From patchwork Wed Jun 16 03:52:34 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Claire Chang X-Patchwork-Id: 1492660 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=jc3T7c7V; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4G4WZP1Hkyz9sX2 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:56:13 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4G4WZP5Wrxz3c58 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:56:13 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=jc3T7c7V; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f; helo=mail-pj1-x102f.google.com; envelope-from=tientzu@chromium.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=jc3T7c7V; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4G4WWb3KgMz3c1m for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:53:47 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id k5so917021pjj.1 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:53:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e9Vw6CwKftyWUkkMr8FpV3VZb4mbe4UuYsuH+xmCJ+M=; b=jc3T7c7VZDi587k2gT/eeg1/s25EMO4Lxy72AFhkTEa79olBru5uzce93B9VJJc7mb tv4xxblNNZSpK3BVn4J++3E61DthzfhVz93hD3eVM82+a9MHX0s1kWeLhR0ckmjZau/d yaE/e99lxczNFRLPelQucPShcgrTyXCG38jN8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e9Vw6CwKftyWUkkMr8FpV3VZb4mbe4UuYsuH+xmCJ+M=; b=mfvNJXmO41bPl/cffSJvvccPu/i74nhda0lKt4kLrGuVHHs/0M34W7UScs9Zsnka27 TO0pDzfamooO156q3iSXJx9DhcmxGroYCKzJ0UVG0rSOY+iZsdeqW9F/hBWOdFBnRPc7 7lI8l3DUnk0uhhEZlsEKxJTao+mXNdYkidR3knwzJvyzdUjDVTEElA3jEGC6aq9fQtRe o2uaJJ08rZqdE+UlC6sotCDcu3EM0yQtQ0dMqgeDq4FZAyv1INf9PaNIY3hRwh4Anxqn vkPIBgbFsJVkX62/F6mzil9m9HttwbpkFMsai+RmRO/NwYLpkDYgB9HkRuauCLBTGhzn QsOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532xfpuP2lOwY97H7jBZLgFQVFYFmM8uMtUvjgf5Ipi+yApptWLI Q+mWFJzfLsJv+SbOm65so1KxOw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzC2GZu70JiqqjaeNpM5+wD1r3IbZYNkxwRBj90E6QvUGdzry0LzgTDbMYz2ZJVNaBcQldqkQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:318:: with SMTP id ay24mr8150844pjb.150.1623815624668; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:53:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2401:fa00:95:205:3d52:f252:7393:1992]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id i21sm523349pfd.219.2021.06.15.20.53.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:53:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Claire Chang To: Rob Herring , mpe@ellerman.id.au, Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Frank Rowand , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com, Christoph Hellwig , Marek Szyprowski Subject: [PATCH v11 06/12] swiotlb: Use is_dev_swiotlb_force for swiotlb data bouncing Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:52:34 +0800 Message-Id: <20210616035240.840463-7-tientzu@chromium.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0.272.g935e593368-goog In-Reply-To: <20210616035240.840463-1-tientzu@chromium.org> References: <20210616035240.840463-1-tientzu@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org, mingo@kernel.org, jxgao@google.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, Saravana Kannan , xypron.glpk@gmx.de, "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Bartosz Golaszewski , bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Thierry Reding , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com, linux-devicetree , daniel@ffwll.ch, airlied@linux.ie, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, Nicolas Boichat , rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com, tientzu@chromium.org, Dan Williams , Andy Shevchenko , Greg KH , Randy Dunlap , lkml , tfiga@chromium.org, "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" , Jim Quinlan , Robin Murphy , bauerman@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Propagate the swiotlb_force setting into io_tlb_default_mem->force and use it to determine whether to bounce the data or not. This will be useful later to allow for different pools. Signed-off-by: Claire Chang Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig --- include/linux/swiotlb.h | 11 +++++++++++ kernel/dma/direct.c | 2 +- kernel/dma/direct.h | 2 +- kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 4 ++++ 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h index dd1c30a83058..efcd56e3a16c 100644 --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ extern enum swiotlb_force swiotlb_force; * unmap calls. * @debugfs: The dentry to debugfs. * @late_alloc: %true if allocated using the page allocator + * @force: %true if swiotlb is forced */ struct io_tlb_mem { phys_addr_t start; @@ -94,6 +95,7 @@ struct io_tlb_mem { spinlock_t lock; struct dentry *debugfs; bool late_alloc; + bool force; struct io_tlb_slot { phys_addr_t orig_addr; size_t alloc_size; @@ -109,6 +111,11 @@ static inline bool is_swiotlb_buffer(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr) return mem && paddr >= mem->start && paddr < mem->end; } +static inline bool is_dev_swiotlb_force(struct device *dev) +{ + return dev->dma_io_tlb_mem->force; +} + void __init swiotlb_exit(void); unsigned int swiotlb_max_segment(void); size_t swiotlb_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev); @@ -120,6 +127,10 @@ static inline bool is_swiotlb_buffer(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr) { return false; } +static inline bool is_dev_swiotlb_force(struct device *dev) +{ + return false; +} static inline void swiotlb_exit(void) { } diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c index 7a88c34d0867..3713461d6fe0 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ size_t dma_direct_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev) { /* If SWIOTLB is active, use its maximum mapping size */ if (is_swiotlb_active(dev) && - (dma_addressing_limited(dev) || swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE)) + (dma_addressing_limited(dev) || is_dev_swiotlb_force(dev))) return swiotlb_max_mapping_size(dev); return SIZE_MAX; } diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.h b/kernel/dma/direct.h index 13e9e7158d94..6c4d13caceb1 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/direct.h +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.h @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_page(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys = page_to_phys(page) + offset; dma_addr_t dma_addr = phys_to_dma(dev, phys); - if (unlikely(swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE)) + if (is_dev_swiotlb_force(dev)) return swiotlb_map(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs); if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, true))) { diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index 101abeb0a57d..a9907ac262fc 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -179,6 +179,10 @@ static void swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem(struct io_tlb_mem *mem, phys_addr_t start, mem->end = mem->start + bytes; mem->index = 0; mem->late_alloc = late_alloc; + + if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE) + mem->force = true; + spin_lock_init(&mem->lock); for (i = 0; i < mem->nslabs; i++) { mem->slots[i].list = IO_TLB_SEGSIZE - io_tlb_offset(i);