diff mbox series

KVM: Fix spelling mistake

Message ID 20220623102031.15359-1-jiaming@nfschina.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 392a58f1eaab0c90b80d7ba4a03dbf6eaaeabe60
Headers show
Series KVM: Fix spelling mistake | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_clang success Successfully ran 7 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_ppctests success Successfully ran 10 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_selftests success Successfully ran 10 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_sparse success Successfully ran 4 jobs.
snowpatch_ozlabs/github-powerpc_kernel_qemu success Successfully ran 23 jobs.

Commit Message

Zhang Jiaming June 23, 2022, 10:20 a.m. UTC 
Change 'subsquent' to 'subsequent'.
Change 'accross' to 'across'.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Jiaming <jiaming@nfschina.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Michael Ellerman Dec. 8, 2022, 12:39 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 18:20:31 +0800, Zhang Jiaming wrote:
> Change 'subsquent' to 'subsequent'.
> Change 'accross' to 'across'.
> 
> 

Applied to powerpc/next.

[1/1] KVM: Fix spelling mistake
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/392a58f1eaab0c90b80d7ba4a03dbf6eaaeabe60

cheers
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c
index 4ca23644f752..b4b680f2d853 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@  static int xive_vm_h_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long xirr)
 	if (irq == XICS_IPI || irq == 0) {
 		/*
 		 * This barrier orders the setting of xc->cppr vs.
-		 * subsquent test of xc->mfrr done inside
+		 * subsequent test of xc->mfrr done inside
 		 * scan_interrupts and push_pending_to_hw
 		 */
 		smp_mb();
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@  static int xive_vm_h_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long xirr)
 	/*
 	 * This barrier orders both setting of in_eoi above vs,
 	 * subsequent test of guest_priority, and the setting
-	 * of xc->cppr vs. subsquent test of xc->mfrr done inside
+	 * of xc->cppr vs. subsequent test of xc->mfrr done inside
 	 * scan_interrupts and push_pending_to_hw
 	 */
 	smp_mb();
@@ -2392,7 +2392,7 @@  static int xive_set_source(struct kvmppc_xive *xive, long irq, u64 addr)
 	/*
 	 * Now, we select a target if we have one. If we don't we
 	 * leave the interrupt untargetted. It means that an interrupt
-	 * can become "untargetted" accross migration if it was masked
+	 * can become "untargetted" across migration if it was masked
 	 * by set_xive() but there is little we can do about it.
 	 */