From patchwork Fri May 3 13:01:27 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Joey Gouly X-Patchwork-Id: 1931204 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VWRP61pnDz1ydX for ; Sat, 4 May 2024 09:10:50 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VWRP60nzSz878Z for ; Sat, 4 May 2024 09:10:50 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.110.172; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=joey.gouly@arm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VW9vr1Znlz3cdZ for ; Fri, 3 May 2024 23:03:04 +1000 (AEST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9246B1682; Fri, 3 May 2024 06:02:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e124191.cambridge.arm.com (e124191.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.45]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 412BC3F73F; Fri, 3 May 2024 06:02:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Joey Gouly To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v4 09/29] KVM: arm64: use `at s1e1a` for POE Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 14:01:27 +0100 Message-Id: <20240503130147.1154804-10-joey.gouly@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20240503130147.1154804-1-joey.gouly@arm.com> References: <20240503130147.1154804-1-joey.gouly@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 04 May 2024 09:04:53 +1000 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: szabolcs.nagy@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, hpa@zytor.com, shuah@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, will@kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, tglx@linutronix.de, oliver.upton@linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" FEAT_ATS1E1A introduces a new instruction: `at s1e1a`. This is an address translation, without permission checks. POE allows read permissions to be removed from S1 by the guest. This means that an `at` instruction could fail, and not get the IPA. Switch to using `at s1e1a` so that KVM can get the IPA regardless of S1 permissions. Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly Cc: Marc Zyngier Cc: Oliver Upton Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/fault.h | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/fault.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/fault.h index 487c06099d6f..17df94570f03 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/fault.h +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/fault.h @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ static inline bool __translate_far_to_hpfar(u64 far, u64 *hpfar) { + int ret; u64 par, tmp; /* @@ -27,7 +28,9 @@ static inline bool __translate_far_to_hpfar(u64 far, u64 *hpfar) * saved the guest context yet, and we may return early... */ par = read_sysreg_par(); - if (!__kvm_at(OP_AT_S1E1R, far)) + ret = system_supports_poe() ? __kvm_at(OP_AT_S1E1A, far) : + __kvm_at(OP_AT_S1E1R, far); + if (!ret) tmp = read_sysreg_par(); else tmp = SYS_PAR_EL1_F; /* back to the guest */