mbox series

[0/2] add Ethernet driver support for mt2712

Message ID 1537165763-13112-1-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com
Headers show
Series add Ethernet driver support for mt2712 | expand

Message

Biao Huang (黄彪) Sept. 17, 2018, 6:29 a.m. UTC
Ethernet in mt2712 is totally different from that in
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/*, so we add new folder for mt2712 SoC.

The mt2712 Ethernet IP is from Synopsys, and we notice that there is a
reference driver in drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/*. But
1. our version is only for 10/100/1000Mbps, not for 2.5/4/5Gbps.
mt2712 Ethernet design is differnet from that in synopsys folder in many
aspects, and some key features are not included in mt2712, such as rss
and split header. At the same time, some features we need have not been
implenmented in synopsys folder.
2. MediaTek will lauch new products base on this version continously, and
there will be modifications between these products.

so, we'd better maintain MediaTek's Ethernet driver to support synopsys-ip
based products. And we adopt the frameworks in synopsys/* to develop
Ethernet driver in mt2712.

Comments

Andrew Lunn Sept. 17, 2018, 3:24 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 02:29:21PM +0800, Biao Huang wrote:

Adding in the STMMAC driver maintainers.

> Ethernet in mt2712 is totally different from that in
> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/*, so we add new folder for mt2712 SoC.
> 
> The mt2712 Ethernet IP is from Synopsys, and we notice that there is a
> reference driver in drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/*. But
> 1. our version is only for 10/100/1000Mbps, not for 2.5/4/5Gbps.
> mt2712 Ethernet design is differnet from that in synopsys folder in many
> aspects, and some key features are not included in mt2712, such as rss
> and split header. At the same time, some features we need have not been
> implenmented in synopsys folder.

In general, we don't have two very similar drivers. We try to have one
driver. If the problem was just missing features in the stmmac driver,
you can add them. I doubt not supporting 2.5/4/5Gbps in your silicon
is an issue, since very few STMMAC devices have this. By split header,
do you mean support for TSO? That seems to be a gmac4 or newer
feature, but the driver supports not having tso support in hardware.

Giuseppe, Alexandre, Jose: Please can you look at the proposed driver
and see how much it really differs from the STMMAC driver. How easy
would it be to extend stmmac it to support the mt2712?

Thanks
	Andrew
Jose Abreu Sept. 17, 2018, 4:18 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Andrew, Biao,

On 17-09-2018 16:24, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 02:29:21PM +0800, Biao Huang wrote:
>
> Adding in the STMMAC driver maintainers.
>
>> Ethernet in mt2712 is totally different from that in
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/*, so we add new folder for mt2712 SoC.
>>
>> The mt2712 Ethernet IP is from Synopsys, and we notice that there is a
>> reference driver in drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/*. But
>> 1. our version is only for 10/100/1000Mbps, not for 2.5/4/5Gbps.
>> mt2712 Ethernet design is differnet from that in synopsys folder in many
>> aspects, and some key features are not included in mt2712, such as rss
>> and split header. At the same time, some features we need have not been
>> implenmented in synopsys folder.
> In general, we don't have two very similar drivers. We try to have one
> driver. If the problem was just missing features in the stmmac driver,
> you can add them. I doubt not supporting 2.5/4/5Gbps in your silicon
> is an issue, since very few STMMAC devices have this. By split header,
> do you mean support for TSO? That seems to be a gmac4 or newer
> feature, but the driver supports not having tso support in hardware.
>
> Giuseppe, Alexandre, Jose: Please can you look at the proposed driver
> and see how much it really differs from the STMMAC driver. 

Thanks for the cc Andrew, indeed this looks very similar and the
register bank matches, by what I've seen, GMAC 4+.

> How easy
> would it be to extend stmmac it to support the mt2712?

Very easy, as I've just done with XGMAC2. If Biao wants to expand
stmmac functionality I'm all in favor!

Thanks and Best Regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu

>
> Thanks
> 	Andrew
Biao Huang (黄彪) Sept. 18, 2018, 3:24 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Jose, Andrew,
	Thanks for your comments.
	Synopsys ip version in mt2712 is 4.21a, and followed ic will use 5.10a.
it seems GMAC4+ is a good choice. I'll try to  extend STMMAC to support
mt2712.
	Any tips about extend STMMAC? or anythings I should pay attention to?
	
