From patchwork Mon Oct 25 05:56:49 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 1545549 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=suEt4ooc; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hd44F59TCz9sRR for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:57:49 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Hd44F23wFz2yJV for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:57:49 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=suEt4ooc; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=suEt4ooc; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hd43w4JFKz2xXV for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:57:32 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19P2BWXZ002897; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 01:57:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=Yrql1A3zEoiaAiMlCrkjNOeG6UgXSyYESM54IDW+hFk=; b=suEt4ooclPP0tyttxqJDvy7wswcpj/GS1zfRzCU5gpsNhg4vWmSQgmFVskHtXlXoWx9P /5e4KTQW+EVaTpMymRP4WhZUKlqHfhJ15XSgm7mgvGQ1UELQ/NY8taRkRpxiIyDmJ9c8 RwmGEbopdQow5dO6ll6hHCnlzbizVvIDpxw3LuSqolqyKoy3Ek2gqfdrKdBEs+MqZiS5 xcH+bRUEGIgM1+8gfoL+3Zrwvrf+XHF0SRSDlHcQyV4/qzvFRw07IhdLqPb59iZcOLsg dkY6l5yT4PFG5DZmlQsV1wcjtdeh0E8uqoxFEZqHXyJhZjhB7Xu0bbf6hQq3akMekrl7 Pg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bvy9q1fh2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 01:57:07 -0400 Received: from m0098420.ppops.net (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 19P4rcuv025532; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 01:57:07 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bvy9q1fgn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 01:57:07 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19P5slqA010679; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:57:05 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3bva1ahxt0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:57:05 +0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 19P5v17W53477784 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:57:01 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1D252051; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:57:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hbathini-workstation.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.32.58]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39E25204E; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:56:57 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini To: naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, jniethe5@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, mpe@ellerman.id.au, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/bpf: fix write protecting JIT code Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:26:49 +0530 Message-Id: <20211025055649.114728-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: HgdCVfj6g5biGbYpPc1Iq424TT_6zGG3 X-Proofpoint-GUID: w8HwfKcXREudIYwCbb2537m7_fCPXTjl X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-25_01,2021-10-25_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110250032 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: songliubraving@fb.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, yhs@fb.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kafai@fb.com, Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Running program with bpf-to-bpf function calls results in data access exception (0x300) with the below call trace: [c000000000113f28] bpf_int_jit_compile+0x238/0x750 (unreliable) [c00000000037d2f8] bpf_check+0x2008/0x2710 [c000000000360050] bpf_prog_load+0xb00/0x13a0 [c000000000361d94] __sys_bpf+0x6f4/0x27c0 [c000000000363f0c] sys_bpf+0x2c/0x40 [c000000000032434] system_call_exception+0x164/0x330 [c00000000000c1e8] system_call_vectored_common+0xe8/0x278 as bpf_int_jit_compile() tries writing to write protected JIT code location during the extra pass. Fix it by holding off write protection of JIT code until the extra pass, where branch target addresses fixup happens. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 62e3d4210ac9 ("powerpc/bpf: Write protect JIT code") Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index fcbf7a917c56..90ce75f0f1e2 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -241,8 +241,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) fp->jited_len = alloclen; bpf_flush_icache(bpf_hdr, (u8 *)bpf_hdr + (bpf_hdr->pages * PAGE_SIZE)); - bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(bpf_hdr); if (!fp->is_func || extra_pass) { + bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(bpf_hdr); bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(fp, addrs); out_addrs: kfree(addrs);