Message ID | 20221130230934.1014142-8-seanjc@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Handled Elsewhere |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=Qu2Gj2AQ; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NMw7W0xkbz23nT for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 10:16:23 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NMw7R5Ddxz3bf4 for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 10:16:19 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=Qu2Gj2AQ; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::104a; helo=mail-pj1-x104a.google.com; envelope-from=3vekhywykdmq2okxtmqyyqvo.mywvsx47zzm-no5vs232.y9vkl2.y1q@flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=Qu2Gj2AQ; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pj1-x104a.google.com (mail-pj1-x104a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::104a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NMvzz2t1Rz3bb1 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 10:09:51 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x104a.google.com with SMTP id r17-20020a17090aa09100b0021903e75f14so152940pjp.9 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 15:09:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=g1stMgF+unVz+1wniuTG4sBb8H6V2BLTtzNNraJ+L2g=; b=Qu2Gj2AQMSdn5ynZ5uRxUGFqbeHyl2Ed5IXeJ2cS9b8RyxUmxP+UPpwD4AXe0Ud2wQ GLE5fpqUn5yzNfMmkf1QqZp6YlOWxyIHZvzY2PTHyliCph5U92Ri7VRil5QNW2hbhlro eqLV3fzPciK364AgPpAWure/pils1YFI032lNHB5vYzqLYNGO/HTaCFu4SnHfGbx0IJL YzVxc9OdZl6JuUto8jah8ZZUeY5Nlgmu8NeURLW2FfXGR4hkpIETaC3DDgh3Y+VWw9aT wnj+XTBDiyARsefNZ1R+h94oYnfXDMDFEaIxFxgvi52xPOyDG50iBdiNI6MjV0enlZkj ltag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=g1stMgF+unVz+1wniuTG4sBb8H6V2BLTtzNNraJ+L2g=; b=0zaa9cU5AbA58gC/YMwLbw8UvZdmDGebqlrkvnop5flOJn7LOy3rhEwrTKhC6v712l iq4K/s9E0gBJbLfErlU4vl/0Ar3xG7eHtvfBXaXdAJBxu/qr6cyiWeHiz4isgm9fp8jq kZGEivXdnN2paUvVucEV7pSjuRMhfrmw5Eh1VY1LcRy+aVcKltnvniaHfns8vfX8Md/7 RitmkTyHiRzpDOvjIQaSMpq2Huq7f5/toWipAVZWmRzoOAfsuefcU1N1qDubio2Rrrh5 +cM66aY3isO/UnaO02cuQRRWNf20j+21CQfW/E0IyqTcL2LjCP/4rO8xW3nrnDB/qBY7 lDMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pn9iwEzhlyOmq+hLIaoHdOBxQOopqK6z+dggQbrhvUM8MvG3X9n KlJVqQPhRQpePpWW0A1aBFOEdJJ2WTM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf66P6cZGe+dew2XFgeia1skilH4V8u9knhT3C8CLrninF2nDNQmOIJQuI+E9fZev+1MNEWaGc+MIJs= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:902:9a47:b0:189:acf9:87af with SMTP id x7-20020a1709029a4700b00189acf987afmr3514511plv.160.1669849789646; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 15:09:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 23:08:51 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20221130230934.1014142-1-seanjc@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20221130230934.1014142-1-seanjc@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog Message-ID: <20221130230934.1014142-8-seanjc@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 07/50] KVM: x86: Do timer initialization after XCR0 configuration From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>, Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>, Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>, <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/> List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>, <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@intel.com>, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>, =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud?= =?utf-8?q?=C3=A9?= <philmd@linaro.org>, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" <linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org> |
Series |
KVM: Rework kvm_init() and hardware enabling
|
expand
|
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index f18f579ebde8..a873618564cd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -9326,13 +9326,13 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque) if (r) goto out_free_percpu; - kvm_timer_init(); - if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE)) { host_xcr0 = xgetbv(XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK); kvm_caps.supported_xcr0 = host_xcr0 & KVM_SUPPORTED_XCR0; } + kvm_timer_init(); + if (pi_inject_timer == -1) pi_inject_timer = housekeeping_enabled(HK_TYPE_TIMER); #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
Move kvm_arch_init()'s call to kvm_timer_init() down a few lines below the XCR0 configuration code. A future patch will move hardware setup into kvm_arch_init() and slot in vendor hardware setup before the call to kvm_timer_init() so that timer initialization (among other stuff) doesn't need to be unwound if vendor setup fails. XCR0 setup on the other hand needs to happen before vendor hardware setup. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)