diff mbox series

[RFC] powerpc: switch two fixed phy links to full duplex

Message ID 64533952-1299-4ae2-860d-b34b97a24d98@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [RFC] powerpc: switch two fixed phy links to full duplex | expand

Commit Message

Heiner Kallweit Dec. 5, 2025, 5:21 p.m. UTC
These two fixed links are the only ones in-kernel specifying half duplex.
If these could be switched to full duplex, then half duplex handling
could be removed from phylib fixed phy, phylink, swphy.

The SoC MAC's are capable of full duplex, fs_enet MAC driver is as well.
Anything that would keep us from switching to full duplex?

Whilst at it, replace the deprecated old fixed-link binding.

Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mgcoge.dts | 6 +++++-
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/tqm8xx.dts | 6 +++++-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrew Lunn Dec. 5, 2025, 5:50 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 06:21:50PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> These two fixed links are the only ones in-kernel specifying half duplex.
> If these could be switched to full duplex, then half duplex handling
> could be removed from phylib fixed phy, phylink, swphy.
> 
> The SoC MAC's are capable of full duplex, fs_enet MAC driver is as well.
> Anything that would keep us from switching to full duplex?

What do we know about the device on the other end of the link? Maybe
that is what is limiting it to 10Half?

	Andrew
Heiner Kallweit Dec. 5, 2025, 9:16 p.m. UTC | #2
On 12/5/2025 6:50 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 06:21:50PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> These two fixed links are the only ones in-kernel specifying half duplex.
>> If these could be switched to full duplex, then half duplex handling
>> could be removed from phylib fixed phy, phylink, swphy.
>>
>> The SoC MAC's are capable of full duplex, fs_enet MAC driver is as well.
>> Anything that would keep us from switching to full duplex?
> 
> What do we know about the device on the other end of the link? Maybe
> that is what is limiting it to 10Half?
> 
I found no hint that anything is connected to this ethernet port on
the two boards. Hard to find any information because the boards are
>15yrs old. Seems this are dummy entries, just to let fs_enet load.

> 	Andrew

Heiner
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mgcoge.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mgcoge.dts
index 9cefed20723..cea9bdc65dc 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mgcoge.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mgcoge.dts
@@ -153,7 +153,11 @@  eth0: ethernet@11a60 {
 				interrupt-parent = <&PIC>;
 				linux,network-index = <0>;
 				fsl,cpm-command = <0xce00000>;
-				fixed-link = <0 0 10 0 0>;
+
+				fixed-link {
+					speed = <10>;
+					full-duplex;
+				};
 			};
 
 			i2c@11860 {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/tqm8xx.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/tqm8xx.dts
index d16cdfd8120..e582487d5a3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/tqm8xx.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/tqm8xx.dts
@@ -185,7 +185,11 @@  eth0: ethernet@a00 {
 				interrupt-parent = <&CPM_PIC>;
 				fsl,cpm-command = <0000>;
 				linux,network-index = <0>;
-				fixed-link = <0 0 10 0 0>;
+
+				fixed-link {
+					speed = <10>;
+					full-duplex;
+				};
 			};
 		};
 	};