Message ID | 20200527234113.2491988-1-olteanv@gmail.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | New DSA driver for VSC9953 Seville switch | expand |
On Thu, 28 May 2020 02:41:02 +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > Looking at the Felix and Ocelot drivers, Maxim asked if it would be > possible to use them as a base for a new driver for the switch inside > NXP T1040. Turns out, it is! The result is a driver eerily similar to > Felix. > > The biggest challenge seems to be getting register read/write API > generic enough to cover such wild bitfield variations between hardware > generations. There is a patch on the regmap core which I would like to > get in through the networking subsystem, if possible (and if Mark is > ok), since it's a trivial addition. > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] regmap: add helper for per-port regfield initialization commit: 8baebfc2aca26e3fa67ab28343671b82be42b22c All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 05:51:52PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > [1/1] regmap: add helper for per-port regfield initialization > commit: 8baebfc2aca26e3fa67ab28343671b82be42b22c Let me know if you need a pull request for this, I figured it was too late to deal with the cross tree issues for the merge window.
Hi Mark, On Fri, 29 May 2020 at 19:59, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 05:51:52PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > [1/1] regmap: add helper for per-port regfield initialization > > commit: 8baebfc2aca26e3fa67ab28343671b82be42b22c > > Let me know if you need a pull request for this, I figured it was too > late to deal with the cross tree issues for the merge window. Thanks a lot for merging this. I plan to resend this series again (on the last mile!) during the weekend, with the feedback collected so far, so I'm not sure what is the best path to make sure Dave also has this patch in his tree so I don't break net-next. -Vladimir
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 08:28:01PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > Thanks a lot for merging this. I plan to resend this series again (on > the last mile!) during the weekend, with the feedback collected so > far, so I'm not sure what is the best path to make sure Dave also has > this patch in his tree so I don't break net-next. That was what the pull request would be for, though if you need to resend the chances are it'll be after the merge window before it gets applied in which case he'll get the patch through Linus' tree which makes things easier (that was part of the reason I just went ahead and applied).
On Fri, 29 May 2020 at 20:34, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 08:28:01PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > > Thanks a lot for merging this. I plan to resend this series again (on > > the last mile!) during the weekend, with the feedback collected so > > far, so I'm not sure what is the best path to make sure Dave also has > > this patch in his tree so I don't break net-next. > > That was what the pull request would be for, though if you need to > resend the chances are it'll be after the merge window before it gets > applied in which case he'll get the patch through Linus' tree which > makes things easier (that was part of the reason I just went ahead and > applied). Yeah, well, I was hoping I could get this in for 5.8, since the changes requested so far aren't radical (and neither are the patches themselves). If it's too much of a hassle I can wait for the merge window to close, sure. Thanks, -Vladimir