diff mbox series

powerpc/32s: Fix boot failure with KASAN + SMP + JUMP_LABEL_FEATURE_CHECK_DEBUG

Message ID 2ee707512b8b212b079b877f4ceb525a1606a3fb.1656655567.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show
Series powerpc/32s: Fix boot failure with KASAN + SMP + JUMP_LABEL_FEATURE_CHECK_DEBUG | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_selftests success Successfully ran 10 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_ppctests success Successfully ran 10 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_sparse success Successfully ran 4 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_clang success Successfully ran 7 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_kernel_qemu success Successfully ran 23 jobs.

Commit Message

Christophe Leroy July 1, 2022, 6:06 a.m. UTC
Since commit 4291d085b0b0 ("powerpc/32s: Make pte_update() non
atomic on 603 core"), pte_update() has been using
mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_HPTE_TABLE) to avoid a useless atomic
operation on 603 cores.

When kasan_early_init() sets up the early zero shadow, it uses
__set_pte_at(). On book3s/32, __set_pte_at() calls pte_update()
when CONFIG_SMP is selected in order to ensure the preservation of
_PAGE_HASHPTE in case of concurrent update of the PTE. But that's
too early for mmu_has_feature(), so when
CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL_FEATURE_CHECK_DEBUG is selected, mmu_has_feature()
calls printk(). That's too early to call printk() because KASAN
early zero shadow page is not set up yet. It leads to a deadlock.

However, when kasan_early_init() is called, there is only one CPU
running and no risk of concurrent PTE update. So __set_pte_at() can
be called with the 'percpu' flag. With that flag set, the PTE is
written directly instead of being written via pte_update().

Reported-by: Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
Fixes: 4291d085b0b0 ("powerpc/32s: Make pte_update() non atomic on 603 core")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Michael Ellerman July 29, 2022, 1:02 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 08:06:15 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Since commit 4291d085b0b0 ("powerpc/32s: Make pte_update() non
> atomic on 603 core"), pte_update() has been using
> mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_HPTE_TABLE) to avoid a useless atomic
> operation on 603 cores.
> 
> When kasan_early_init() sets up the early zero shadow, it uses
> __set_pte_at(). On book3s/32, __set_pte_at() calls pte_update()
> when CONFIG_SMP is selected in order to ensure the preservation of
> _PAGE_HASHPTE in case of concurrent update of the PTE. But that's
> too early for mmu_has_feature(), so when
> CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL_FEATURE_CHECK_DEBUG is selected, mmu_has_feature()
> calls printk(). That's too early to call printk() because KASAN
> early zero shadow page is not set up yet. It leads to a deadlock.
> 
> [...]

Applied to powerpc/next.

[1/1] powerpc/32s: Fix boot failure with KASAN + SMP + JUMP_LABEL_FEATURE_CHECK_DEBUG
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/6042a1652d643d1d34fa89bb314cb102960c0800

cheers
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c
index f3e4d069e0ba..a70828a6d935 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/kasan/init_32.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@  static void __init kasan_populate_pte(pte_t *ptep, pgprot_t prot)
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++, ptep++)
-		__set_pte_at(&init_mm, va, ptep, pfn_pte(PHYS_PFN(pa), prot), 0);
+		__set_pte_at(&init_mm, va, ptep, pfn_pte(PHYS_PFN(pa), prot), 1);
 }
 
 int __init kasan_init_shadow_page_tables(unsigned long k_start, unsigned long k_end)