Message ID | 20120608103249.GA10321@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote: > > BTW, should I be using a signed tag for this? I don't require signed tags, at least not for git.kernel.org pulls from people I know and that looks perfectly normal. That said, about a third of the merges I have done for 3.5 have had signatures, and it's kind of nice. It's another small nice detail to have, and the fact that the tag message just automatically makes it into my merge message buffer is convenient. So it's not a big deal for something like this (in contrast: for github or other slighly more anonymous pull requests I *really* prefer it), but I think it's a nice habit to get into. Whatever works for you, Linus