diff mbox

[RFC,8/9] powerpc: Support to replay PMIs

Message ID 1469458342-26233-9-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show

Commit Message

maddy July 25, 2016, 2:52 p.m. UTC
Code to replay the Performance Monitoring Interrupts(PMI).
In the masked_interrupt handler, for PMIs we reset the MSR[EE]
and return. This is due the fact that PMIs are level triggered.
In the __check_irq_replay(), we enabled the MSR[EE] which will
fire the interrupt for us.

Patch also adds a new arch_local_irq_disable_var() variant. New
variant takes an input value to write to the paca->soft_enabled.
This will be used in following patch to implement the tri-state
value for soft-enabled.

Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
 arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c         |  9 ++++++++-
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Nicholas Piggin July 26, 2016, 5:50 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:22:21 +0530
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Code to replay the Performance Monitoring Interrupts(PMI).
> In the masked_interrupt handler, for PMIs we reset the MSR[EE]
> and return. This is due the fact that PMIs are level triggered.
> In the __check_irq_replay(), we enabled the MSR[EE] which will
> fire the interrupt for us.
> 
> Patch also adds a new arch_local_irq_disable_var() variant. New
> variant takes an input value to write to the paca->soft_enabled.
> This will be used in following patch to implement the tri-state
> value for soft-enabled.

Same comment also applies about patches being standalone
transformations that work before and after. Some of these
can be squashed together I think.


> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c         |  9 ++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h index cc69dde6eb84..863179654452
> 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> @@ -81,6 +81,20 @@ static inline unsigned long
> arch_local_irq_disable(void) return flags;
>  }
>  
> +static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_disable_var(int value)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags, zero;
> +
> +	asm volatile(
> +		"li %1,%3; lbz %0,%2(13); stb %1,%2(13)"
> +		: "=r" (flags), "=&r" (zero)
> +		: "i" (offsetof(struct paca_struct, soft_enabled)),\
> +		  "i" (value)
> +		: "memory");
> +
> +	return flags;
> +}

arch_ function suggests it is arch implementation of a generic
kernel function or something. I think our soft interrupt levels
are just used in powerpc specific code.

The name could also be a little more descriptive.

I would have our internal function be something like

soft_irq_set_level(), and then the arch disable just sets to
the appropriate level as it does today.

The PMU disable level could be implemented in powerpc specific
header with local_irq_and_pmu_disable() or something like that.

Thanks,
Nick
maddy July 26, 2016, 6:40 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 11:20 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:22:21 +0530
> Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Code to replay the Performance Monitoring Interrupts(PMI).
>> In the masked_interrupt handler, for PMIs we reset the MSR[EE]
>> and return. This is due the fact that PMIs are level triggered.
>> In the __check_irq_replay(), we enabled the MSR[EE] which will
>> fire the interrupt for us.
>>
>> Patch also adds a new arch_local_irq_disable_var() variant. New
>> variant takes an input value to write to the paca->soft_enabled.
>> This will be used in following patch to implement the tri-state
>> value for soft-enabled.
> Same comment also applies about patches being standalone
> transformations that work before and after. Some of these
> can be squashed together I think.
Sure.

>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c         |  9 ++++++++-
>>   2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h index cc69dde6eb84..863179654452
>> 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
>> @@ -81,6 +81,20 @@ static inline unsigned long
>> arch_local_irq_disable(void) return flags;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_disable_var(int value)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long flags, zero;
>> +
>> +	asm volatile(
>> +		"li %1,%3; lbz %0,%2(13); stb %1,%2(13)"
>> +		: "=r" (flags), "=&r" (zero)
>> +		: "i" (offsetof(struct paca_struct, soft_enabled)),\
>> +		  "i" (value)
>> +		: "memory");
>> +
>> +	return flags;
>> +}
> arch_ function suggests it is arch implementation of a generic
> kernel function or something. I think our soft interrupt levels
> are just used in powerpc specific code.
>
> The name could also be a little more descriptive.
>
> I would have our internal function be something like
>
> soft_irq_set_level(), and then the arch disable just sets to
> the appropriate level as it does today.
>
> The PMU disable level could be implemented in powerpc specific
> header with local_irq_and_pmu_disable() or something like that.

Yes. will do.

>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
index cc69dde6eb84..863179654452 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
@@ -81,6 +81,20 @@  static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_disable(void)
 	return flags;
 }
 
+static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_disable_var(int value)
+{
+	unsigned long flags, zero;
+
+	asm volatile(
+		"li %1,%3; lbz %0,%2(13); stb %1,%2(13)"
+		: "=r" (flags), "=&r" (zero)
+		: "i" (offsetof(struct paca_struct, soft_enabled)),\
+		  "i" (value)
+		: "memory");
+
+	return flags;
+}
+
 extern void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long);
 
 static inline void arch_local_irq_enable(void)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
index 597c20d1814c..81fe0da1f86d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
@@ -158,9 +158,16 @@  notrace unsigned int __check_irq_replay(void)
 	if ((happened & PACA_IRQ_DEC) || decrementer_check_overflow())
 		return 0x900;
 
+	/*
+	 * In masked_handler() for PMI, we disable MSR[EE] and return.
+	 * When replaying it, just enabling the MSR[EE] will do
+	 * trick, since the PMI are "level" triggered.
+	 */
+	local_paca->irq_happened &= ~PACA_IRQ_PMI;
+
 	/* Finally check if an external interrupt happened */
 	local_paca->irq_happened &= ~PACA_IRQ_EE;
-	if (happened & PACA_IRQ_EE)
+	if ((happened & PACA_IRQ_EE) || (happened & PACA_IRQ_PMI))
 		return 0x500;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E