On Mon, 2018-09-17 at 17:18 +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi Andrew, Biao,
> 
> On 17-09-2018 16:24, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 02:29:21PM +0800, Biao Huang wrote:
> >
> > Adding in the STMMAC driver maintainers.
> >
> >> Ethernet in mt2712 is totally different from that in
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/*, so we add new folder for mt2712 SoC.
> >>
> >> The mt2712 Ethernet IP is from Synopsys, and we notice that there is a
> >> reference driver in drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/*. But
> >> 1. our version is only for 10/100/1000Mbps, not for 2.5/4/5Gbps.
> >> mt2712 Ethernet design is differnet from that in synopsys folder in many
> >> aspects, and some key features are not included in mt2712, such as rss
> >> and split header. At the same time, some features we need have not been
> >> implenmented in synopsys folder.
> > In general, we don't have two very similar drivers. We try to have one
> > driver. If the problem was just missing features in the stmmac driver,
> > you can add them. I doubt not supporting 2.5/4/5Gbps in your silicon
> > is an issue, since very few STMMAC devices have this. By split header,
> > do you mean support for TSO? That seems to be a gmac4 or newer
> > feature, but the driver supports not having tso support in hardware.
> >
> > Giuseppe, Alexandre, Jose: Please can you look at the proposed driver
> > and see how much it really differs from the STMMAC driver. 
> 
> Thanks for the cc Andrew, indeed this looks very similar and the
> register bank matches, by what I've seen, GMAC 4+.
> 
> > How easy
> > would it be to extend stmmac it to support the mt2712?
> 
> Very easy, as I've just done with XGMAC2. If Biao wants to expand
> stmmac functionality I'm all in favor!
> 
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> Jose Miguel Abreu
> 
> >
> > Thanks
> > 	Andrew
> 
Best Regards!
Biao
Jose Abreu Sept. 18, 2018, 3:47 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Biao,

On 18-09-2018 04:24, biao huang wrote:
> Hi Jose, Andrew,
> 	Thanks for your comments.
> 	Synopsys ip version in mt2712 is 4.21a, and followed ic will use 5.10a.
> it seems GMAC4+ is a good choice. I'll try to  extend STMMAC to support
> mt2712.
> 	Any tips about extend STMMAC? or anythings I should pay attention to?

STMMAC already supports 4.21a and 5.10a. You only have to make
sure that your regbank and descriptors matches.

Thanks and Best Regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu

> 	
> On Mon, 2018-09-17 at 17:18 +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi Andrew, Biao,
>>
>> On 17-09-2018 16:24, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 02:29:21PM +0800, Biao Huang wrote:
>>>
>>> Adding in the STMMAC driver maintainers.
>>>
>>>> Ethernet in mt2712 is totally different from that in
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/*, so we add new folder for mt2712 SoC.
>>>>
>>>> The mt2712 Ethernet IP is from Synopsys, and we notice that there is a
>>>> reference driver in drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/*. But
>>>> 1. our version is only for 10/100/1000Mbps, not for 2.5/4/5Gbps.
>>>> mt2712 Ethernet design is differnet from that in synopsys folder in many
>>>> aspects, and some key features are not included in mt2712, such as rss
>>>> and split header. At the same time, some features we need have not been
>>>> implenmented in synopsys folder.
>>> In general, we don't have two very similar drivers. We try to have one
>>> driver. If the problem was just missing features in the stmmac driver,
>>> you can add them. I doubt not supporting 2.5/4/5Gbps in your silicon
>>> is an issue, since very few STMMAC devices have this. By split header,
>>> do you mean support for TSO? That seems to be a gmac4 or newer
>>> feature, but the driver supports not having tso support in hardware.
>>>
>>> Giuseppe, Alexandre, Jose: Please can you look at the proposed driver
>>> and see how much it really differs from the STMMAC driver. 
>> Thanks for the cc Andrew, indeed this looks very similar and the
>> register bank matches, by what I've seen, GMAC 4+.
>>
>>> How easy
>>> would it be to extend stmmac it to support the mt2712?
>> Very easy, as I've just done with XGMAC2. If Biao wants to expand
>> stmmac functionality I'm all in favor!
>>
>> Thanks and Best Regards,
>> Jose Miguel Abreu
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> 	Andrew
> Best Regards!
> Biao
>