From patchwork Fri May 3 13:01:46 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Joey Gouly X-Patchwork-Id: 1931219 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VWRXK0GB4z1ymj for ; Sat, 4 May 2024 09:17:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VWRXJ6NSyz889C for ; Sat, 4 May 2024 09:17:04 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.110.172; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=joey.gouly@arm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VW9wv3ptcz3cg1 for ; Fri, 3 May 2024 23:03:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16001762; Fri, 3 May 2024 06:03:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e124191.cambridge.arm.com (e124191.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.45]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 503FB3F881; Fri, 3 May 2024 06:03:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Joey Gouly To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v4 28/29] kselftest/arm64: Add test case for POR_EL0 signal frame records Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 14:01:46 +0100 Message-Id: <20240503130147.1154804-29-joey.gouly@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20240503130147.1154804-1-joey.gouly@arm.com> References: <20240503130147.1154804-1-joey.gouly@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 04 May 2024 09:04:53 +1000 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: szabolcs.nagy@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, hpa@zytor.com, shuah@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, will@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, tglx@linutronix.de, oliver.upton@linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Ensure that we get signal context for POR_EL0 if and only if POE is present on the system. Copied from the TPIDR2 test. Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Mark Brown Cc: Shuah Khan Reviewed-by: Mark Brown --- .../testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore | 1 + .../arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore index 1ce5b5eac386..b2f2bfd5c6aa 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ mangle_* fake_sigreturn_* fpmr_* +poe_* sme_* ssve_* sve_* diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d890029304c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (C) 2023 Arm Limited + * + * Verify that the POR_EL0 register context in signal frames is set up as + * expected. + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "test_signals_utils.h" +#include "testcases.h" + +static union { + ucontext_t uc; + char buf[1024 * 128]; +} context; + +#define SYS_POR_EL0 "S3_3_C10_C2_4" + +static uint64_t get_por_el0(void) +{ + uint64_t val; + + asm volatile ( + "mrs %0, " SYS_POR_EL0 "\n" + : "=r"(val) + : + : "cc"); + + return val; +} + +int poe_present(struct tdescr *td, siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc) +{ + struct _aarch64_ctx *head = GET_BUF_RESV_HEAD(context); + struct poe_context *poe_ctx; + size_t offset; + bool in_sigframe; + bool have_poe; + __u64 orig_poe; + + have_poe = getauxval(AT_HWCAP2) & HWCAP2_POE; + if (have_poe) + orig_poe = get_por_el0(); + + if (!get_current_context(td, &context.uc, sizeof(context))) + return 1; + + poe_ctx = (struct poe_context *) + get_header(head, POE_MAGIC, td->live_sz, &offset); + + in_sigframe = poe_ctx != NULL; + + fprintf(stderr, "POR_EL0 sigframe %s on system %s POE\n", + in_sigframe ? "present" : "absent", + have_poe ? "with" : "without"); + + td->pass = (in_sigframe == have_poe); + + /* + * Check that the value we read back was the one present at + * the time that the signal was triggered. + */ + if (have_poe && poe_ctx) { + if (poe_ctx->por_el0 != orig_poe) { + fprintf(stderr, "POR_EL0 in frame is %llx, was %llx\n", + poe_ctx->por_el0, orig_poe); + td->pass = false; + } + } + + return 0; +} + +struct tdescr tde = { + .name = "POR_EL0", + .descr = "Validate that POR_EL0 is present as expected", + .timeout = 3, + .run = poe_present, +};