| Message ID | 1540220060-30162-2-git-send-email-leitao@debian.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | c36c5ffd5173bad377749c136718f3c77d896691 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/9] powerpc/64s: Include cpu header | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| snowpatch_ozlabs/apply_patch | success | next/apply_patch Successfully applied |
| snowpatch_ozlabs/checkpatch | success | Test checkpatch on branch next |
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c index 67619b4b3f96..c325dedfee73 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int eeh_result_priority(enum pci_ers_result result) } }; -const char *pci_ers_result_name(enum pci_ers_result result) +static const char *pci_ers_result_name(enum pci_ers_result result) { switch (result) { case PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE:
Function pci_ers_result_name() is a static function, although not declared as such. This was detected by sparse in the following warning arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c:63:12: warning: symbol 'pci_ers_result_name' was not declared. Should it be static? This patch simply declares the function a static. Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)