From patchwork Wed Sep 29 11:18:52 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 1534317 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=E6+09MKQ; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HKDVp1PB0z9tkD for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 21:22:26 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HKDVn6kDtz3cHW for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 21:22:25 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=E6+09MKQ; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=E6+09MKQ; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HKDRy1Cvpz308J for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 21:19:57 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 18TAl8CS022743; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 07:19:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=tX1JpSU8Jx3BumFLWAt7KQs9Mmvi0E/h50170qbhMMY=; b=E6+09MKQepWRsEPvlLZ/q7ge+CbRkqaTy1G3K0JuMuYFQa+2ffkvmahnvyE8ax03yaf6 onJytkopOMT3YthEYDsjhfpeY/AhAEb3uo7BrlVtqs1agBPKrGCMazkCY1vDGvlVYqoM QBgZNl70PZvwRmYM6Ajkfj2lKw/3O+0QLkCtLA24pyVRnO9WMcvHw+8rcCRO7BXn3E/h cuarguon2k0GX+vxP/Lfb3bXsukdcDaAaxDyMigbd8qc4O8qpcs2zHxhcn0vFU212aiO WuteZfP5NFoN8l/iTsx6FKqiTx7Lz0w9zkXRPnnr3nQSTxAkimXp55P75PIgdRlhvDxs Eg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bcj1k7dd6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 Sep 2021 07:19:38 -0400 Received: from m0098421.ppops.net (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 18TAmwLn008649; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 07:19:37 -0400 Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bcj1k7dcn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 Sep 2021 07:19:37 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 18TBDQZU010226; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:19:35 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3b9u1jq7yc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:19:35 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 18TBJWFR54002092 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:19:32 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0254D42079; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:19:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4517442068; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:19:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hbathini-workstation.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.83.199]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:19:26 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini To: naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, mpe@ellerman.id.au, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net Subject: [PATCH v4 5/8] bpf ppc64: Add BPF_PROBE_MEM support for JIT Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:48:52 +0530 Message-Id: <20210929111855.50254-6-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210929111855.50254-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210929111855.50254-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 9IMz45n2fmsziGfdLhBDxyGunBWg39Xe X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: uoRH87fzTkqi67xgY8cfxk_3ZHwSnBg1 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-09-29_04,2021-09-29_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2109290068 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ravi Bangoria , songliubraving@fb.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, yhs@fb.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kafai@fb.com, Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Ravi Bangoria BPF load instruction with BPF_PROBE_MEM mode can cause a fault inside kernel. Append exception table for such instructions within BPF program. Unlike other archs which uses extable 'fixup' field to pass dest_reg and nip, BPF exception table on PowerPC follows the generic PowerPC exception table design, where it populates both fixup and extable sections within BPF program. fixup section contains two instructions, first instruction clears dest_reg and 2nd jumps to next instruction in the BPF code. extable 'insn' field contains relative offset of the instruction and 'fixup' field contains relative offset of the fixup entry. Example layout of BPF program with extable present: +------------------+ | | | | 0x4020 -->| ld r27,4(r3) | | | | | 0x40ac -->| lwz r3,0(r4) | | | | | |------------------| 0x4280 -->| li r27,0 | \ fixup entry | b 0x4024 | / 0x4288 -->| li r3,0 | | b 0x40b0 | |------------------| 0x4290 -->| insn=0xfffffd90 | \ extable entry | fixup=0xffffffec | / 0x4298 -->| insn=0xfffffe14 | | fixup=0xffffffec | +------------------+ (Addresses shown here are chosen random, not real) Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy --- Changes in v4: * Dropped explicit fallthrough statement for empty switch cases. arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 8 +++- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 2 +- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 13 +++++- 4 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h index 0c8f885b8f48..561689a2abdf 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h @@ -141,8 +141,11 @@ struct codegen_context { unsigned int idx; unsigned int stack_size; int b2p[ARRAY_SIZE(b2p)]; + unsigned int exentry_idx; }; +#define BPF_FIXUP_LEN 2 /* Two instructions => 8 bytes */ + static inline void bpf_flush_icache(void *start, void *end) { smp_wmb(); /* smp write barrier */ @@ -166,11 +169,14 @@ static inline void bpf_clear_seen_register(struct codegen_context *ctx, int i) void bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func); int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, - u32 *addrs); + u32 *addrs, int pass); void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx); void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx); void bpf_jit_realloc_regs(struct codegen_context *ctx); +int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, int pass, struct codegen_context *ctx, + int insn_idx, int jmp_off, int dst_reg); + #endif #endif diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index c5c9e8ad1de7..f02457c6b54f 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -101,6 +101,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) struct