 > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > @@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ static int bpf_btf_printf_prepare(struct btf_ptr *ptr, u32 btf_ptr_size, > *btf = bpf_get_btf_vmlinux(); > > if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(*btf)) > - return PTR_ERR(*btf); > + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(*btf); Either way returns zero for error? Which is the actual bug, so I think the proper fix is: return *btf ? PTR_ERR(*btf) : -EINVAL; Or something like that. > > if (ptr->type_id > 0) > *btf_id = ptr->type_id; > -- > 2.7.4 >
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 4517c8b..2cb9c45 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ static int bpf_btf_printf_prepare(struct btf_ptr *ptr, u32 btf_ptr_size, *btf = bpf_get_btf_vmlinux(); if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(*btf)) - return PTR_ERR(*btf); + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(*btf); if (ptr->type_id > 0) *btf_id = ptr->type_id;
Fix smatch warning. Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> --- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)