diff mbox series

[v2,2/2] syscalls/geteuid02: Convert into new api

Message ID 1688637954-17765-2-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
State Accepted
Headers show
Series [v2,1/2] syscalls/geteuid01: Convert into new api | expand

Commit Message

Yang Xu \(Fujitsu\) July 6, 2023, 10:05 a.m. UTC
Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
---
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/geteuid/geteuid02.c | 89 +++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)

Comments

Petr Vorel July 7, 2023, 9:01 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Xu,

> -		if (pwent == NULL)
> -			tst_resm(TFAIL | TERRNO, "getpwuid failed");
> -
> -		UID16_CHECK(pwent->pw_uid, geteuid, cleanup);
Don't we need to use UID16_CHECK()? In the new API version from
compat_tst_16.h

Kind regards,
Petr

> -		if (pwent->pw_uid != TEST_RETURN)
> -			tst_resm(TFAIL, "getpwuid value, %d, "
> -				 "does not match geteuid "
> -				 "value, %ld", pwent->pw_uid,
> -				 TEST_RETURN);
> -		else
> -			tst_resm(TPASS, "values from geteuid "
> -				 "and getpwuid match");
> -	}
...
> +	TST_EXP_EXPR(TST_RET == uid[1],
> +		     "geteuid() ret %ld == /proc/self/status EUID: %ld",
> +		     TST_RET, uid[1]);
>  }

> +static struct tst_test test = {
> +	.test_all = verify_geteuid,
> +};
Yang Xu \(Fujitsu\) July 12, 2023, 2:01 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Petr,

> Hi Xu,
> 
>> -		if (pwent == NULL)
>> -			tst_resm(TFAIL | TERRNO, "getpwuid failed");
>> -
>> -		UID16_CHECK(pwent->pw_uid, geteuid, cleanup);
> Don't we need to use UID16_CHECK()? In the new API version from
> compat_tst_16.h
> 
 >
Previously, the EUID was obtained from the return value of getpwuid()
and compared with the return value of geteuid() to check for a match.
This approach seemed more like a test of getpwuid() rather than testing 
geteuid() itself.

EUID is stored in /proc/self/status, and we can directly obtain it for 
comparison with the return from geteuid().

Best Regards
Yang Xu

> Kind regards,
> Petr
> 
>> -		if (pwent->pw_uid != TEST_RETURN)
>> -			tst_resm(TFAIL, "getpwuid value, %d, "
>> -				 "does not match geteuid "
>> -				 "value, %ld", pwent->pw_uid,
>> -				 TEST_RETURN);
>> -		else
>> -			tst_resm(TPASS, "values from geteuid "
>> -				 "and getpwuid match");
>> -	}
> ...
>> +	TST_EXP_EXPR(TST_RET == uid[1],
>> +		     "geteuid() ret %ld == /proc/self/status EUID: %ld",
>> +		     TST_RET, uid[1]);
>>   }
> 
>> +static struct tst_test test = {
>> +	.test_all = verify_geteuid,
>> +};
Yang Xu \(Fujitsu\) July 17, 2023, 10:42 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Petr,

Kindly ping,

This case references getuid03,
the URL for providing modification suggestions is as follows:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20211109085745.21531-2-tangmeng@uniontech.com/

Best Regards
Yang Xu

> Hi Petr,
> 
>> Hi Xu,
>>
>>> -		if (pwent == NULL)
>>> -			tst_resm(TFAIL | TERRNO, "getpwuid failed");
>>> -
>>> -		UID16_CHECK(pwent->pw_uid, geteuid, cleanup);
>> Don't we need to use UID16_CHECK()? In the new API version from
>> compat_tst_16.h
>>
>   >
> Previously, the EUID was obtained from the return value of getpwuid()
> and compared with the return value of geteuid() to check for a match.
> This approach seemed more like a test of getpwuid() rather than testing
> geteuid() itself.
> 
> EUID is stored in /proc/self/status, and we can directly obtain it for
> comparison with the return from geteuid().
> 
> Best Regards
> Yang Xu
> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Petr
>>
>>> -		if (pwent->pw_uid != TEST_RETURN)
>>> -			tst_resm(TFAIL, "getpwuid value, %d, "
>>> -				 "does not match geteuid "
>>> -				 "value, %ld", pwent->pw_uid,
>>> -				 TEST_RETURN);
>>> -		else
>>> -			tst_resm(TPASS, "values from geteuid "
>>> -				 "and getpwuid match");
>>> -	}
>> ...
>>> +	TST_EXP_EXPR(TST_RET == uid[1],
>>> +		     "geteuid() ret %ld == /proc/self/status EUID: %ld",
>>> +		     TST_RET, uid[1]);
>>>    }
>>
>>> +static struct tst_test test = {
>>> +	.test_all = verify_geteuid,
>>> +};
>
Petr Vorel July 17, 2023, 1:11 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Xu,

