Message ID | 20210421025605.10868-1-rdunlap@infradead.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] powerpc: make ALTIVEC select PPC_FPU | expand |
Related | show |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
snowpatch_ozlabs/apply_patch | success | Successfully applied on branch powerpc/merge (40f5c8e99b3f2f53db08055f415af2aac416360e) |
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64le | success | Build succeeded |
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64be | success | Build succeeded |
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64e | success | Build succeeded |
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-pmac32 | success | Build succeeded |
snowpatch_ozlabs/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 21 lines checked |
snowpatch_ozlabs/needsstable | success | Patch has no Fixes tags |
Le 21/04/2021 à 04:56, Randy Dunlap a écrit : > On a kernel config with ALTIVEC=y and PPC_FPU not set/enabled, > there are build errors: > > drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c:262:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'enable_kernel_fp' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > enable_kernel_fp(); > ../arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c: In function 'do_vec_load': > ../arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c:637:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'put_vr' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 637 | put_vr(rn, &u.v); > | ^~~~~~ > ../arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c: In function 'do_vec_store': > ../arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c:660:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_vr'; did you mean 'get_oc'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 660 | get_vr(rn, &u.v); > | ^~~~~~ > > In theory ALTIVEC is independent of PPC_FPU but in practice nobody > is going to build such a machine, so make ALTIVEC require PPC_FPU > by selecting it. > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> > Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> > Cc: lkp@intel.com > --- > v2: change ALTIVEC depends on PPC_FPU to select (Christophe and Michael) > > arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) > > --- linux-next-20210416.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/Kconfig > +++ linux-next-20210416/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/Kconfig > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ menuconfig PPC_86xx > bool "86xx-based boards" > depends on PPC_BOOK3S_32 > select FSL_SOC > + select PPC_FPU Now that ALTIVEC selects PPC_FPU by itself, I don't think you need that. > select ALTIVEC > help > The Freescale E600 SoCs have 74xx cores. > --- linux-next-20210416.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype > +++ linux-next-20210416/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype > @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ config E300C3_CPU > config G4_CPU > bool "G4 (74xx)" > depends on PPC_BOOK3S_32 > + select PPC_FPU Same > select ALTIVEC > > endchoice > @@ -310,6 +311,7 @@ config PHYS_64BIT > config ALTIVEC > bool "AltiVec Support" > depends on PPC_BOOK3S_32 || PPC_BOOK3S_64 || (PPC_E500MC && PPC64) > + select PPC_FPU > help > This option enables kernel support for the Altivec extensions to the > PowerPC processor. The kernel currently supports saving and restoring >
On 4/20/21 10:19 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 21/04/2021 à 04:56, Randy Dunlap a écrit : >> On a kernel config with ALTIVEC=y and PPC_FPU not set/enabled, >> there are build errors: >> >> drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c:262:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'enable_kernel_fp' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >> enable_kernel_fp(); >> ../arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c: In function 'do_vec_load': >> ../arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c:637:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'put_vr' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> 637 | put_vr(rn, &u.v); >> | ^~~~~~ >> ../arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c: In function 'do_vec_store': >> ../arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c:660:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_vr'; did you mean 'get_oc'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> 660 | get_vr(rn, &u.v); >> | ^~~~~~ >> >> In theory ALTIVEC is independent of PPC_FPU but in practice nobody >> is going to build such a machine, so make ALTIVEC require PPC_FPU >> by selecting it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> >> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> >> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org >> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> >> Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> >> Cc: lkp@intel.com >> --- >> v2: change ALTIVEC depends on PPC_FPU to select (Christophe and Michael) >> >> arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/Kconfig | 1 + >> arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype | 2 ++ >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> --- linux-next-20210416.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/Kconfig >> +++ linux-next-20210416/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/Kconfig >> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ menuconfig PPC_86xx >> bool "86xx-based boards" >> depends on PPC_BOOK3S_32 >> select FSL_SOC >> + select PPC_FPU > > Now that ALTIVEC selects PPC_FPU by itself, I don't think you need that. > >> select ALTIVEC >> help >> The Freescale E600 SoCs have 74xx cores. >> --- linux-next-20210416.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype >> +++ linux-next-20210416/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype >> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ config E300C3_CPU >> config G4_CPU >> bool "G4 (74xx)" >> depends on PPC_BOOK3S_32 >> + select PPC_FPU > > Same Of course. v3 coming up. Thanks. >> select ALTIVEC >> endchoice >> @@ -310,6 +311,7 @@ config PHYS_64BIT >> config ALTIVEC >> bool "AltiVec Support" >> depends on PPC_BOOK3S_32 || PPC_BOOK3S_64 || (PPC_E500MC && PPC64) >> + select PPC_FPU >> help >> This option enables kernel support for the Altivec extensions to the >> PowerPC processor. The kernel currently supports saving and restoring >>
--- linux-next-20210416.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/Kconfig +++ linux-next-20210416/arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/Kconfig @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ menuconfig PPC_86xx bool "86xx-based boards" depends on PPC_BOOK3S_32 select FSL_SOC + select PPC_FPU select ALTIVEC help The Freescale E600 SoCs have 74xx cores. --- linux-next-20210416.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype +++ linux-next-20210416/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ config E300C3_CPU config G4_CPU bool "G4 (74xx)" depends on PPC_BOOK3S_32 + select PPC_FPU select ALTIVEC endchoice @@ -310,6 +311,7 @@ config PHYS_64BIT config ALTIVEC bool "AltiVec Support" depends on PPC_BOOK3S_32 || PPC_BOOK3S_64 || (PPC_E500MC && PPC64) + select PPC_FPU help This option enables kernel support for the Altivec extensions to the PowerPC processor. The kernel currently supports saving and restoring
On a kernel config with ALTIVEC=y and PPC_FPU not set/enabled, there are build errors: drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c:262:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'enable_kernel_fp' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] enable_kernel_fp(); ../arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c: In function 'do_vec_load': ../arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c:637:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'put_vr' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 637 | put_vr(rn, &u.v); | ^~~~~~ ../arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c: In function 'do_vec_store': ../arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c:660:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_vr'; did you mean 'get_oc'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 660 | get_vr(rn, &u.v); | ^~~~~~ In theory ALTIVEC is independent of PPC_FPU but in practice nobody is going to build such a machine, so make ALTIVEC require PPC_FPU by selecting it. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: lkp@intel.com --- v2: change ALTIVEC depends on PPC_FPU to select (Christophe and Michael) arch/powerpc/platforms/86xx/Kconfig | 1 + arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)