From patchwork Thu Jan 6 11:45:09 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1576059 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=AMntmjhh; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JV4Qv0LMQz9sSs for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 22:49:59 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4JV4Qt63jlz3cZg for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 22:49:58 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=AMntmjhh; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=AMntmjhh; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JV4Ly6Ysdz30gk for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 22:46:34 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 2069HpYi025311; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:46:17 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=GPXS1Dimz8xAOOpH+0lqqD8YZlQFkbcXwd7KT60w3PI=; b=AMntmjhh2CpGmb1g2wPPB+Mxqy3OaTYSkvmeE2iEKpY7U3kfGH3olnAW5xEZS6JvvBSK jA02LQE5lP0wZpk/p+MtFkIqr72pQTjxwQPLMmfOc2neHGVm+Dl1YdZ+VXfbE+Ah4+cv s0n2XUs1LRTDpikJGsQlxLbYMLhMZfp5LUCgqa41KEe4Faq7TkGWTVkautY+rdlP+ORA gzpFD4wyPmul/kqfB+yMZ4sgk6fY2TMyaIImw4esTJhwUTIP6aJeuuozFJFfjzSTis5H jJqKiv1e5r2Tb6zNvLRf2IT3AhthuLC2pPvubBzPKYQgRt71pCtCO5euzXF6ulnLiaoN nw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3ddwnvteng-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Jan 2022 11:46:16 +0000 Received: from m0098420.ppops.net (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 206Bceqe030774; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:46:16 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3ddwnvtemv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Jan 2022 11:46:16 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 206BhoUH024823; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:46:14 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3ddmsvmrhh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Jan 2022 11:46:14 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 206BkBgp43647232 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:46:11 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E13A4054; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:46:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4303A4062; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:46:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from naverao1-tp.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.91.118]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:46:07 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov Subject: [PATCH 05/13] powerpc/bpf: Skip branch range validation during first pass Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 17:15:09 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: rzHjESrtERy_jaIcq_uXEf5IeWCOORTO X-Proofpoint-GUID: 0t3rusSu8XbVZMXp0UxYvET6iEaMN7kg X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-01-06_04,2022-01-06_01,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2112160000 definitions=main-2201060081 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ykaliuta@redhat.com, johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, song@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" During the first pass, addrs[] is still being populated. So, all branches to following instructions will appear to be going to the start of the JIT program. Ignore branch range validation for such instructions and assume those to be in range. Branch range validation will happen during the second pass after addrs[] is setup properly. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h index b20a2a83a6e75b..9cdd33d6be4cc0 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ #define PPC_JMP(dest) \ do { \ long offset = (long)(dest) - (ctx->idx * 4); \ - if (!is_offset_in_branch_range(offset)) { \ + if ((dest) != 0 && !is_offset_in_branch_range(offset)) { \ pr_err_ratelimited("Branch offset 0x%lx (@%u) out of range\n", offset, ctx->idx); \ return -ERANGE; \ } \ @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ #define PPC_BCC_SHORT(cond, dest) \ do { \ long offset = (long)(dest) - (ctx->idx * 4); \ - if (!is_offset_in_cond_branch_range(offset)) { \ + if ((dest) != 0 && !is_offset_in_cond_branch_range(offset)) { \ pr_err_ratelimited("Conditional branch offset 0x%lx (@%u) out of range\n", offset, ctx->idx); \ return -ERANGE; \ } \