> Hi Petr,

> Kindly ping,

I'm sorry, I thought I replied, but obviously I forget.
Go ahead and merge, please.

Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>

> This case references getuid03,
> the URL for providing modification suggestions is as follows:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20211109085745.21531-2-tangmeng@uniontech.com/

Thanks for this info.

Kind regards,
Petr
...
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/geteuid/geteuid02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/geteuid/geteuid02.c
index e00f812..00b42c3 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/geteuid/geteuid02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/geteuid/geteuid02.c
@@ -1,79 +1,36 @@ 
+//SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
 /*
  * Copyright (c) International Business Machines  Corp., 2001
- *  Ported by Wayne Boyer
- *
- * This program is free software;  you can redistribute it and/or modify
- * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
- * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
- * (at your option) any later version.
- *
- * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
- * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY;  without even the implied warranty of
- * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See
- * the GNU General Public License for more details.
- *
- * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- * along with this program;  if not, write to the Free Software
- * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
+ * Copyright (c) Linux Test Project, 2003-2023
+ * AUTHOR: Wayne Boyer
  */
 
-#include <pwd.h>
-#include <errno.h>
-
-#include "test.h"
-#include "compat_16.h"
-
-TCID_DEFINE(geteuid02);
-int TST_TOTAL = 1;
+/*\
+ *[Description]
+ *
+ * Check that geteuid() return value matches value from /proc/self/status.
+ */
 
-static void setup(void);
-static void cleanup(void);
+#include "tst_test.h"
+#include "compat_tst_16.h"
 
-int main(int ac, char **av)
+static void verify_geteuid(void)
 {
-	struct passwd *pwent;
-	int lc;
-	uid_t uid;
-
-	tst_parse_opts(ac, av, NULL, NULL);
-
-	setup();
+	long uid[4];
 
-	for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
-		tst_count = 0;
+	TST_EXP_POSITIVE(GETEUID(), "geteuid()");
 
-		TEST(GETEUID(cleanup));
+	if (!TST_PASS)
+		return;
 
-		if (TEST_RETURN == -1)
-			tst_brkm(TBROK | TTERRNO, cleanup, "geteuid* failed");
+	SAFE_FILE_LINES_SCANF("/proc/self/status", "Uid: %ld %ld %ld %ld",
+			      &uid[0], &uid[1], &uid[2], &uid[3]);
 
-		uid = geteuid();
-		pwent = getpwuid(uid);
-
-		if (pwent == NULL)
-			tst_resm(TFAIL | TERRNO, "getpwuid failed");
-
-		UID16_CHECK(pwent->pw_uid, geteuid, cleanup);
-		if (pwent->pw_uid != TEST_RETURN)
-			tst_resm(TFAIL, "getpwuid value, %d, "
-				 "does not match geteuid "
-				 "value, %ld", pwent->pw_uid,
-				 TEST_RETURN);
-		else
-			tst_resm(TPASS, "values from geteuid "
-				 "and getpwuid match");
-	}
-
-	cleanup();
-	tst_exit();
-}
-
-static void setup(void)
-{
-	tst_sig(NOFORK, DEF_HANDLER, cleanup);
-	TEST_PAUSE;
+	TST_EXP_EXPR(TST_RET == uid[1],
+		     "geteuid() ret %ld == /proc/self/status EUID: %ld",
+		     TST_RET, uid[1]);
 }
 
-static void cleanup(void)
-{
-}
+static struct tst_test test = {
+	.test_all = verify_geteuid,
+};