@@ -1986,9 +1986,9 @@ static inline u16 dev_cap_txqueue(struct net_device *dev, u16 queue_index)
{
if (unlikely(queue_index >= dev->real_num_tx_queues)) {
if (net_ratelimit()) {
- netdev_warn(dev, "selects TX queue %d, but "
- "real number of TX queues is %d\n",
- queue_index, dev->real_num_tx_queues);
+ pr_warning("%s selects TX queue %d, but "
+ "real number of TX queues is %d\n",
+ dev->name, queue_index, dev->real_num_tx_queues);
}
return 0;
}
@@ -2222,9 +2222,9 @@ static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
u16 index = skb_get_rx_queue(skb);
if (unlikely(index >= dev->num_rx_queues)) {
if (net_ratelimit()) {
- netdev_warn(dev, "received packet on queue "
- "%u, but number of RX queues is %u\n",
- index, dev->num_rx_queues);
+ pr_warning("%s received packet on queue "
+ "%u, but number of RX queues is %u\n",
+ dev->name, index, dev->num_rx_queues);
}
goto done;
}
Dont use netdev_warn() in dev_cap_txqueue() and get_rps_cpu() so that we can catch following warnings without crash. bond0.2240 received packet on queue 6, but number of RX queues is 1 bond0.2240 received packet on queue 11, but number of RX queues is 1 Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> --- Or maybe netdev_warn() implementation should be changed ? net/core/dev.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html