From patchwork Fri Mar 18 11:41:33 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kajol Jain X-Patchwork-Id: 1606967 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=AJRthOow; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KKhwh4N6xz9s3q for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 22:43:32 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KKhwh2mFqz3bXs for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 22:43:32 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=AJRthOow; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=kjain@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=AJRthOow; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KKhvk0Jxdz3069 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 22:42:41 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 22IA1AkH010450; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:42:10 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=PLM4n8qjJqrE3Cjj5JCJoGMbbopc5RimsQ9g3vFE+/0=; b=AJRthOow6U7CeltWc3QIx82nrXQ9Rr+KBMRe2qeh2yoZD22J3Nqf6i7NTNc54e2sYco6 ZK0jf444F6QHwQtTWDYTu6luj7SP1WrKclrnkJDb7EjUztV82VKL0i1DoPR9Zf7/GCX/ n5hiugVJcPnDlpU27y51Zbm5bY2JBnRD8LsenxlPF5ko5xNgabjZYEDkpWiHcNJ7ztGm DXtVp1TWRaUhScP40WHZzWOBdzoctvxYBjGUI2zd21uBis9/RWjNZoZ+bOkXeXO6T0e/ qK4xPjKbniMc09Zlpx980d9ME5PiV30H7/JTSsfYpSQB1lkgma/EhfbY4R8WBi9IA4Ad Wg== Received: from ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (6c.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.108]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3euwuj82fa-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:42:10 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 22IBWkOl002984; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:42:08 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3erk58ue6h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:42:08 +0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 22IBg77Q45678926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:42:07 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCFC5204E; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:42:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-e8dccbcc-2adc-11b2-a85c-bc1f33b9b810.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.108.37]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C285204F; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:41:58 +0000 (GMT) From: Kajol Jain To: mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au Subject: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/papr_scm: Fix build failure when CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS is not set Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 17:11:33 +0530 Message-Id: <20220318114133.113627-2-kjain@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20220318114133.113627-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220318114133.113627-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: y20dBBu5ydz6wAu1HCWxEEOO44rvR380 X-Proofpoint-GUID: y20dBBu5ydz6wAu1HCWxEEOO44rvR380 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.850,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-03-18_08,2022-03-15_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2203180064 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: santosh@fossix.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com, vaibhav@linux.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The following build failure occures when CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS is not set as generic pmu functions are not visible in that scenario. arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:372:35: error: ‘struct perf_event’ has no member named ‘attr’ p->nvdimm_events_map[event->attr.config], ^~ In file included from ./include/linux/list.h:5, from ./include/linux/kobject.h:19, from ./include/linux/of.h:17, from arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:5: arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c: In function ‘papr_scm_pmu_event_init’: arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:389:49: error: ‘struct perf_event’ has no member named ‘pmu’ struct nvdimm_pmu *nd_pmu = to_nvdimm_pmu(event->pmu); ^~ ./include/linux/container_of.h:18:26: note: in definition of macro ‘container_of’ void *__mptr = (void *)(ptr); \ ^~~ arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:389:30: note: in expansion of macro ‘to_nvdimm_pmu’ struct nvdimm_pmu *nd_pmu = to_nvdimm_pmu(event->pmu); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ./include/linux/bits.h:22, from ./include/linux/bitops.h:6, from ./include/linux/of.h:15, from arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:5: Fix the build issue by adding check for CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS config option and disabling the papr_scm perf interface support incase this config is not set Fixes: 4c08d4bbc089 ("powerpc/papr_scm: Add perf interface support") (Commit id based on linux-next tree) Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain --- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) --- - This fix patch changes are added and tested on top of linux-next tree on the 'next-20220315' branch. --- diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c index 4f65bc0fb861..ffe85aeb4127 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c @@ -19,7 +19,10 @@ #include #include #include + +#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS #include +#endif #define BIND_ANY_ADDR (~0ul) @@ -69,7 +72,9 @@ #define PAPR_SCM_PERF_STATS_EYECATCHER __stringify(SCMSTATS) #define PAPR_SCM_PERF_STATS_VERSION 0x1 +#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS #define to_nvdimm_pmu(_pmu) container_of(_pmu, struct nvdimm_pmu, pmu) +#endif /* Struct holding a single performance metric */ struct papr_scm_perf_stat { @@ -127,8 +132,10 @@ struct papr_scm_priv { /* The bits which needs to be overridden */ u64 health_bitmap_inject_mask; +#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS /* array to have event_code and stat_id mappings */ char **nvdimm_events_map; +#endif }; static int papr_scm_pmem_flush(struct nd_region *nd_region, @@ -349,6 +356,7 @@ static ssize_t drc_pmem_query_stats(struct papr_scm_priv *p, return 0; } +#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS static int papr_scm_pmu_get_value(struct perf_event *event, struct device *dev, u64 *count) { struct papr_scm_perf_stat *stat; @@ -560,6 +568,7 @@ static void papr_scm_pmu_register(struct papr_scm_priv *p) pmu_err_print: dev_info(&p->pdev->dev, "nvdimm pmu didn't register rc=%d\n", rc); } +#endif /* * Issue hcall to retrieve dimm health info and populate papr_scm_priv with the @@ -1537,7 +1546,10 @@ static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err2; platform_set_drvdata(pdev, p); + +#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS papr_scm_pmu_register(p); +#endif return 0; @@ -1557,11 +1569,14 @@ static int papr_scm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus); drc_pmem_unbind(p); +#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS if (pdev->archdata.priv) unregister_nvdimm_pmu(pdev->archdata.priv); pdev->archdata.priv = NULL; kfree(p->nvdimm_events_map); +#endif + kfree(p->bus_desc.provider_name); kfree(p);