From patchwork Fri Jan 12 17:25:50 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Laurent Dufour X-Patchwork-Id: 860097 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [103.22.144.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3zJ97p6hKjz9sBd for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 04:43:02 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3zJ97p51wdzF0w9 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 04:43:02 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3zJ8n357tdzF0lP for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 04:26:47 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0CHOONC114426 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:26:45 -0500 Received: from e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.108]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2fewbqynxm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:26:45 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:26:41 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.142) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:26:33 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w0CHQXTQ30802098; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:26:33 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BD942042; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:20:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3720C42041; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:20:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nimbus.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.191.85]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:20:03 +0000 (GMT) From: Laurent Dufour To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, mhocko@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox , benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andrea Arcangeli , Alexei Starovoitov , kemi.wang@intel.com, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v6 06/24] mm: VMA sequence count Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 18:25:50 +0100 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1515777968-867-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1515777968-867-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18011217-0008-0000-0000-000004C1215E X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18011217-0009-0000-0000-00001E5481B3 Message-Id: <1515777968-867-7-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-01-12_09:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1801120238 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Tim Chen , haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Peter Zijlstra Wrap the VMA modifications (vma_adjust/unmap_page_range) with sequence counts such that we can easily test if a VMA is changed. The unmap_page_range() one allows us to make assumptions about page-tables; when we find the seqcount hasn't changed we can assume page-tables are still valid. The flip side is that we cannot distinguish between a vma_adjust() and the unmap_page_range() -- where with the former we could have re-checked the vma bounds against the address. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) [Port to 4.12 kernel] [Build depends on CONFIG_SPF] [Introduce vm_write_* inline function depending on CONFIG_SPF] [Fix lock dependency between mapping->i_mmap_rwsem and vma->vm_sequence by using vm_raw_write* functions] Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour --- include/linux/mm.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mm_types.h | 3 +++ mm/memory.c | 2 ++ mm/mmap.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index ad299ed7b85c..ca7ceba84292 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -1369,6 +1369,47 @@ static inline void unmap_shared_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping, unmap_mapping_range(mapping, holebegin, holelen, 0); } +#ifdef CONFIG_SPF +static inline void vm_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence); +} +static inline void vm_write_begin_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma, + int subclass) +{ + write_seqcount_begin_nested(&vma->vm_sequence, subclass); +} +static inline void vm_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence); +} +static inline void vm_raw_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + raw_write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence); +} +static inline void vm_raw_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + raw_write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence); +} +#else +static inline void vm_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ +} +static inline void vm_write_begin_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma, + int subclass) +{ +} +static inline void vm_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ +} +static inline void vm_raw_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ +} +static inline void vm_raw_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ +} +#endif /* CONFIG_SPF */ + extern int access_process_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr, void *buf, int len, unsigned int gup_flags); extern int access_remote_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h index fd1af6b9591d..e0e3df3b9641 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h @@ -333,6 +333,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct { struct mempolicy *vm_policy; /* NUMA policy for the VMA */ #endif struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx vm_userfaultfd_ctx; +#ifdef CONFIG_SPF + seqcount_t vm_sequence; +#endif } __randomize_layout; struct core_thread { diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 6b2c4732e49d..22bdc5c6c5ee 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -1503,6 +1503,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, unsigned long next; BUG_ON(addr >= end); + vm_write_begin(vma); tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma); pgd = pgd_offset(vma->vm_mm, addr); do { @@ -1512,6 +1513,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, next = zap_p4d_range(tlb, vma, pgd, addr, next, details); } while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end); tlb_end_vma(tlb, vma); + vm_write_end(vma); } diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c index 4bb038e7984b..1dc5397fbd59 100644 --- a/mm/mmap.c +++ b/mm/mmap.c @@ -558,6 +558,10 @@ void __vma_link_rb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, else mm->highest_vm_end = vm_end_gap(vma); +#ifdef CONFIG_SPF + seqcount_init(&vma->vm_sequence); +#endif + /* * vma->vm_prev wasn't known when we followed the rbtree to find the * correct insertion point for that vma. As a result, we could not @@ -692,6 +696,30 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, long adjust_next = 0; int remove_next = 0; + /* + * Why using vm_raw_write*() functions here to avoid lockdep's warning ? + * + * Locked is complaining about a theoretical lock dependency, involving + * 3 locks: + * mapping->i_mmap_rwsem --> vma->vm_sequence --> fs_reclaim + * + * Here are the major path leading to this dependency : + * 1. __vma_adjust() mmap_sem -> vm_sequence -> i_mmap_rwsem + * 2. move_vmap() mmap_sem -> vm_sequence -> fs_reclaim + * 3. __alloc_pages_nodemask() fs_reclaim -> i_mmap_rwsem + * 4. unmap_mapping_range() i_mmap_rwsem -> vm_sequence + * + * So there is no way to solve this easily, especially because in + * unmap_mapping_range() the i_mmap_rwsem is grab while the impacted + * VMAs are not yet known. + * However, the way the vm_seq is used is guarantying that we will + * never block on it since we just check for its value and never wait + * for it to move, see vma_has_changed() and handle_speculative_fault(). + */ + vm_raw_write_begin(vma); + if (next) + vm_raw_write_begin(next); + if (next && !insert) { struct vm_area_struct *exporter = NULL, *importer = NULL; @@ -902,6 +930,7 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, anon_vma_merge(vma, next); mm->map_count--; mpol_put(vma_policy(next)); + vm_raw_write_end(next); kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, next); /* * In mprotect's case 6 (see comments on vma_merge), @@ -916,6 +945,8 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, * "vma->vm_next" gap must be updated. */ next = vma->vm_next; + if (next) + vm_raw_write_begin(next); } else { /* * For the scope of the comment "next" and @@ -962,6 +993,10 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, if (insert && file) uprobe_mmap(insert); + if (next && next != vma) + vm_raw_write_end(next); + vm_raw_write_end(vma); + validate_mm(mm); return 0;