From patchwork Tue Apr 20 07:53:51 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Li Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 1468224 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux.it (client-ip=213.254.12.146; helo=picard.linux.it; envelope-from=ltp-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.linux.it; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=P6hdForx; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FPbYT288dz9t0T for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:54:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACA63C6C88 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:54:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: ltp@lists.linux.it Delivered-To: ltp@picard.linux.it Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6B743C6C67 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:54:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB9D4600748 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:54:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1618905253; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ghn0QETr5XBtaP4oGwEJ476ul/tbCwyAVP9qg5scM0Y=; b=P6hdForx+uD/KX68JAesH8f3U7tAJZc0k4aw7+XcWfPem1ZFLmvS14v+1tw8AmD2WZmigd Sd7wyPP61jIuwCh5lrgUdxBiry5PHHXYK9UQBeUJdIbnObOvJqNj31hN0eADdxbqoTqQn6 SYgIqncgoMfzigA8dtfITwbVvdXgjTc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-141-X5piuipYPvieycRsWMHi-A-1; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 03:53:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: X5piuipYPvieycRsWMHi-A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56985107ACCD; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from liwang-workstation.nay.redhat.com (dhcp-66-81-187.nay.redhat.com [10.66.81.187]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADB619172; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 07:53:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Li Wang To: xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com, ltp@lists.linux.it Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:53:51 +0800 Message-Id: <20210420075351.16059-1-liwang@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=liwang@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=7.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on in-5.smtp.seeweb.it Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] mkfs: print more info for debugging X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ltp-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" We can NOT reproduce the problem by manual with both ppc64le and s390x, so let's print more useful info from test when getting fail. mkfs01 1 TPASS: 'mkfs -t ext4 /dev/loop0 ' passed. mkfs01 2 TFAIL: 'mkfs -t ext4 /dev/loop0 16000' failed, not expected. mkfs01 3 TPASS: 'mkfs -t ext4 -c /dev/loop0 ' passed. mkfs01 4 TPASS: 'mkfs -V ' passed. mkfs01 5 TPASS: 'mkfs -h ' passed. Signed-off-by: Li Wang Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel --- testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh b/testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh index 90368190d..55296c8df 100755 --- a/testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh +++ b/testcases/commands/mkfs/mkfs01.sh @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ mkfs_test() if [ -n "$device" ]; then mkfs_verify_type "$fs_type" "$device" if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then - tst_res TFAIL "'${mkfs_cmd}' failed, not expected." + tst_res TFAIL "'${mkfs_cmd}' failed, not expected type." + cat temp return fi fi @@ -136,7 +137,8 @@ mkfs_test() if [ -n "$size" ]; then mkfs_verify_size "$fs_type" "$size" if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then - tst_res TFAIL "'${mkfs_cmd}' failed, not expected." + tst_res TFAIL "'${mkfs_cmd}' failed, not expected size." + cat temp return fi fi