From patchwork Mon Sep 26 18:26:21 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Edward Liaw X-Patchwork-Id: 1682796 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux.it (client-ip=2001:1418:10:5::2; helo=picard.linux.it; envelope-from=ltp-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.linux.it; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=FdUlMoev; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [IPv6:2001:1418:10:5::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MbrnL6X0Nz1yqM for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 04:26:46 +1000 (AEST) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F9C3CADEE for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 20:26:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: ltp@lists.linux.it Delivered-To: ltp@picard.linux.it Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E73E3C278D for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 20:26:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-x104a.google.com (mail-pj1-x104a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::104a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F18F1A00719 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 20:26:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-x104a.google.com with SMTP id pf10-20020a17090b1d8a00b002037c2aad2bso8164762pjb.0 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:26:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:from:to:cc:subject :date; bh=l6YHfZ9MHuX9l3R3Aoh93GAYWPlXZX1VXnRAwoArBwU=; b=FdUlMoev0jvr19bw3goCOg2crklts9nYbJe49SUv9dqhpVIiIdEYM/gBZWqYl84O99 0+60XX959uzTQ8rDtSVEQX3P+LRPAlR9FpjoFsLSbWvxGRHEDbTwuzyGkkltxiojYV80 LWj94OIbnsyLHV2XgrN5FssEzy2qi3NlwCfj6f4rtpGpffpxbdJD7lroUcUeS7PfE6qA TqROGr+pEL11TofZ2F2zp9NlgD+SVMtYuvFZwWJKeqKk1nHiE5GTBQ4FkQjQgfIQx3DR TglnuFp95UupBVn/fDQ94FajOpn4YpsnzjzT1SBgx+oGf0BF8GYEplGPu30SU2+VSBgX /vTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=l6YHfZ9MHuX9l3R3Aoh93GAYWPlXZX1VXnRAwoArBwU=; b=iR7SqNg02RJ8b+Kcwi2xu0amveZgGuyg5Y2GOMQHMcVs6jlRUv/IvUr3KhssmBW+tR DdEH4T3lvvGQpTPS1ySh8qm1r8u2pcjqi/bYQfxBviiuBW+K55twWn48vcRXXf64K0Gy cvZGt/HIpp09f6FCmLSG0Fbw+66kTXXNdtHp4PzLxeVHdDGiOwOugZrzxKECfII+QARs Rw6J27Gj8ypXp08X0vPIYWyt8MDMLdGcDdtPhiZTDqK9wDqTI68cQorDGTM1wFS9eGr3 ZPdvbx0wd94tAk0Z73TJN/UMpvOeWMCjIbtKXsyLv8mUVRG0fP4v7wKklQx7m2OZ7/Kn kttQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2Er9VqbDwCHN2U6vuWdmYhBQh+OdOyECjvuUkLSDeChPqhAGYM DNmwevwxz4YPTkaPfQZ7Qp+5KOlfskFN/jZraJEr0npPdfJzCAMneKfrU6IaOPQ3lVSdlvgKKAr z4L4s9Wytpsnqz7vla4/mpequOy1XGA4UZn6+nWp+g7OPiyRE8E5ycqJU X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7HBDNZfAo4Na1x/Rpp7qZh3ZmBYfsde547i2FcpaHH+EtT3NnlB3mc85puI01wscA1lI8zX2Es9ns= X-Received: from edliaw.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:24:72f4:c0a8:305d]) (user=edliaw job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:902:ab5c:b0:178:37f7:6a55 with SMTP id ij28-20020a170902ab5c00b0017837f76a55mr22774572plb.45.1664216798059; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:26:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 18:26:21 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.3.998.g577e59143f-goog Message-ID: <20220926182625.103275-1-edliaw@google.com> To: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 required=7.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on in-3.smtp.seeweb.it Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v1 0/4] mmapstress01: refactor to ltp framework X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Patchwork-Original-From: Edward Liaw via ltp From: Edward Liaw Reply-To: Edward Liaw Cc: kernel-team@android.com Errors-To: ltp-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Attempt to refactor mmapstress01 to use the ltp framework. It was using LARGE_FILE to switch between 32 and 64 bit sized off_t. Is it correct to use FILE_OFFSET_BITS instead? Edward Liaw (4): mmapstress01: refactor to tst_test framework mmapstress01: refactor options mmapstress01: use FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 mmapstress01: use safe macros testcases/kernel/mem/mmapstress/Makefile | 2 + .../kernel/mem/mmapstress/mmapstress01.c | 624 ++++++------------ 2 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 414 deletions(-)