Message ID | f224defc029816a74c518c54af2fbf2b90a90da6.1619176445.git.jstancek@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | mkfs: relax size check | expand |
Hi Jan,
Yes, I also noticed mkfs01_ext3_sh and mkfs01_ext4_sh on mainline, this could
help. Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Kind regards,
Petr
Hi Jan, > Yes, I also noticed mkfs01_ext3_sh and mkfs01_ext4_sh on mainline, this could > help. Thanks! Yes, it fixes the problem otherwise reproducible on openSUSE, which uses e2fsprogs 1.46.2 with commit 59037c53. Kind regards, Petr
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:16 PM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote: > > Number of total data blocks in filesystem reported by statfs > may be less than current formula of 90%. For example ext4 will > subtract "s_first_data_block plus internal journal blocks". > > With recent change to e2fsprogs, overhead calculated in user-space > increased slightly and LTP test started failing: > https://github.com/tytso/e2fsprogs/commit/59037c5357d39c6d0f14a0aff70e67dc13eafc84 > > Since there's no strict rule how much the overhead will be, > as rule of thumb relax the condition to 80%. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Hi Jan, Li, > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:16 PM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote: > > Number of total data blocks in filesystem reported by statfs > > may be less than current formula of 90%. For example ext4 will > > subtract "s_first_data_block plus internal journal blocks". > > With recent change to e2fsprogs, overhead calculated in user-space > > increased slightly and LTP test started failing: > > https://github.com/tytso/e2fsprogs/commit/59037c5357d39c6d0f14a0aff70e67dc13eafc84 > > Since there's no strict rule how much the overhead will be, > > as rule of thumb relax the condition to 80%. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com> I dared to merge your fix. Thanks! Kind regards, Petr
diff --git a/testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh b/testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh index 13491c9685ae..3e3e56719cf3 100755 --- a/testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh +++ b/testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh @@ -69,11 +69,11 @@ mkfs_verify_size() # 1k-block size should be devided by this argument for ntfs verification. if [ "$1" = "ntfs" ]; then local rate=1024/512 - if [ $blocknum -lt "$(($2/$rate*9/10))" ]; then + if [ $blocknum -lt "$(($2/$rate*8/10))" ]; then return 1 fi else - if [ $blocknum -lt "$(($2*9/10))" ]; then + if [ $blocknum -lt "$(($2*8/10))" ]; then return 1 fi fi
Number of total data blocks in filesystem reported by statfs may be less than current formula of 90%. For example ext4 will subtract "s_first_data_block plus internal journal blocks". With recent change to e2fsprogs, overhead calculated in user-space increased slightly and LTP test started failing: https://github.com/tytso/e2fsprogs/commit/59037c5357d39c6d0f14a0aff70e67dc13eafc84 Since there's no strict rule how much the overhead will be, as rule of thumb relax the condition to 80%. Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> --- I haven't found better way to set the test expectation, so to address immediate failures I propose to relax the check. testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)