diff mbox series

[v3,13/14] powerpc/eeh: Drop pdn use in eeh_pe_tree_insert()

Message ID 20200725081231.39076-13-oohall@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 31595ae5aece519be5faa2e2013278ce45894d26
Headers show
Series [v3,01/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic() | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
snowpatch_ozlabs/apply_patch success Successfully applied on branch powerpc/merge (163c4334d6564fc8cb638d9f816ef5e1db1b8f1d)
snowpatch_ozlabs/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 48 lines checked
snowpatch_ozlabs/needsstable success Patch has no Fixes tags

Commit Message

Oliver O'Halloran July 25, 2020, 8:12 a.m. UTC
This is mostly just to make the subsequent diffs less noisy. No functional
changes.

One thing that needs calling out is the removal of the "config_addr"
variable and replacing it with edev->bdfn. The contents of edev->bdfn are
the same, however it's worth pointing out that what RTAS calls a
"config_addr" isn't the same as the bdfn. The config_addr is supposed to
be: <bus><devfn><reg> with each field being an 8 bit number. Various parts
of the EEH code use BDFN and "config_addr" as interchangeable quantities
even though they aren't really.

Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
---
v2: no changes
v3: no changes
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c | 15 +++++++--------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
index 97bf09db2ecd..898205829a8f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
@@ -366,9 +366,8 @@  static struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get_parent(struct eeh_dev *edev)
  */
 int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
 {
+	struct pci_controller *hose = edev->controller;
 	struct eeh_pe *pe, *parent;
-	struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
-	int config_addr = (pdn->busno << 8) | (pdn->devfn);
 
 	/* Check if the PE number is valid */
 	if (!eeh_has_flag(EEH_VALID_PE_ZERO) && !edev->pe_config_addr) {
@@ -382,7 +381,7 @@  int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
 	 * PE should be composed of PCI bus and its subordinate
 	 * components.
 	 */
-	pe = eeh_pe_get(pdn->phb, edev->pe_config_addr, config_addr);
+	pe = eeh_pe_get(hose, edev->pe_config_addr, edev->bdfn);
 	if (pe) {
 		if (pe->type & EEH_PE_INVALID) {
 			list_add_tail(&edev->entry, &pe->edevs);
@@ -416,15 +415,15 @@  int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
 
 	/* Create a new EEH PE */
 	if (edev->physfn)
-		pe = eeh_pe_alloc(pdn->phb, EEH_PE_VF);
+		pe = eeh_pe_alloc(hose, EEH_PE_VF);
 	else
-		pe = eeh_pe_alloc(pdn->phb, EEH_PE_DEVICE);
+		pe = eeh_pe_alloc(hose, EEH_PE_DEVICE);
 	if (!pe) {
 		pr_err("%s: out of memory!\n", __func__);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 	pe->addr	= edev->pe_config_addr;
-	pe->config_addr	= config_addr;
+	pe->config_addr	= edev->bdfn;
 
 	/*
 	 * Put the new EEH PE into hierarchy tree. If the parent
@@ -434,10 +433,10 @@  int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
 	 */
 	parent = eeh_pe_get_parent(edev);
 	if (!parent) {
-		parent = eeh_phb_pe_get(pdn->phb);
+		parent = eeh_phb_pe_get(hose);
 		if (!parent) {
 			pr_err("%s: No PHB PE is found (PHB Domain=%d)\n",
-				__func__, pdn->phb->global_number);
+				__func__, hose->global_number);
 			edev->pe = NULL;
 			kfree(pe);
 			return -EEXIST;