bpf_prog *tmp_fp; bool bpf_blinded = false; bool extra_pass = false; + u32 extable_len; + u32 fixup_len; if (!fp->jit_requested) return org_fp; @@ -131,7 +133,6 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) image = jit_data->image; bpf_hdr = jit_data->header; proglen = jit_data->proglen; - alloclen = proglen + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE; extra_pass = true; goto skip_init_ctx; } @@ -149,7 +150,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) cgctx.stack_size = round_up(fp->aux->stack_depth, 16); /* Scouting faux-generate pass 0 */ - if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, 0, &cgctx, addrs)) { + if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, 0, &cgctx, addrs, 0)) { /* We hit something illegal or unsupported. */ fp = org_fp; goto out_addrs; @@ -162,7 +163,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) */ if (cgctx.seen & SEEN_TAILCALL) { cgctx.idx = 0; - if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, 0, &cgctx, addrs)) { + if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, 0, &cgctx, addrs, 0)) { fp = org_fp; goto out_addrs; } @@ -177,8 +178,11 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) bpf_jit_build_prologue(0, &cgctx); bpf_jit_build_epilogue(0, &cgctx); + fixup_len = fp->aux->num_exentries * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4; + extable_len = fp->aux->num_exentries * sizeof(struct exception_table_entry); + proglen = cgctx.idx * 4; - alloclen = proglen + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE; + alloclen = proglen + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE + fixup_len + extable_len; bpf_hdr = bpf_jit_binary_alloc(alloclen, &image, 4, bpf_jit_fill_ill_insns); if (!bpf_hdr) { @@ -186,6 +190,9 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) goto out_addrs; } + if (extable_len) + fp->aux->extable = (void *)image + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE + proglen + fixup_len; + skip_init_ctx: code_base = (u32 *)(image + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE); @@ -210,7 +217,11 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) /* Now build the prologue, body code & epilogue for real. */ cgctx.idx = 0; bpf_jit_build_prologue(code_base, &cgctx); - bpf_jit_build_body(fp, code_base, &cgctx, addrs); + if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, code_base, &cgctx, addrs, pass)) { + bpf_jit_binary_free(bpf_hdr); + fp = org_fp; + goto out_addrs; + } bpf_jit_build_epilogue(code_base, &cgctx); if (bpf_jit_enable > 1) @@ -234,7 +245,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) fp->bpf_func = (void *)image; fp->jited = 1; - fp->jited_len = alloclen; + fp->jited_len = proglen + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE; bpf_flush_icache(bpf_hdr, (u8 *)bpf_hdr + (bpf_hdr->pages * PAGE_SIZE)); bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(bpf_hdr); @@ -258,3 +269,50 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) return fp; } + +/* + * The caller should check for (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) before calling + * this function, as this only applies to BPF_PROBE_MEM, for now. + */ +int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, int pass, struct codegen_context *ctx, + int insn_idx, int jmp_off, int dst_reg) +{ + off_t offset; + unsigned long pc; + struct exception_table_entry *ex; + u32 *fixup; + + /* Populate extable entries only in the last pass */ + if (pass != 2) + return 0; + + if (!fp->aux->extable || + WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->exentry_idx >= fp->aux->num_exentries)) + return -EINVAL; + + pc = (unsigned long)&image[insn_idx]; + + fixup = (void *)fp->aux->extable - + (fp->aux->num_exentries * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4) + + (ctx->exentry_idx * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4); + + fixup[0] = PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0); + + fixup[BPF_FIXUP_LEN - 1] = + PPC_RAW_BRANCH((long)(pc + jmp_off) - (long)&fixup[BPF_FIXUP_LEN - 1]); + + ex = &fp->aux->extable[ctx->exentry_idx]; + + offset = pc - (long)&ex->insn; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(offset >= 0 || offset < INT_MIN)) + return -ERANGE; + ex->insn = offset; + + offset = (long)fixup - (long)&ex->fixup; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(offset >= 0 || offset < INT_MIN)) + return -ERANGE; + ex->fixup = offset; + + ctx->exentry_idx++; + return 0; +} diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index 65a4d1ed97bf..c04291517a7e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 /* Assemble the body code between the prologue & epilogue */ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, - u32 *addrs) + u32 *addrs, int pass) { const struct bpf_insn *insn = fp->insnsi; int flen = fp->len; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 49e6e0b6e4d2..4170999371ee 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 /* Assemble the body code between the prologue & epilogue */ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, - u32 *addrs) + u32 *addrs, int pass) { const struct bpf_insn *insn = fp->insnsi; int flen = fp->len; @@ -717,12 +717,16 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * */ /* dst = *(u8 *)(ul) (src + off) */ case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B: + case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_B: /* dst = *(u16 *)(ul) (src + off) */ case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H: + case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_H: /* dst = *(u32 *)(ul) (src + off) */ case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W: + case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_W: /* dst = *(u64 *)(ul) (src + off) */ case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW: + case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_DW: switch (size) { case BPF_B: EMIT(PPC_RAW_LBZ(dst_reg, src_reg, off)); @@ -740,6 +744,13 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * if (size != BPF_DW && insn_is_zext(&insn[i + 1])) addrs[++i] = ctx->idx * 4; + + if (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) { + ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, pass, ctx, ctx->idx - 1, + 4, dst_reg); + if (ret) + return ret; + } break; /*